Validated age and growth of Barred Sand Bass within the Southern California Bight

The recreational fishery for Barred Sand Bass (Paralabrax nebulifer) has recently shown declines in catch prompting a need for updating life-history attributes. The objective of this study was to provide a more extensive and current examination of Barred Sand Bass age and growth. Fish were collec...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kimberly M. Walker, Kimberly M. Pentilla, Erica T. Jarvis-Mason, Charles F. Valle
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: California Department of Fish and Wildlife 2020-12-01
Series:California Fish and Wildlife Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentID=187247&inline
_version_ 1797782934689677312
author Kimberly M. Walker
Kimberly M. Pentilla
Erica T. Jarvis-Mason
Charles F. Valle
author_facet Kimberly M. Walker
Kimberly M. Pentilla
Erica T. Jarvis-Mason
Charles F. Valle
author_sort Kimberly M. Walker
collection DOAJ
description The recreational fishery for Barred Sand Bass (Paralabrax nebulifer) has recently shown declines in catch prompting a need for updating life-history attributes. The objective of this study was to provide a more extensive and current examination of Barred Sand Bass age and growth. Fish were collected from the southern California bight from 2011 to 2015. Using Akaike Information Criteria analysis we determined that the three-parameter von Bertalanffy growth model was the best fit out of the four tested models (Gompertz, Logistic, Power, and von Bertalanffy). Males grew slightly quicker than females (k, males = 0.10, females = 0.08). Males and females did not differ in length, weight, or the length-weight relationship. We also validated yearly banding of Barred Sand Bass with oxytetracycline marking of two fish in captivity for one year. Location of the first annulus was also validated with otolith diameter measurements. Finally, we compared the current study to a past 1990’s study and observed different growth parameters. The growth difference after thirty years showed that possible fishing pressure and environmental factors might have influenced changes in growth. This study provides current information on age, growth over time and, otolith morphometrics, for Barred Sand Bass.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T00:18:58Z
format Article
id doaj.art-04959c91ba6f44fa96dc8fc431a13776
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2689-419X
2689-4203
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T00:18:58Z
publishDate 2020-12-01
publisher California Department of Fish and Wildlife
record_format Article
series California Fish and Wildlife Journal
spelling doaj.art-04959c91ba6f44fa96dc8fc431a137762023-07-11T17:10:18ZengCalifornia Department of Fish and WildlifeCalifornia Fish and Wildlife Journal2689-419X2689-42032020-12-01106420522010.51492/cfwj.106.19Validated age and growth of Barred Sand Bass within the Southern California BightKimberly M. Walker0Kimberly M. Pentilla1Erica T. Jarvis-Mason2https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3366-157XCharles F. Valle3California Department of Fish and WildlifeCalifornia Department of Fish and WildlifeScripps Institute of Oceanography, University of California, San DiegoCalifornia Department of Fish and WildlifeThe recreational fishery for Barred Sand Bass (Paralabrax nebulifer) has recently shown declines in catch prompting a need for updating life-history attributes. The objective of this study was to provide a more extensive and current examination of Barred Sand Bass age and growth. Fish were collected from the southern California bight from 2011 to 2015. Using Akaike Information Criteria analysis we determined that the three-parameter von Bertalanffy growth model was the best fit out of the four tested models (Gompertz, Logistic, Power, and von Bertalanffy). Males grew slightly quicker than females (k, males = 0.10, females = 0.08). Males and females did not differ in length, weight, or the length-weight relationship. We also validated yearly banding of Barred Sand Bass with oxytetracycline marking of two fish in captivity for one year. Location of the first annulus was also validated with otolith diameter measurements. Finally, we compared the current study to a past 1990’s study and observed different growth parameters. The growth difference after thirty years showed that possible fishing pressure and environmental factors might have influenced changes in growth. This study provides current information on age, growth over time and, otolith morphometrics, for Barred Sand Bass. https://nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentID=187247&inlineage estimationage validationparalabrax nebuliferbarred sand bassgrowthotolith
spellingShingle Kimberly M. Walker
Kimberly M. Pentilla
Erica T. Jarvis-Mason
Charles F. Valle
Validated age and growth of Barred Sand Bass within the Southern California Bight
California Fish and Wildlife Journal
age estimation
age validation
paralabrax nebulifer
barred sand bass
growth
otolith
title Validated age and growth of Barred Sand Bass within the Southern California Bight
title_full Validated age and growth of Barred Sand Bass within the Southern California Bight
title_fullStr Validated age and growth of Barred Sand Bass within the Southern California Bight
title_full_unstemmed Validated age and growth of Barred Sand Bass within the Southern California Bight
title_short Validated age and growth of Barred Sand Bass within the Southern California Bight
title_sort validated age and growth of barred sand bass within the southern california bight
topic age estimation
age validation
paralabrax nebulifer
barred sand bass
growth
otolith
url https://nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentID=187247&inline
work_keys_str_mv AT kimberlymwalker validatedageandgrowthofbarredsandbasswithinthesoutherncaliforniabight
AT kimberlympentilla validatedageandgrowthofbarredsandbasswithinthesoutherncaliforniabight
AT ericatjarvismason validatedageandgrowthofbarredsandbasswithinthesoutherncaliforniabight
AT charlesfvalle validatedageandgrowthofbarredsandbasswithinthesoutherncaliforniabight