A Novel Model Fusion Approach for Greenhouse Crop Yield Prediction

In this work, we have proposed a novel methodology for greenhouse tomato yield prediction, which is based on a hybrid of an explanatory biophysical model—the Tomgro model, and a machine learning model called CNN-RNN. The Tomgro and CNN-RNN models are calibrated/trained for predicting tomato yields w...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Liyun Gong, Miao Yu, Vassilis Cutsuridis, Stefanos Kollias, Simon Pearson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-12-01
Series:Horticulturae
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2311-7524/9/1/5
_version_ 1797441798022365184
author Liyun Gong
Miao Yu
Vassilis Cutsuridis
Stefanos Kollias
Simon Pearson
author_facet Liyun Gong
Miao Yu
Vassilis Cutsuridis
Stefanos Kollias
Simon Pearson
author_sort Liyun Gong
collection DOAJ
description In this work, we have proposed a novel methodology for greenhouse tomato yield prediction, which is based on a hybrid of an explanatory biophysical model—the Tomgro model, and a machine learning model called CNN-RNN. The Tomgro and CNN-RNN models are calibrated/trained for predicting tomato yields while different fusion approaches (linear, Bayesian, neural network, random forest and gradient boosting) are exploited for fusing the prediction result of individual models for obtaining the final prediction results. The experimental results have shown that the model fusion approach achieves more accurate prediction results than the explanatory biophysical model or the machine learning model. Moreover, out of different model fusion approaches, the neural network one produced the most accurate tomato prediction results, with means and standard deviations of root mean square error (RMSE), r2-coefficient, Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) and percent bias (PBIAS) being 17.69 ± 3.47 g/m<inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><msup><mrow></mrow><mn>2</mn></msup></semantics></math></inline-formula>, 0.9995 ± 0.0002, 0.9989 ± 0.0004 and 0.1791 ± 0.6837, respectively.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T12:30:16Z
format Article
id doaj.art-046594dc207e45ff8d85965d313d8b00
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2311-7524
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T12:30:16Z
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Horticulturae
spelling doaj.art-046594dc207e45ff8d85965d313d8b002023-11-30T22:29:29ZengMDPI AGHorticulturae2311-75242022-12-0191510.3390/horticulturae9010005A Novel Model Fusion Approach for Greenhouse Crop Yield PredictionLiyun Gong0Miao Yu1Vassilis Cutsuridis2Stefanos Kollias3Simon Pearson4School of Computer Science, University of Lincoln, Lincoln LN6 7TS, UKSchool of Computer Science, University of Lincoln, Lincoln LN6 7TS, UKSchool of Computer Science, University of Lincoln, Lincoln LN6 7TS, UKSchool of Computer Science, University of Lincoln, Lincoln LN6 7TS, UKLincoln Institute for Agri-Food Technology, University of Lincoln, Lincoln LN6 7TS, UKIn this work, we have proposed a novel methodology for greenhouse tomato yield prediction, which is based on a hybrid of an explanatory biophysical model—the Tomgro model, and a machine learning model called CNN-RNN. The Tomgro and CNN-RNN models are calibrated/trained for predicting tomato yields while different fusion approaches (linear, Bayesian, neural network, random forest and gradient boosting) are exploited for fusing the prediction result of individual models for obtaining the final prediction results. The experimental results have shown that the model fusion approach achieves more accurate prediction results than the explanatory biophysical model or the machine learning model. Moreover, out of different model fusion approaches, the neural network one produced the most accurate tomato prediction results, with means and standard deviations of root mean square error (RMSE), r2-coefficient, Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) and percent bias (PBIAS) being 17.69 ± 3.47 g/m<inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><msup><mrow></mrow><mn>2</mn></msup></semantics></math></inline-formula>, 0.9995 ± 0.0002, 0.9989 ± 0.0004 and 0.1791 ± 0.6837, respectively.https://www.mdpi.com/2311-7524/9/1/5biophysical modeldeep neural networkrecurrent neural networkconvolutional neural networkmodel fusioncrop yield prediction
spellingShingle Liyun Gong
Miao Yu
Vassilis Cutsuridis
Stefanos Kollias
Simon Pearson
A Novel Model Fusion Approach for Greenhouse Crop Yield Prediction
Horticulturae
biophysical model
deep neural network
recurrent neural network
convolutional neural network
model fusion
crop yield prediction
title A Novel Model Fusion Approach for Greenhouse Crop Yield Prediction
title_full A Novel Model Fusion Approach for Greenhouse Crop Yield Prediction
title_fullStr A Novel Model Fusion Approach for Greenhouse Crop Yield Prediction
title_full_unstemmed A Novel Model Fusion Approach for Greenhouse Crop Yield Prediction
title_short A Novel Model Fusion Approach for Greenhouse Crop Yield Prediction
title_sort novel model fusion approach for greenhouse crop yield prediction
topic biophysical model
deep neural network
recurrent neural network
convolutional neural network
model fusion
crop yield prediction
url https://www.mdpi.com/2311-7524/9/1/5
work_keys_str_mv AT liyungong anovelmodelfusionapproachforgreenhousecropyieldprediction
AT miaoyu anovelmodelfusionapproachforgreenhousecropyieldprediction
AT vassiliscutsuridis anovelmodelfusionapproachforgreenhousecropyieldprediction
AT stefanoskollias anovelmodelfusionapproachforgreenhousecropyieldprediction
AT simonpearson anovelmodelfusionapproachforgreenhousecropyieldprediction
AT liyungong novelmodelfusionapproachforgreenhousecropyieldprediction
AT miaoyu novelmodelfusionapproachforgreenhousecropyieldprediction
AT vassiliscutsuridis novelmodelfusionapproachforgreenhousecropyieldprediction
AT stefanoskollias novelmodelfusionapproachforgreenhousecropyieldprediction
AT simonpearson novelmodelfusionapproachforgreenhousecropyieldprediction