Thoracoscopic esophageal drainage for tracheal compression due to mucocele after esophagogastric bypass: a case report

Abstract Background Esophagogastric bypass is performed for esophageal strictures. Mucus retention, known as mucocele, sometimes occurs at the stricture oral side of the remnant esophagus. It is often asymptomatic and is expected to be naturally decompressed, but it may cause respiratory failure dep...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Takeshi Yamashita, Koji Otsuka, Satoru Goto, Tomotake Ariyoshi, Kentaro Motegi, Masahiro Kohmoto, Akira Saito, Koichiro Fujimasa, Yoshihito Sato, Rei Kato, Tetsuo Sawatani, Masahiko Murakami
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2023-06-01
Series:Surgical Case Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40792-023-01693-w
_version_ 1797801216690880512
author Takeshi Yamashita
Koji Otsuka
Satoru Goto
Tomotake Ariyoshi
Kentaro Motegi
Masahiro Kohmoto
Akira Saito
Koichiro Fujimasa
Yoshihito Sato
Rei Kato
Tetsuo Sawatani
Masahiko Murakami
author_facet Takeshi Yamashita
Koji Otsuka
Satoru Goto
Tomotake Ariyoshi
Kentaro Motegi
Masahiro Kohmoto
Akira Saito
Koichiro Fujimasa
Yoshihito Sato
Rei Kato
Tetsuo Sawatani
Masahiko Murakami
author_sort Takeshi Yamashita
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Esophagogastric bypass is performed for esophageal strictures. Mucus retention, known as mucocele, sometimes occurs at the stricture oral side of the remnant esophagus. It is often asymptomatic and is expected to be naturally decompressed, but it may cause respiratory failure depending on the case. Herein, we report a case in which we successfully performed thoracoscopic esophageal drainage as emergency airway management due to tracheal compression by a mucocele after esophagogastric bypass for unresectable esophageal cancer with esophagobronchial fistula. Case presentation A 56-year-old man underwent esophageal bypass surgery for an unresectable esophageal carcinoma with an esophagobronchial fistula following chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Nine months after bypass surgery, he experienced severe dyspnea due to tracheal compression caused by mucus retention on the oral side of the esophageal tumor. We planned thoracoscopic surgery for mucus retention drainage through the right thoracic cavity to secure the airway as an emergency procedure under general anesthesia. Intubation can be performed safely by guiding bronchoscopy in the semi-supine position. Upper esophageal dilation was observed on the cranial side of the azygos arch. We dissected the mediastinal pleura of the upper thoracic esophagus and exposed its wall. A 12-Fr silicone drain was placed in the esophagus through the right chest wall and 120 ml of white fluid was aspirated. He was discharged 9 days after surgery without complications and resumed treatment with an immune checkpoint inhibitor 23 days after surgery. Thereafter, he continued chemotherapy for esophageal cancer, but died of tumor progression and lung metastasis 35 months after bypass surgery and 25 months after thoracoscopic surgery. Conclusions Thoracoscopic esophageal drainage could be performed safely as emergency airway management, shorten the period of discontinuance, and allow cancer treatment to be resumed promptly. We believe that this thoracoscopic procedure is an effective and less invasive method if the percutaneous approach is difficult.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T04:47:05Z
format Article
id doaj.art-04c52ac577c2475ca212a434c299f1c7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2198-7793
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T04:47:05Z
publishDate 2023-06-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series Surgical Case Reports
spelling doaj.art-04c52ac577c2475ca212a434c299f1c72023-06-18T11:23:32ZengSpringerOpenSurgical Case Reports2198-77932023-06-01911510.1186/s40792-023-01693-wThoracoscopic esophageal drainage for tracheal compression due to mucocele after esophagogastric bypass: a case reportTakeshi Yamashita0Koji Otsuka1Satoru Goto2Tomotake Ariyoshi3Kentaro Motegi4Masahiro Kohmoto5Akira Saito6Koichiro Fujimasa7Yoshihito Sato8Rei Kato9Tetsuo Sawatani10Masahiko Murakami11Esophageal Cancer Center, Showa University HospitalEsophageal Cancer Center, Showa University HospitalEsophageal Cancer Center, Showa University HospitalEsophageal Cancer Center, Showa University HospitalEsophageal Cancer Center, Showa University HospitalEsophageal Cancer Center, Showa University HospitalEsophageal Cancer Center, Showa University HospitalEsophageal Cancer Center, Showa University HospitalEsophageal Cancer Center, Showa University HospitalEsophageal Cancer Center, Showa University HospitalEsophageal Cancer Center, Showa University HospitalEsophageal Cancer Center, Showa University HospitalAbstract Background Esophagogastric bypass is performed for esophageal strictures. Mucus retention, known as mucocele, sometimes occurs at the stricture oral side of the remnant esophagus. It is often asymptomatic and is expected to be naturally decompressed, but it may cause respiratory failure depending on the case. Herein, we report a case in which we successfully performed thoracoscopic esophageal drainage as emergency airway management due to tracheal compression by a mucocele after esophagogastric bypass for unresectable esophageal cancer with esophagobronchial fistula. Case presentation A 56-year-old man underwent esophageal bypass surgery for an unresectable esophageal carcinoma with an esophagobronchial fistula following chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Nine months after bypass surgery, he experienced severe dyspnea due to tracheal compression caused by mucus retention on the oral side of the esophageal tumor. We planned thoracoscopic surgery for mucus retention drainage through the right thoracic cavity to secure the airway as an emergency procedure under general anesthesia. Intubation can be performed safely by guiding bronchoscopy in the semi-supine position. Upper esophageal dilation was observed on the cranial side of the azygos arch. We dissected the mediastinal pleura of the upper thoracic esophagus and exposed its wall. A 12-Fr silicone drain was placed in the esophagus through the right chest wall and 120 ml of white fluid was aspirated. He was discharged 9 days after surgery without complications and resumed treatment with an immune checkpoint inhibitor 23 days after surgery. Thereafter, he continued chemotherapy for esophageal cancer, but died of tumor progression and lung metastasis 35 months after bypass surgery and 25 months after thoracoscopic surgery. Conclusions Thoracoscopic esophageal drainage could be performed safely as emergency airway management, shorten the period of discontinuance, and allow cancer treatment to be resumed promptly. We believe that this thoracoscopic procedure is an effective and less invasive method if the percutaneous approach is difficult.https://doi.org/10.1186/s40792-023-01693-wBypass surgeryEsophageal cancerThoracoscopic drainage
spellingShingle Takeshi Yamashita
Koji Otsuka
Satoru Goto
Tomotake Ariyoshi
Kentaro Motegi
Masahiro Kohmoto
Akira Saito
Koichiro Fujimasa
Yoshihito Sato
Rei Kato
Tetsuo Sawatani
Masahiko Murakami
Thoracoscopic esophageal drainage for tracheal compression due to mucocele after esophagogastric bypass: a case report
Surgical Case Reports
Bypass surgery
Esophageal cancer
Thoracoscopic drainage
title Thoracoscopic esophageal drainage for tracheal compression due to mucocele after esophagogastric bypass: a case report
title_full Thoracoscopic esophageal drainage for tracheal compression due to mucocele after esophagogastric bypass: a case report
title_fullStr Thoracoscopic esophageal drainage for tracheal compression due to mucocele after esophagogastric bypass: a case report
title_full_unstemmed Thoracoscopic esophageal drainage for tracheal compression due to mucocele after esophagogastric bypass: a case report
title_short Thoracoscopic esophageal drainage for tracheal compression due to mucocele after esophagogastric bypass: a case report
title_sort thoracoscopic esophageal drainage for tracheal compression due to mucocele after esophagogastric bypass a case report
topic Bypass surgery
Esophageal cancer
Thoracoscopic drainage
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s40792-023-01693-w
work_keys_str_mv AT takeshiyamashita thoracoscopicesophagealdrainagefortrachealcompressionduetomucoceleafteresophagogastricbypassacasereport
AT kojiotsuka thoracoscopicesophagealdrainagefortrachealcompressionduetomucoceleafteresophagogastricbypassacasereport
AT satorugoto thoracoscopicesophagealdrainagefortrachealcompressionduetomucoceleafteresophagogastricbypassacasereport
AT tomotakeariyoshi thoracoscopicesophagealdrainagefortrachealcompressionduetomucoceleafteresophagogastricbypassacasereport
AT kentaromotegi thoracoscopicesophagealdrainagefortrachealcompressionduetomucoceleafteresophagogastricbypassacasereport
AT masahirokohmoto thoracoscopicesophagealdrainagefortrachealcompressionduetomucoceleafteresophagogastricbypassacasereport
AT akirasaito thoracoscopicesophagealdrainagefortrachealcompressionduetomucoceleafteresophagogastricbypassacasereport
AT koichirofujimasa thoracoscopicesophagealdrainagefortrachealcompressionduetomucoceleafteresophagogastricbypassacasereport
AT yoshihitosato thoracoscopicesophagealdrainagefortrachealcompressionduetomucoceleafteresophagogastricbypassacasereport
AT reikato thoracoscopicesophagealdrainagefortrachealcompressionduetomucoceleafteresophagogastricbypassacasereport
AT tetsuosawatani thoracoscopicesophagealdrainagefortrachealcompressionduetomucoceleafteresophagogastricbypassacasereport
AT masahikomurakami thoracoscopicesophagealdrainagefortrachealcompressionduetomucoceleafteresophagogastricbypassacasereport