Comparison of distraction techniques using salivary biomarkers during local anaesthesia administration in children aged 3–5 years: A clinical study

Aim: In paediatric dentistry, pain is adversely influenced by a child's level of anxiety. Ironically, the most common form of pain control used in dentistry, local anaesthesia, can itself produce anxiety. One of the techniques to overcome a child's anxiety is using distraction. The aim of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yanina Singh, Poornima Parameshwarappa, Mebin George Mathew, S B Meghana, Mallikarjuna Kenchappa, N B Nagaveni
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2023-01-01
Series:Indian Journal of Dental Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ijdr.in/article.asp?issn=0970-9290;year=2023;volume=34;issue=2;spage=169;epage=173;aulast=Singh
_version_ 1797649337364250624
author Yanina Singh
Poornima Parameshwarappa
Mebin George Mathew
S B Meghana
Mallikarjuna Kenchappa
N B Nagaveni
author_facet Yanina Singh
Poornima Parameshwarappa
Mebin George Mathew
S B Meghana
Mallikarjuna Kenchappa
N B Nagaveni
author_sort Yanina Singh
collection DOAJ
description Aim: In paediatric dentistry, pain is adversely influenced by a child's level of anxiety. Ironically, the most common form of pain control used in dentistry, local anaesthesia, can itself produce anxiety. One of the techniques to overcome a child's anxiety is using distraction. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness of distraction techniques, i.e. audio distraction (AD) and audio-visual distraction (AVD) by measuring salivary stress biomarker (salivary cortisol and salivary alpha-amylase) levels in 3–5 year-old children. Materials and Methods: Forty children aged 3–5 years were divided randomly into two groups; (Group I = AD, Group II = AVD). Cotton pellets were placed in the lingual vestibule to collect a sample of saliva. Children were then asked to wear overhead phones in the AD group, connected to a phone, and rhymes were played. In AVD, a cartoon movie was shown to the children using AV glasses. Simultaneously, local anaesthesia was administrated to children, after which another saliva sample was collected. Biomarker estimation was done using ELISA. Fisher's exact test was used for statistical analysis. Results: Statistically significant results were seen with Group II compared to Group I (cortisol-P = 0.009; salivary alpha-amylase-P = 0.03). Conclusion: Both distraction techniques are effective in reducing stress but compared to AD, AVD is more efficacious.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T15:45:41Z
format Article
id doaj.art-03fdee0d3543441da7ac50a264d17cbb
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0970-9290
1998-3603
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T15:45:41Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Indian Journal of Dental Research
spelling doaj.art-03fdee0d3543441da7ac50a264d17cbb2023-10-26T06:34:09ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Dental Research0970-92901998-36032023-01-0134216917310.4103/ijdr.ijdr_132_22Comparison of distraction techniques using salivary biomarkers during local anaesthesia administration in children aged 3–5 years: A clinical studyYanina SinghPoornima ParameshwarappaMebin George MathewS B MeghanaMallikarjuna KenchappaN B NagaveniAim: In paediatric dentistry, pain is adversely influenced by a child's level of anxiety. Ironically, the most common form of pain control used in dentistry, local anaesthesia, can itself produce anxiety. One of the techniques to overcome a child's anxiety is using distraction. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness of distraction techniques, i.e. audio distraction (AD) and audio-visual distraction (AVD) by measuring salivary stress biomarker (salivary cortisol and salivary alpha-amylase) levels in 3–5 year-old children. Materials and Methods: Forty children aged 3–5 years were divided randomly into two groups; (Group I = AD, Group II = AVD). Cotton pellets were placed in the lingual vestibule to collect a sample of saliva. Children were then asked to wear overhead phones in the AD group, connected to a phone, and rhymes were played. In AVD, a cartoon movie was shown to the children using AV glasses. Simultaneously, local anaesthesia was administrated to children, after which another saliva sample was collected. Biomarker estimation was done using ELISA. Fisher's exact test was used for statistical analysis. Results: Statistically significant results were seen with Group II compared to Group I (cortisol-P = 0.009; salivary alpha-amylase-P = 0.03). Conclusion: Both distraction techniques are effective in reducing stress but compared to AD, AVD is more efficacious.http://www.ijdr.in/article.asp?issn=0970-9290;year=2023;volume=34;issue=2;spage=169;epage=173;aulast=Singhaudio distractionaudio-visual distractionelisasalivary alpha-amylasesalivary cortisol
spellingShingle Yanina Singh
Poornima Parameshwarappa
Mebin George Mathew
S B Meghana
Mallikarjuna Kenchappa
N B Nagaveni
Comparison of distraction techniques using salivary biomarkers during local anaesthesia administration in children aged 3–5 years: A clinical study
Indian Journal of Dental Research
audio distraction
audio-visual distraction
elisa
salivary alpha-amylase
salivary cortisol
title Comparison of distraction techniques using salivary biomarkers during local anaesthesia administration in children aged 3–5 years: A clinical study
title_full Comparison of distraction techniques using salivary biomarkers during local anaesthesia administration in children aged 3–5 years: A clinical study
title_fullStr Comparison of distraction techniques using salivary biomarkers during local anaesthesia administration in children aged 3–5 years: A clinical study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of distraction techniques using salivary biomarkers during local anaesthesia administration in children aged 3–5 years: A clinical study
title_short Comparison of distraction techniques using salivary biomarkers during local anaesthesia administration in children aged 3–5 years: A clinical study
title_sort comparison of distraction techniques using salivary biomarkers during local anaesthesia administration in children aged 3 5 years a clinical study
topic audio distraction
audio-visual distraction
elisa
salivary alpha-amylase
salivary cortisol
url http://www.ijdr.in/article.asp?issn=0970-9290;year=2023;volume=34;issue=2;spage=169;epage=173;aulast=Singh
work_keys_str_mv AT yaninasingh comparisonofdistractiontechniquesusingsalivarybiomarkersduringlocalanaesthesiaadministrationinchildrenaged35yearsaclinicalstudy
AT poornimaparameshwarappa comparisonofdistractiontechniquesusingsalivarybiomarkersduringlocalanaesthesiaadministrationinchildrenaged35yearsaclinicalstudy
AT mebingeorgemathew comparisonofdistractiontechniquesusingsalivarybiomarkersduringlocalanaesthesiaadministrationinchildrenaged35yearsaclinicalstudy
AT sbmeghana comparisonofdistractiontechniquesusingsalivarybiomarkersduringlocalanaesthesiaadministrationinchildrenaged35yearsaclinicalstudy
AT mallikarjunakenchappa comparisonofdistractiontechniquesusingsalivarybiomarkersduringlocalanaesthesiaadministrationinchildrenaged35yearsaclinicalstudy
AT nbnagaveni comparisonofdistractiontechniquesusingsalivarybiomarkersduringlocalanaesthesiaadministrationinchildrenaged35yearsaclinicalstudy