Golimumab in juvenile idiopathic arthritis-associated uveitis unresponsive to Adalimumab

Abstract Objective To assess the efficacy of golimumab (GLM) as a treatment option for juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA)-associated uveitis refractory to adalimumab (ADA). Methods Retrospective single-centre study including patients with JIA receiving GLM for active uveitis after failing ADA. JIA-...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sofia Lanz, Gerald Seidel, Andrea Skrabl-Baumgartner
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-08-01
Series:Pediatric Rheumatology Online Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12969-021-00630-1
_version_ 1818645041210458112
author Sofia Lanz
Gerald Seidel
Andrea Skrabl-Baumgartner
author_facet Sofia Lanz
Gerald Seidel
Andrea Skrabl-Baumgartner
author_sort Sofia Lanz
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Objective To assess the efficacy of golimumab (GLM) as a treatment option for juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA)-associated uveitis refractory to adalimumab (ADA). Methods Retrospective single-centre study including patients with JIA receiving GLM for active uveitis after failing ADA. JIA- and uveitis-related data, including intraocular inflammation, best-corrected visual acuity, corticosteroid-sparing potential, and ocular complications were evaluated at start of GLM treatment, at 1 month and 3 months, and every 3 months thereafter during GLM administration. We further investigated the association of response to GLM with primary and secondary failure of ADA treatment. Results Ten patients were studied, all female (17 affected eyes, mean age 14.3 + 6.7 yrs., mean follow-up 25.2 + 21.7 mos). Two patients were switched to GLM because of primary non-response to ADA. Eight were switched because of loss of response (LOR). In 5 of the latter LOR was associated with neutralizing anti-ADA-antibodies. Response to GLM was observed in all 8 patients with LOR, while the 2 patients with primary non-response to ADA also did not respond to GLM. Three of the 8 responders experienced LOR. At the end of follow-up 4 of the 5 remaining responders had achieved complete response. One had achieved partial response. Conclusion GLM is an efficacious therapeutic option in patients who experience LOR to ADA. Our data indicate that patients without primary response to ADA should be rather switched to a biologic agent with a different mode of action instead of further blocking the TNF-alpha pathway.
first_indexed 2024-12-17T00:24:26Z
format Article
id doaj.art-046e18723441420db6e86f09f0df8907
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1546-0096
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-17T00:24:26Z
publishDate 2021-08-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Pediatric Rheumatology Online Journal
spelling doaj.art-046e18723441420db6e86f09f0df89072022-12-21T22:10:30ZengBMCPediatric Rheumatology Online Journal1546-00962021-08-011911610.1186/s12969-021-00630-1Golimumab in juvenile idiopathic arthritis-associated uveitis unresponsive to AdalimumabSofia Lanz0Gerald Seidel1Andrea Skrabl-Baumgartner2Division of General Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Medical University GrazDepartment of Ophthalmology, Medical University GrazDivision of General Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Medical University GrazAbstract Objective To assess the efficacy of golimumab (GLM) as a treatment option for juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA)-associated uveitis refractory to adalimumab (ADA). Methods Retrospective single-centre study including patients with JIA receiving GLM for active uveitis after failing ADA. JIA- and uveitis-related data, including intraocular inflammation, best-corrected visual acuity, corticosteroid-sparing potential, and ocular complications were evaluated at start of GLM treatment, at 1 month and 3 months, and every 3 months thereafter during GLM administration. We further investigated the association of response to GLM with primary and secondary failure of ADA treatment. Results Ten patients were studied, all female (17 affected eyes, mean age 14.3 + 6.7 yrs., mean follow-up 25.2 + 21.7 mos). Two patients were switched to GLM because of primary non-response to ADA. Eight were switched because of loss of response (LOR). In 5 of the latter LOR was associated with neutralizing anti-ADA-antibodies. Response to GLM was observed in all 8 patients with LOR, while the 2 patients with primary non-response to ADA also did not respond to GLM. Three of the 8 responders experienced LOR. At the end of follow-up 4 of the 5 remaining responders had achieved complete response. One had achieved partial response. Conclusion GLM is an efficacious therapeutic option in patients who experience LOR to ADA. Our data indicate that patients without primary response to ADA should be rather switched to a biologic agent with a different mode of action instead of further blocking the TNF-alpha pathway.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12969-021-00630-1Juvenile idiopathic arthritisRefractory uveitisGolimumabAdalimumabTreatment failure
spellingShingle Sofia Lanz
Gerald Seidel
Andrea Skrabl-Baumgartner
Golimumab in juvenile idiopathic arthritis-associated uveitis unresponsive to Adalimumab
Pediatric Rheumatology Online Journal
Juvenile idiopathic arthritis
Refractory uveitis
Golimumab
Adalimumab
Treatment failure
title Golimumab in juvenile idiopathic arthritis-associated uveitis unresponsive to Adalimumab
title_full Golimumab in juvenile idiopathic arthritis-associated uveitis unresponsive to Adalimumab
title_fullStr Golimumab in juvenile idiopathic arthritis-associated uveitis unresponsive to Adalimumab
title_full_unstemmed Golimumab in juvenile idiopathic arthritis-associated uveitis unresponsive to Adalimumab
title_short Golimumab in juvenile idiopathic arthritis-associated uveitis unresponsive to Adalimumab
title_sort golimumab in juvenile idiopathic arthritis associated uveitis unresponsive to adalimumab
topic Juvenile idiopathic arthritis
Refractory uveitis
Golimumab
Adalimumab
Treatment failure
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12969-021-00630-1
work_keys_str_mv AT sofialanz golimumabinjuvenileidiopathicarthritisassociateduveitisunresponsivetoadalimumab
AT geraldseidel golimumabinjuvenileidiopathicarthritisassociateduveitisunresponsivetoadalimumab
AT andreaskrablbaumgartner golimumabinjuvenileidiopathicarthritisassociateduveitisunresponsivetoadalimumab