Examining Co-management of National Parks through the Lens of Common-pool Resource Design Principles: A Comparative Case Study of Liwonde and Majete in Malawi

Co-management which was founded on common-pool resource design principles has been popularized in solving sustainability challenges of national parks. Co-management was imposed on all national parks in Malawi under the 2000 Wildlife Policy. However, such a top-down approach might neglect the local...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Timothy M. Chana, Panate Manomaivibool
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Environmental Research Institute, Chulalongkorn University 2016-08-01
Series:Applied Environmental Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ph01.tci-thaijo.org/jer/index.php/aer/article/view/64914
_version_ 1797294854919684096
author Timothy M. Chana
Panate Manomaivibool
author_facet Timothy M. Chana
Panate Manomaivibool
author_sort Timothy M. Chana
collection DOAJ
description Co-management which was founded on common-pool resource design principles has been popularized in solving sustainability challenges of national parks. Co-management was imposed on all national parks in Malawi under the 2000 Wildlife Policy. However, such a top-down approach might neglect the local contexts that influenced policy implementation. The objective of this study was to examine the implementation of co-management and determine the extent of conformity to Ostrom’s eight design principles. The Institutional Analysis and Development (IAD) framework was engaged through a qualitative case study of Liwonde National Park and Majete Wildlife Reserve. Based on co-management documentations and key informant interviews, the research found varied extents of conformity in the two cases despite a unified national policy framework. Majete was more supportive to the design principles than Liwonde because of resource, user and institutional attributes. The study proposed fine tuning the implementation process towards contextualizing these attributes for long term delivery of perceivable biodiversity and livelihoods benefits.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T21:37:10Z
format Article
id doaj.art-045ff4d2b67f4be981e6d716705b8c34
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2287-075X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T21:37:10Z
publishDate 2016-08-01
publisher Environmental Research Institute, Chulalongkorn University
record_format Article
series Applied Environmental Research
spelling doaj.art-045ff4d2b67f4be981e6d716705b8c342024-02-26T10:50:44ZengEnvironmental Research Institute, Chulalongkorn UniversityApplied Environmental Research2287-075X2016-08-0138210.35762/AER.2016.38.2.7Examining Co-management of National Parks through the Lens of Common-pool Resource Design Principles: A Comparative Case Study of Liwonde and Majete in MalawiTimothy M. Chana0Panate Manomaivibool1School of Science, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai, ThailandSchool of Science, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai, Thailand Co-management which was founded on common-pool resource design principles has been popularized in solving sustainability challenges of national parks. Co-management was imposed on all national parks in Malawi under the 2000 Wildlife Policy. However, such a top-down approach might neglect the local contexts that influenced policy implementation. The objective of this study was to examine the implementation of co-management and determine the extent of conformity to Ostrom’s eight design principles. The Institutional Analysis and Development (IAD) framework was engaged through a qualitative case study of Liwonde National Park and Majete Wildlife Reserve. Based on co-management documentations and key informant interviews, the research found varied extents of conformity in the two cases despite a unified national policy framework. Majete was more supportive to the design principles than Liwonde because of resource, user and institutional attributes. The study proposed fine tuning the implementation process towards contextualizing these attributes for long term delivery of perceivable biodiversity and livelihoods benefits. https://ph01.tci-thaijo.org/jer/index.php/aer/article/view/64914BiodiversityCo-managementCommon-pool resourcesCommunity-based managementNational parksWildlife conservation
spellingShingle Timothy M. Chana
Panate Manomaivibool
Examining Co-management of National Parks through the Lens of Common-pool Resource Design Principles: A Comparative Case Study of Liwonde and Majete in Malawi
Applied Environmental Research
Biodiversity
Co-management
Common-pool resources
Community-based management
National parks
Wildlife conservation
title Examining Co-management of National Parks through the Lens of Common-pool Resource Design Principles: A Comparative Case Study of Liwonde and Majete in Malawi
title_full Examining Co-management of National Parks through the Lens of Common-pool Resource Design Principles: A Comparative Case Study of Liwonde and Majete in Malawi
title_fullStr Examining Co-management of National Parks through the Lens of Common-pool Resource Design Principles: A Comparative Case Study of Liwonde and Majete in Malawi
title_full_unstemmed Examining Co-management of National Parks through the Lens of Common-pool Resource Design Principles: A Comparative Case Study of Liwonde and Majete in Malawi
title_short Examining Co-management of National Parks through the Lens of Common-pool Resource Design Principles: A Comparative Case Study of Liwonde and Majete in Malawi
title_sort examining co management of national parks through the lens of common pool resource design principles a comparative case study of liwonde and majete in malawi
topic Biodiversity
Co-management
Common-pool resources
Community-based management
National parks
Wildlife conservation
url https://ph01.tci-thaijo.org/jer/index.php/aer/article/view/64914
work_keys_str_mv AT timothymchana examiningcomanagementofnationalparksthroughthelensofcommonpoolresourcedesignprinciplesacomparativecasestudyofliwondeandmajeteinmalawi
AT panatemanomaivibool examiningcomanagementofnationalparksthroughthelensofcommonpoolresourcedesignprinciplesacomparativecasestudyofliwondeandmajeteinmalawi