Landscape of pediatric cancer treatment refusal and abandonment in the US: A qualitative study

ObjectiveTo describe United States (US) pediatric oncologists’ experiences with treatment refusal or abandonment, exploring types and frequency of decision-making conflicts, and their impact.Study designWe conducted exploratory qualitative interviews of pediatric oncologists (n = 30) with experience...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Daniel J. Benedetti, Catherine M. Hammack-Aviran, Carolyn Diehl, Laura M. Beskow
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Pediatrics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fped.2022.1049661/full
_version_ 1797295119389425664
author Daniel J. Benedetti
Daniel J. Benedetti
Catherine M. Hammack-Aviran
Carolyn Diehl
Laura M. Beskow
author_facet Daniel J. Benedetti
Daniel J. Benedetti
Catherine M. Hammack-Aviran
Carolyn Diehl
Laura M. Beskow
author_sort Daniel J. Benedetti
collection DOAJ
description ObjectiveTo describe United States (US) pediatric oncologists’ experiences with treatment refusal or abandonment, exploring types and frequency of decision-making conflicts, and their impact.Study designWe conducted exploratory qualitative interviews of pediatric oncologists (n = 30) with experience caring for a pediatric patient who refused or abandoned curative treatment. Interviewees were recruited using convenience and nominated expert sampling, soliciting experiences from diverse geographic locations and institution sizes across the US. We analyzed transcripts using applied thematic analysis to identify and refine meaningful domains.ResultsMany oncologists reported multiple experiences with refusal and abandonment. Most anticipated case frequency would increase due to misinformation, particularly on the internet. Interviewees described cases of treatment refusal and abandonment, but also a wider variety of cases than previously described in existing publications, including cases involving: non-adherence; negotiations for different treatments; negotiations for complementary and alternative medicine; delayed treatment initiation; and refusal of a component of recommended therapy. Cases often involved multiple stages or types of conflicts. Recurring patient/family behaviors emerged: clear opposition to treatment from the outset; hesitancy about treatment despite initiating therapy; and psychosocial circumstances becoming an obstacle to treatment completion. Oncologists revealed substantial professional and personal repercussions of these cases.ConclusionOncologist interviews highlight a broad range of conflicts, yielding a taxonomy of treatment refusal, non-adherence and abandonment (TRNA) that accounts for the heterogeneity of situations described. Cases’ complexity and interrelatedness points to a functional model of TRNA that includes families’ behaviors. This preliminary taxonomy and model warrant further research and examination to refine the model and generate strategies to prevent and mitigate TRNA.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T21:42:07Z
format Article
id doaj.art-04394cb540574f71aa7e13787a97d677
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2296-2360
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T21:42:07Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Pediatrics
spelling doaj.art-04394cb540574f71aa7e13787a97d6772024-02-26T04:51:44ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Pediatrics2296-23602023-01-011010.3389/fped.2022.10496611049661Landscape of pediatric cancer treatment refusal and abandonment in the US: A qualitative studyDaniel J. Benedetti0Daniel J. Benedetti1Catherine M. Hammack-Aviran2Carolyn Diehl3Laura M. Beskow4Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United StatesCenter for Biomedical Ethics and Society, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United StatesCenter for Biomedical Ethics and Society, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United StatesCenter for Biomedical Ethics and Society, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United StatesCenter for Biomedical Ethics and Society, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United StatesObjectiveTo describe United States (US) pediatric oncologists’ experiences with treatment refusal or abandonment, exploring types and frequency of decision-making conflicts, and their impact.Study designWe conducted exploratory qualitative interviews of pediatric oncologists (n = 30) with experience caring for a pediatric patient who refused or abandoned curative treatment. Interviewees were recruited using convenience and nominated expert sampling, soliciting experiences from diverse geographic locations and institution sizes across the US. We analyzed transcripts using applied thematic analysis to identify and refine meaningful domains.ResultsMany oncologists reported multiple experiences with refusal and abandonment. Most anticipated case frequency would increase due to misinformation, particularly on the internet. Interviewees described cases of treatment refusal and abandonment, but also a wider variety of cases than previously described in existing publications, including cases involving: non-adherence; negotiations for different treatments; negotiations for complementary and alternative medicine; delayed treatment initiation; and refusal of a component of recommended therapy. Cases often involved multiple stages or types of conflicts. Recurring patient/family behaviors emerged: clear opposition to treatment from the outset; hesitancy about treatment despite initiating therapy; and psychosocial circumstances becoming an obstacle to treatment completion. Oncologists revealed substantial professional and personal repercussions of these cases.ConclusionOncologist interviews highlight a broad range of conflicts, yielding a taxonomy of treatment refusal, non-adherence and abandonment (TRNA) that accounts for the heterogeneity of situations described. Cases’ complexity and interrelatedness points to a functional model of TRNA that includes families’ behaviors. This preliminary taxonomy and model warrant further research and examination to refine the model and generate strategies to prevent and mitigate TRNA.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fped.2022.1049661/fullbioethicschildhood cancerabandonmentnon-adherencepediatric oncologyethics
spellingShingle Daniel J. Benedetti
Daniel J. Benedetti
Catherine M. Hammack-Aviran
Carolyn Diehl
Laura M. Beskow
Landscape of pediatric cancer treatment refusal and abandonment in the US: A qualitative study
Frontiers in Pediatrics
bioethics
childhood cancer
abandonment
non-adherence
pediatric oncology
ethics
title Landscape of pediatric cancer treatment refusal and abandonment in the US: A qualitative study
title_full Landscape of pediatric cancer treatment refusal and abandonment in the US: A qualitative study
title_fullStr Landscape of pediatric cancer treatment refusal and abandonment in the US: A qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed Landscape of pediatric cancer treatment refusal and abandonment in the US: A qualitative study
title_short Landscape of pediatric cancer treatment refusal and abandonment in the US: A qualitative study
title_sort landscape of pediatric cancer treatment refusal and abandonment in the us a qualitative study
topic bioethics
childhood cancer
abandonment
non-adherence
pediatric oncology
ethics
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fped.2022.1049661/full
work_keys_str_mv AT danieljbenedetti landscapeofpediatriccancertreatmentrefusalandabandonmentintheusaqualitativestudy
AT danieljbenedetti landscapeofpediatriccancertreatmentrefusalandabandonmentintheusaqualitativestudy
AT catherinemhammackaviran landscapeofpediatriccancertreatmentrefusalandabandonmentintheusaqualitativestudy
AT carolyndiehl landscapeofpediatriccancertreatmentrefusalandabandonmentintheusaqualitativestudy
AT laurambeskow landscapeofpediatriccancertreatmentrefusalandabandonmentintheusaqualitativestudy