Coordination and collective performance: Cooperative goals boost interpersonal synchrony and task outcomes

Whether it be a rugby team or a rescue crew, ensuring peak group performance is a primary goal during collective activities. In reality however, groups often suffer from productivity losses that can lead to less than optimal outputs. Where researchers have focused on this problem, inefficiencies in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jamie S. Allsop, Tomas Vaitkus, Dannette Marie, Lynden K Miles
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-09-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01462/full
_version_ 1818155368886304768
author Jamie S. Allsop
Tomas Vaitkus
Dannette Marie
Lynden K Miles
author_facet Jamie S. Allsop
Tomas Vaitkus
Dannette Marie
Lynden K Miles
author_sort Jamie S. Allsop
collection DOAJ
description Whether it be a rugby team or a rescue crew, ensuring peak group performance is a primary goal during collective activities. In reality however, groups often suffer from productivity losses that can lead to less than optimal outputs. Where researchers have focused on this problem, inefficiencies in the way team members coordinate their efforts has been identified as one potent source of productivity decrements. Here we set out to explore whether performance on a simple object movement task is shaped by the spontaneous emergence of interpersonally coordinated behavior. Forty-six pairs of participants were instructed to either compete or cooperate in order to empty a container of approximately 100 small plastic balls as quickly and accurately as possible. Each trial was recorded to video and a frame-differencing approach was employed to estimate between-person coordination. The results revealed that cooperative pairs coordinated to a greater extent than their competitive counterparts. Furthermore, coordination, as well as movement regularity were positively related to accuracy, an effect that was most prominent when the task was structured such that opportunities to coordinate were restricted. These findings are discussed with regard to contemporary theories of coordination and collective performance.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T14:41:18Z
format Article
id doaj.art-04099292d4c6486b8be6147a010897fe
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-1078
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T14:41:18Z
publishDate 2016-09-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Psychology
spelling doaj.art-04099292d4c6486b8be6147a010897fe2022-12-22T01:01:54ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782016-09-01710.3389/fpsyg.2016.01462213465Coordination and collective performance: Cooperative goals boost interpersonal synchrony and task outcomesJamie S. Allsop0Tomas Vaitkus1Dannette Marie2Lynden K Miles3University of AberdeenUniversity of AberdeenUniversity of AberdeenUniversity of AberdeenWhether it be a rugby team or a rescue crew, ensuring peak group performance is a primary goal during collective activities. In reality however, groups often suffer from productivity losses that can lead to less than optimal outputs. Where researchers have focused on this problem, inefficiencies in the way team members coordinate their efforts has been identified as one potent source of productivity decrements. Here we set out to explore whether performance on a simple object movement task is shaped by the spontaneous emergence of interpersonally coordinated behavior. Forty-six pairs of participants were instructed to either compete or cooperate in order to empty a container of approximately 100 small plastic balls as quickly and accurately as possible. Each trial was recorded to video and a frame-differencing approach was employed to estimate between-person coordination. The results revealed that cooperative pairs coordinated to a greater extent than their competitive counterparts. Furthermore, coordination, as well as movement regularity were positively related to accuracy, an effect that was most prominent when the task was structured such that opportunities to coordinate were restricted. These findings are discussed with regard to contemporary theories of coordination and collective performance.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01462/fullcooperationcompetitionCoordination DynamicsproductivityTeamworkInterpersonal synchrony
spellingShingle Jamie S. Allsop
Tomas Vaitkus
Dannette Marie
Lynden K Miles
Coordination and collective performance: Cooperative goals boost interpersonal synchrony and task outcomes
Frontiers in Psychology
cooperation
competition
Coordination Dynamics
productivity
Teamwork
Interpersonal synchrony
title Coordination and collective performance: Cooperative goals boost interpersonal synchrony and task outcomes
title_full Coordination and collective performance: Cooperative goals boost interpersonal synchrony and task outcomes
title_fullStr Coordination and collective performance: Cooperative goals boost interpersonal synchrony and task outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Coordination and collective performance: Cooperative goals boost interpersonal synchrony and task outcomes
title_short Coordination and collective performance: Cooperative goals boost interpersonal synchrony and task outcomes
title_sort coordination and collective performance cooperative goals boost interpersonal synchrony and task outcomes
topic cooperation
competition
Coordination Dynamics
productivity
Teamwork
Interpersonal synchrony
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01462/full
work_keys_str_mv AT jamiesallsop coordinationandcollectiveperformancecooperativegoalsboostinterpersonalsynchronyandtaskoutcomes
AT tomasvaitkus coordinationandcollectiveperformancecooperativegoalsboostinterpersonalsynchronyandtaskoutcomes
AT dannettemarie coordinationandcollectiveperformancecooperativegoalsboostinterpersonalsynchronyandtaskoutcomes
AT lyndenkmiles coordinationandcollectiveperformancecooperativegoalsboostinterpersonalsynchronyandtaskoutcomes