Safety of spinal anesthesia and analysis of cerebrospinal fluid in SARS-CoV-2 pregnant women undergoing cesarean section: an observational prospective study

Abstract Background Systemic infection has always been considered a relative contraindication to neuraxial anesthesia, despite the fact that infectious complications are relatively uncommon. Pregnancy-related physiological changes and coronavirus disease (COVID-19) neurotropic features may facilitat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Giulia Fierro, Barbara Milan, Silvia Bettinelli, Elisa Bottari, Dario Bugada, Ilaria Roncagliolo, Marco Arosio, Claudio Farina, Ferdinando Luca Lorini
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2023-11-01
Series:Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s44158-023-00135-1
_version_ 1797413630138908672
author Giulia Fierro
Barbara Milan
Silvia Bettinelli
Elisa Bottari
Dario Bugada
Ilaria Roncagliolo
Marco Arosio
Claudio Farina
Ferdinando Luca Lorini
author_facet Giulia Fierro
Barbara Milan
Silvia Bettinelli
Elisa Bottari
Dario Bugada
Ilaria Roncagliolo
Marco Arosio
Claudio Farina
Ferdinando Luca Lorini
author_sort Giulia Fierro
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Systemic infection has always been considered a relative contraindication to neuraxial anesthesia, despite the fact that infectious complications are relatively uncommon. Pregnancy-related physiological changes and coronavirus disease (COVID-19) neurotropic features may facilitate the virus’ entry into the central nervous system. The principal aim of this study was to test the safety of spinal anesthesia in “severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2” (SARS-CoV-2)-positive pregnant women and to examine cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) characteristics. Methods We conducted a prospective observational single-center study in asymptomatic or paucisymptomatic consecutive pregnant SARS-CoV-2 patients who underwent spinal anesthesia for cesarean section. Women with severe infection were excluded because they underwent general anesthesia. At the time of spinal anesthesia, we collected CSF samples, and then we performed a chemical-physical analysis to look for signs of inflammation and for SARS-CoV-2 genome. Results We included 26 women. No spinal anesthesia complications were reported in the perioperative period and after 2 months. All CSF samples were crystal clear, and all physical-chemical values were within physiological ranges: the median concentration of CSF/plasma glucose ratio was 0.66, IQR 0.5500 (0.6000–0.7100), and the average CSF protein concentration value was 23.2 mg/dl (SD 4.87). In all samples, genomes of SARS-CoV-2 and other neurotropic viruses were not detected. Conclusions Spinal anesthesia was safe in SARS-CoV-2 pregnant women with mild disease; no clinical maternal complications were detected, and no CSF changes indicative of inflammatory or infectious diseases that would compromise the safety of the procedure were found.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T05:21:48Z
format Article
id doaj.art-047815d9342e44419d047dc5b4caff48
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2731-3786
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T05:21:48Z
publishDate 2023-11-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care
spelling doaj.art-047815d9342e44419d047dc5b4caff482023-12-03T12:40:04ZengBMCJournal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care2731-37862023-11-01311810.1186/s44158-023-00135-1Safety of spinal anesthesia and analysis of cerebrospinal fluid in SARS-CoV-2 pregnant women undergoing cesarean section: an observational prospective studyGiulia Fierro0Barbara Milan1Silvia Bettinelli2Elisa Bottari3Dario Bugada4Ilaria Roncagliolo5Marco Arosio6Claudio Farina7Ferdinando Luca Lorini8Department of Emergency and Intensive Care, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIIIDepartment of Emergency and Intensive Care, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIIIDepartment of Emergency and Intensive Care, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIIIDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, Royal Brompton HospitalDepartment of Emergency and Intensive Care, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIIIDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, University of MilanMicrobiology and Virology Laboratory, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIIIMicrobiology and Virology Laboratory, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIIIDepartment of Emergency and Intensive Care, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIIIAbstract Background Systemic infection has always been considered a relative contraindication to neuraxial anesthesia, despite the fact that infectious complications are relatively uncommon. Pregnancy-related physiological changes and coronavirus disease (COVID-19) neurotropic features may facilitate the virus’ entry into the central nervous system. The principal aim of this study was to test the safety of spinal anesthesia in “severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2” (SARS-CoV-2)-positive pregnant women and to examine cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) characteristics. Methods We conducted a prospective observational single-center study in asymptomatic or paucisymptomatic consecutive pregnant SARS-CoV-2 patients who underwent spinal anesthesia for cesarean section. Women with severe infection were excluded because they underwent general anesthesia. At the time of spinal anesthesia, we collected CSF samples, and then we performed a chemical-physical analysis to look for signs of inflammation and for SARS-CoV-2 genome. Results We included 26 women. No spinal anesthesia complications were reported in the perioperative period and after 2 months. All CSF samples were crystal clear, and all physical-chemical values were within physiological ranges: the median concentration of CSF/plasma glucose ratio was 0.66, IQR 0.5500 (0.6000–0.7100), and the average CSF protein concentration value was 23.2 mg/dl (SD 4.87). In all samples, genomes of SARS-CoV-2 and other neurotropic viruses were not detected. Conclusions Spinal anesthesia was safe in SARS-CoV-2 pregnant women with mild disease; no clinical maternal complications were detected, and no CSF changes indicative of inflammatory or infectious diseases that would compromise the safety of the procedure were found.https://doi.org/10.1186/s44158-023-00135-1PregnancySARS-CoV-2Spinal anesthesiaCerebrospinal fluidChemical-physical analysis
spellingShingle Giulia Fierro
Barbara Milan
Silvia Bettinelli
Elisa Bottari
Dario Bugada
Ilaria Roncagliolo
Marco Arosio
Claudio Farina
Ferdinando Luca Lorini
Safety of spinal anesthesia and analysis of cerebrospinal fluid in SARS-CoV-2 pregnant women undergoing cesarean section: an observational prospective study
Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care
Pregnancy
SARS-CoV-2
Spinal anesthesia
Cerebrospinal fluid
Chemical-physical analysis
title Safety of spinal anesthesia and analysis of cerebrospinal fluid in SARS-CoV-2 pregnant women undergoing cesarean section: an observational prospective study
title_full Safety of spinal anesthesia and analysis of cerebrospinal fluid in SARS-CoV-2 pregnant women undergoing cesarean section: an observational prospective study
title_fullStr Safety of spinal anesthesia and analysis of cerebrospinal fluid in SARS-CoV-2 pregnant women undergoing cesarean section: an observational prospective study
title_full_unstemmed Safety of spinal anesthesia and analysis of cerebrospinal fluid in SARS-CoV-2 pregnant women undergoing cesarean section: an observational prospective study
title_short Safety of spinal anesthesia and analysis of cerebrospinal fluid in SARS-CoV-2 pregnant women undergoing cesarean section: an observational prospective study
title_sort safety of spinal anesthesia and analysis of cerebrospinal fluid in sars cov 2 pregnant women undergoing cesarean section an observational prospective study
topic Pregnancy
SARS-CoV-2
Spinal anesthesia
Cerebrospinal fluid
Chemical-physical analysis
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s44158-023-00135-1
work_keys_str_mv AT giuliafierro safetyofspinalanesthesiaandanalysisofcerebrospinalfluidinsarscov2pregnantwomenundergoingcesareansectionanobservationalprospectivestudy
AT barbaramilan safetyofspinalanesthesiaandanalysisofcerebrospinalfluidinsarscov2pregnantwomenundergoingcesareansectionanobservationalprospectivestudy
AT silviabettinelli safetyofspinalanesthesiaandanalysisofcerebrospinalfluidinsarscov2pregnantwomenundergoingcesareansectionanobservationalprospectivestudy
AT elisabottari safetyofspinalanesthesiaandanalysisofcerebrospinalfluidinsarscov2pregnantwomenundergoingcesareansectionanobservationalprospectivestudy
AT dariobugada safetyofspinalanesthesiaandanalysisofcerebrospinalfluidinsarscov2pregnantwomenundergoingcesareansectionanobservationalprospectivestudy
AT ilariaroncagliolo safetyofspinalanesthesiaandanalysisofcerebrospinalfluidinsarscov2pregnantwomenundergoingcesareansectionanobservationalprospectivestudy
AT marcoarosio safetyofspinalanesthesiaandanalysisofcerebrospinalfluidinsarscov2pregnantwomenundergoingcesareansectionanobservationalprospectivestudy
AT claudiofarina safetyofspinalanesthesiaandanalysisofcerebrospinalfluidinsarscov2pregnantwomenundergoingcesareansectionanobservationalprospectivestudy
AT ferdinandolucalorini safetyofspinalanesthesiaandanalysisofcerebrospinalfluidinsarscov2pregnantwomenundergoingcesareansectionanobservationalprospectivestudy