High positive computed tomography yields in the emergency department might not be a positive finding

Background. There is growing pressure to reduce unnecessary computed tomography (CT) imaging requests that the radiology department receives from the emergency department (ED); however, information on acceptable usage rates and diagnostic yields remains scanty.Objectives. To describe the indications...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: K Swartzberg, L Goldstein
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: South African Medical Association 2018-03-01
Series:South African Medical Journal
Online Access:http://www.samj.org.za/index.php/samj/article/download/12216/8400
_version_ 1797370055183302656
author K Swartzberg
L Goldstein
author_facet K Swartzberg
L Goldstein
author_sort K Swartzberg
collection DOAJ
description Background. There is growing pressure to reduce unnecessary computed tomography (CT) imaging requests that the radiology department receives from the emergency department (ED); however, information on acceptable usage rates and diagnostic yields remains scanty.Objectives. To describe the indications, clinical categories and positive yield rates of patients receiving CT scans in the ED.Methods. A retrospective record review was done of all patients who received CT scans at an urban, adult academic ED during a 4-month period. Primary outcomes were to establish CT scan usage and positive yield rates. Other outcomes included analysis of indications, demographics and anatomical areas scanned.Results. Scans (n=1 010) were analysed. The median age of patients was 36 (range 4 - 93) years. Male patients received 64.3% of all scans, as well as 75.7% of the scans performed for trauma. The majority of the scans were for trauma patients. However, non-trauma patients had a higher positive yield; the non-trauma positive yield rate was 61.8% compared with the trauma positive yield rate of 47.1% (p<0.001). The majority of scans performed were of the head (58%) and neck (20%), with lowest positive yield rates of 48.9% and 17%, respectively. The overall CT scan usage rate was 4.6% and overall positive rate 53.8%.Conclusion. A negative CT scan does not necessarily mean that the test was not indicated. Higher positive yield rates may reflect insufficient use of CT scanning by the ED. Local guidelines should be established to ensure judicious and effective clinical use of CT scans.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T17:55:51Z
format Article
id doaj.art-048d87b205a249879857e867163186ba
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0256-9574
2078-5135
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T17:55:51Z
publishDate 2018-03-01
publisher South African Medical Association
record_format Article
series South African Medical Journal
spelling doaj.art-048d87b205a249879857e867163186ba2024-01-02T04:33:35ZengSouth African Medical AssociationSouth African Medical Journal0256-95742078-51352018-03-01108323023410.7196/SAMJ.2018.v108i3.12635High positive computed tomography yields in the emergency department might not be a positive findingK SwartzbergL GoldsteinBackground. There is growing pressure to reduce unnecessary computed tomography (CT) imaging requests that the radiology department receives from the emergency department (ED); however, information on acceptable usage rates and diagnostic yields remains scanty.Objectives. To describe the indications, clinical categories and positive yield rates of patients receiving CT scans in the ED.Methods. A retrospective record review was done of all patients who received CT scans at an urban, adult academic ED during a 4-month period. Primary outcomes were to establish CT scan usage and positive yield rates. Other outcomes included analysis of indications, demographics and anatomical areas scanned.Results. Scans (n=1 010) were analysed. The median age of patients was 36 (range 4 - 93) years. Male patients received 64.3% of all scans, as well as 75.7% of the scans performed for trauma. The majority of the scans were for trauma patients. However, non-trauma patients had a higher positive yield; the non-trauma positive yield rate was 61.8% compared with the trauma positive yield rate of 47.1% (p<0.001). The majority of scans performed were of the head (58%) and neck (20%), with lowest positive yield rates of 48.9% and 17%, respectively. The overall CT scan usage rate was 4.6% and overall positive rate 53.8%.Conclusion. A negative CT scan does not necessarily mean that the test was not indicated. Higher positive yield rates may reflect insufficient use of CT scanning by the ED. Local guidelines should be established to ensure judicious and effective clinical use of CT scans.http://www.samj.org.za/index.php/samj/article/download/12216/8400
spellingShingle K Swartzberg
L Goldstein
High positive computed tomography yields in the emergency department might not be a positive finding
South African Medical Journal
title High positive computed tomography yields in the emergency department might not be a positive finding
title_full High positive computed tomography yields in the emergency department might not be a positive finding
title_fullStr High positive computed tomography yields in the emergency department might not be a positive finding
title_full_unstemmed High positive computed tomography yields in the emergency department might not be a positive finding
title_short High positive computed tomography yields in the emergency department might not be a positive finding
title_sort high positive computed tomography yields in the emergency department might not be a positive finding
url http://www.samj.org.za/index.php/samj/article/download/12216/8400
work_keys_str_mv AT kswartzberg highpositivecomputedtomographyyieldsintheemergencydepartmentmightnotbeapositivefinding
AT lgoldstein highpositivecomputedtomographyyieldsintheemergencydepartmentmightnotbeapositivefinding