Discrepancy between Era and Writing: A Critical look at “Christine and Keed’’

For a long time, the development of artistic creative paradigms has not been necessarily simultaneous with the emerging social changes in Iranian society. In spite of the fact that the emergence of Iranian novels was due to the social changes, novel is generally considered to be an imported literary...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Esmat Esmaeili, Seyyed Razzagh Razavian
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Allameh Tabataba'i University Press 2015-11-01
Series:Matn/Pizhūhī-i Adabī
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ltr.atu.ac.ir/article_2184_842e65b6abecb88229f3d0c74cd8d62f.pdf
_version_ 1797375980023578624
author Esmat Esmaeili
Seyyed Razzagh Razavian
author_facet Esmat Esmaeili
Seyyed Razzagh Razavian
author_sort Esmat Esmaeili
collection DOAJ
description For a long time, the development of artistic creative paradigms has not been necessarily simultaneous with the emerging social changes in Iranian society. In spite of the fact that the emergence of Iranian novels was due to the social changes, novel is generally considered to be an imported literary genre rather than a traditional Iranian trend, which found its way into the system of Persian literature mainly as a result of translation. Moreover, the principles of modern aesthetics have not been in tune with the accepted norms of Iranian literary community. The novel "Christine and Keed" By H. Golshiri due to its unintelligible content and form and lack of social themes is considered by many critics to be missing a natural and logical continuation of his era’s writing, which has deviated from the coordinated norms of literary community. More clearly, Iranian novel has been an imitation of western literary works in terms of form and figures of speech and the context of the story has not been a product of real situational and social contexts in Iran. This discrepancy caused the novel not to be generally favored among its readers and critics at the time of its publication. However, several decades after the publication, it was faced with a relative acceptance by its readers and critics because of the advances in criticism and literary theories, innovative experiences in fiction, and writers’ passion for modern and progressive movements. This paper aims at providing an innovative explanation of this novel based on the principles of Nouveau.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T19:32:03Z
format Article
id doaj.art-04bf2942e6c44ff3a0c95300343e643d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2251-7138
2476-6186
language fas
last_indexed 2024-03-08T19:32:03Z
publishDate 2015-11-01
publisher Allameh Tabataba'i University Press
record_format Article
series Matn/Pizhūhī-i Adabī
spelling doaj.art-04bf2942e6c44ff3a0c95300343e643d2023-12-26T07:39:50ZfasAllameh Tabataba'i University PressMatn/Pizhūhī-i Adabī2251-71382476-61862015-11-01196523522184Discrepancy between Era and Writing: A Critical look at “Christine and Keed’’Esmat Esmaeili0Seyyed Razzagh Razavian1دانشیار دانشگاه سمناندانش‌آموختة دکتری زبان و ادبیّات فارسی دانشگاه سمنانFor a long time, the development of artistic creative paradigms has not been necessarily simultaneous with the emerging social changes in Iranian society. In spite of the fact that the emergence of Iranian novels was due to the social changes, novel is generally considered to be an imported literary genre rather than a traditional Iranian trend, which found its way into the system of Persian literature mainly as a result of translation. Moreover, the principles of modern aesthetics have not been in tune with the accepted norms of Iranian literary community. The novel "Christine and Keed" By H. Golshiri due to its unintelligible content and form and lack of social themes is considered by many critics to be missing a natural and logical continuation of his era’s writing, which has deviated from the coordinated norms of literary community. More clearly, Iranian novel has been an imitation of western literary works in terms of form and figures of speech and the context of the story has not been a product of real situational and social contexts in Iran. This discrepancy caused the novel not to be generally favored among its readers and critics at the time of its publication. However, several decades after the publication, it was faced with a relative acceptance by its readers and critics because of the advances in criticism and literary theories, innovative experiences in fiction, and writers’ passion for modern and progressive movements. This paper aims at providing an innovative explanation of this novel based on the principles of Nouveau.https://ltr.atu.ac.ir/article_2184_842e65b6abecb88229f3d0c74cd8d62f.pdfchristine and keedhoushang golshirinouveaucontemporary persian fictionera and writing
spellingShingle Esmat Esmaeili
Seyyed Razzagh Razavian
Discrepancy between Era and Writing: A Critical look at “Christine and Keed’’
Matn/Pizhūhī-i Adabī
christine and keed
houshang golshiri
nouveau
contemporary persian fiction
era and writing
title Discrepancy between Era and Writing: A Critical look at “Christine and Keed’’
title_full Discrepancy between Era and Writing: A Critical look at “Christine and Keed’’
title_fullStr Discrepancy between Era and Writing: A Critical look at “Christine and Keed’’
title_full_unstemmed Discrepancy between Era and Writing: A Critical look at “Christine and Keed’’
title_short Discrepancy between Era and Writing: A Critical look at “Christine and Keed’’
title_sort discrepancy between era and writing a critical look at christine and keed
topic christine and keed
houshang golshiri
nouveau
contemporary persian fiction
era and writing
url https://ltr.atu.ac.ir/article_2184_842e65b6abecb88229f3d0c74cd8d62f.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT esmatesmaeili discrepancybetweeneraandwritingacriticallookatchristineandkeed
AT seyyedrazzaghrazavian discrepancybetweeneraandwritingacriticallookatchristineandkeed