Inhibitory processes and cognitive flexibility: evidence for the theory of attentional inertia

The aim of this study was to discriminate the differential contribution of different inhibitory processes -perceptual, cognitive and behavioral inhibition- to switching cost effect associated with alternation cognitive tasks. A correlational design was used. Several experimental paradigms (e.g., St...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Isabel Introzzi, Lorena Canet-Juric, Silvana Montes, Soledad López, Graziella Mascarello
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidad de San Buenaventura 2015-07-01
Series:International Journal of Psychological Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/view/1510/1300
_version_ 1811245531776679936
author Isabel Introzzi
Lorena Canet-Juric
Silvana Montes
Soledad López
Graziella Mascarello
author_facet Isabel Introzzi
Lorena Canet-Juric
Silvana Montes
Soledad López
Graziella Mascarello
author_sort Isabel Introzzi
collection DOAJ
description The aim of this study was to discriminate the differential contribution of different inhibitory processes -perceptual, cognitive and behavioral inhibition- to switching cost effect associated with alternation cognitive tasks. A correlational design was used. Several experimental paradigms (e.g., Stop signal, visual search, Stemberg´s experimental and Simon paradigm) were adapted and included in a computerized program called TAC (Introzzi & Canet Juric, 2014) to the assessment of the different cognitive processes. The final sample consisted of 45 adults (18-50 years). Perceptual and behavioral inhibition shows moderate and low correlations with attentional cost, cognitive inhibition shows no relation with flexibility and only perceptual inhibition predicts switching costs effects, suggesting that different inhibitory processes contribute differentially to switch cost. This could be interpreted as evidence to Attentional Inertia Theory main argument which postulates that inhibition plays an essential role in the ability to flexibly switch between tasks and/or representations.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T14:40:21Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0471a457aa664cd7805ed67957cb9632
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2011-2084
2011-7922
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T14:40:21Z
publishDate 2015-07-01
publisher Universidad de San Buenaventura
record_format Article
series International Journal of Psychological Research
spelling doaj.art-0471a457aa664cd7805ed67957cb96322022-12-22T03:28:51ZengUniversidad de San BuenaventuraInternational Journal of Psychological Research2011-20842011-79222015-07-01826074Inhibitory processes and cognitive flexibility: evidence for the theory of attentional inertiaIsabel Introzzi0Lorena Canet-Juric1Silvana Montes2Soledad López3Graziella Mascarello4Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas CONICETConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas CONICETConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas CONICETConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas CONICETConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas CONICETThe aim of this study was to discriminate the differential contribution of different inhibitory processes -perceptual, cognitive and behavioral inhibition- to switching cost effect associated with alternation cognitive tasks. A correlational design was used. Several experimental paradigms (e.g., Stop signal, visual search, Stemberg´s experimental and Simon paradigm) were adapted and included in a computerized program called TAC (Introzzi & Canet Juric, 2014) to the assessment of the different cognitive processes. The final sample consisted of 45 adults (18-50 years). Perceptual and behavioral inhibition shows moderate and low correlations with attentional cost, cognitive inhibition shows no relation with flexibility and only perceptual inhibition predicts switching costs effects, suggesting that different inhibitory processes contribute differentially to switch cost. This could be interpreted as evidence to Attentional Inertia Theory main argument which postulates that inhibition plays an essential role in the ability to flexibly switch between tasks and/or representations.http://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/view/1510/1300Inhibitory processcognitive flexibilityAttentional Inertia Theory
spellingShingle Isabel Introzzi
Lorena Canet-Juric
Silvana Montes
Soledad López
Graziella Mascarello
Inhibitory processes and cognitive flexibility: evidence for the theory of attentional inertia
International Journal of Psychological Research
Inhibitory process
cognitive flexibility
Attentional Inertia Theory
title Inhibitory processes and cognitive flexibility: evidence for the theory of attentional inertia
title_full Inhibitory processes and cognitive flexibility: evidence for the theory of attentional inertia
title_fullStr Inhibitory processes and cognitive flexibility: evidence for the theory of attentional inertia
title_full_unstemmed Inhibitory processes and cognitive flexibility: evidence for the theory of attentional inertia
title_short Inhibitory processes and cognitive flexibility: evidence for the theory of attentional inertia
title_sort inhibitory processes and cognitive flexibility evidence for the theory of attentional inertia
topic Inhibitory process
cognitive flexibility
Attentional Inertia Theory
url http://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/view/1510/1300
work_keys_str_mv AT isabelintrozzi inhibitoryprocessesandcognitiveflexibilityevidenceforthetheoryofattentionalinertia
AT lorenacanetjuric inhibitoryprocessesandcognitiveflexibilityevidenceforthetheoryofattentionalinertia
AT silvanamontes inhibitoryprocessesandcognitiveflexibilityevidenceforthetheoryofattentionalinertia
AT soledadlopez inhibitoryprocessesandcognitiveflexibilityevidenceforthetheoryofattentionalinertia
AT graziellamascarello inhibitoryprocessesandcognitiveflexibilityevidenceforthetheoryofattentionalinertia