"Clicks, likes, shares and comments" a systematic review of breast cancer screening discourse in social media.
BACKGROUND:Unsatisfactory participation rate at population based organised breast cancer screening is a long standing problem. Social media, with 3.2 billion users in 2019, is potentially an important site of breast cancer related discourse. Determining whether these platforms might be used as chann...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2020-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231422 |
| _version_ | 1818729648755834880 |
|---|---|
| author | Bence Döbrössy Edmond Girasek Anna Susánszky Zsuzsa Koncz Zsuzsa Győrffy Virág Katalin Bognár |
| author_facet | Bence Döbrössy Edmond Girasek Anna Susánszky Zsuzsa Koncz Zsuzsa Győrffy Virág Katalin Bognár |
| author_sort | Bence Döbrössy |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | BACKGROUND:Unsatisfactory participation rate at population based organised breast cancer screening is a long standing problem. Social media, with 3.2 billion users in 2019, is potentially an important site of breast cancer related discourse. Determining whether these platforms might be used as channels by screening providers to reach under-screened women may have considerable public health significance. OBJECTIVES:By systematically reviewing original research studies on breast cancer related social media discourse, we had two aims: first, to assess the volume, participants and content of breast screening social media communication and second, to find out whether social media can be used by screening organisers as a channel of patient education. METHODS:We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). After searching PubMed, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, Springer and Ebsco, 17 studies were found that met our criteria. A systematic narrative framework was used for data synthesis. Owing to the high degree of heterogeneity in social media channels, outcomes and measurement included in this study, a meta-analytic approach was not appropriate. RESULTS:The volume of breast cancer related social media discourse is considerable. The majority of participants are lay individuals as opposed to healthcare professionals or advocacy groups. The lay misunderstandings surrounding the harms and benefits of mammography is well mirrored in the content of social media discourse. Although there is criticism, breast cancer screening sentiment on the social media ranges from the neutral to the positive. Social media is suitable for offering peer emotional support for potential participants. CONCLUSION:Dedicated breast screening websites operated by screening organisers would ensure much needed quality controlled information and also provide space for reliable question and answer forums, the sharing of personal experience and the provision of peer and professional support. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-17T22:49:14Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-0494937d942548e69b81d839a4eeb72d |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1932-6203 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-17T22:49:14Z |
| publishDate | 2020-01-01 |
| publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | PLoS ONE |
| spelling | doaj.art-0494937d942548e69b81d839a4eeb72d2022-12-21T21:29:43ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032020-01-01154e023142210.1371/journal.pone.0231422"Clicks, likes, shares and comments" a systematic review of breast cancer screening discourse in social media.Bence DöbrössyEdmond GirasekAnna SusánszkyZsuzsa KonczZsuzsa GyőrffyVirág Katalin BognárBACKGROUND:Unsatisfactory participation rate at population based organised breast cancer screening is a long standing problem. Social media, with 3.2 billion users in 2019, is potentially an important site of breast cancer related discourse. Determining whether these platforms might be used as channels by screening providers to reach under-screened women may have considerable public health significance. OBJECTIVES:By systematically reviewing original research studies on breast cancer related social media discourse, we had two aims: first, to assess the volume, participants and content of breast screening social media communication and second, to find out whether social media can be used by screening organisers as a channel of patient education. METHODS:We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). After searching PubMed, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, Springer and Ebsco, 17 studies were found that met our criteria. A systematic narrative framework was used for data synthesis. Owing to the high degree of heterogeneity in social media channels, outcomes and measurement included in this study, a meta-analytic approach was not appropriate. RESULTS:The volume of breast cancer related social media discourse is considerable. The majority of participants are lay individuals as opposed to healthcare professionals or advocacy groups. The lay misunderstandings surrounding the harms and benefits of mammography is well mirrored in the content of social media discourse. Although there is criticism, breast cancer screening sentiment on the social media ranges from the neutral to the positive. Social media is suitable for offering peer emotional support for potential participants. CONCLUSION:Dedicated breast screening websites operated by screening organisers would ensure much needed quality controlled information and also provide space for reliable question and answer forums, the sharing of personal experience and the provision of peer and professional support.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231422 |
| spellingShingle | Bence Döbrössy Edmond Girasek Anna Susánszky Zsuzsa Koncz Zsuzsa Győrffy Virág Katalin Bognár "Clicks, likes, shares and comments" a systematic review of breast cancer screening discourse in social media. PLoS ONE |
| title | "Clicks, likes, shares and comments" a systematic review of breast cancer screening discourse in social media. |
| title_full | "Clicks, likes, shares and comments" a systematic review of breast cancer screening discourse in social media. |
| title_fullStr | "Clicks, likes, shares and comments" a systematic review of breast cancer screening discourse in social media. |
| title_full_unstemmed | "Clicks, likes, shares and comments" a systematic review of breast cancer screening discourse in social media. |
| title_short | "Clicks, likes, shares and comments" a systematic review of breast cancer screening discourse in social media. |
| title_sort | clicks likes shares and comments a systematic review of breast cancer screening discourse in social media |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231422 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT bencedobrossy clickslikessharesandcommentsasystematicreviewofbreastcancerscreeningdiscourseinsocialmedia AT edmondgirasek clickslikessharesandcommentsasystematicreviewofbreastcancerscreeningdiscourseinsocialmedia AT annasusanszky clickslikessharesandcommentsasystematicreviewofbreastcancerscreeningdiscourseinsocialmedia AT zsuzsakoncz clickslikessharesandcommentsasystematicreviewofbreastcancerscreeningdiscourseinsocialmedia AT zsuzsagyorffy clickslikessharesandcommentsasystematicreviewofbreastcancerscreeningdiscourseinsocialmedia AT viragkatalinbognar clickslikessharesandcommentsasystematicreviewofbreastcancerscreeningdiscourseinsocialmedia |