Solid Microneedles for Transdermal Delivery of Amantadine Hydrochloride and Pramipexole Dihydrochloride

The aim of this project was to study the influence of microneedles on transdermal delivery of amantadine hydrochloride and pramipexole dihydrochloride across porcine ear skin in vitro. Microchannel visualization studies were carried out and characterization of the microchannel depth was performed u...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mylien T. Hoang, Kevin B. Ita, Daniel A. Bair
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2015-09-01
Series:Pharmaceutics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/1999-4923/7/4/379
_version_ 1811184877291175936
author Mylien T. Hoang
Kevin B. Ita
Daniel A. Bair
author_facet Mylien T. Hoang
Kevin B. Ita
Daniel A. Bair
author_sort Mylien T. Hoang
collection DOAJ
description The aim of this project was to study the influence of microneedles on transdermal delivery of amantadine hydrochloride and pramipexole dihydrochloride across porcine ear skin in vitro. Microchannel visualization studies were carried out and characterization of the microchannel depth was performed using confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) to demonstrate microchannel formation following microneedle roller application. We also report, for the first time, the use of TA.XT Plus Texture Analyzer to characterize burst force in pig skin for transdermal drug delivery experiments. This is the force required to rupture pig skin. The mean passive flux of amantadine hydrochloride, determined using a developed LC–MS/MS technique, was 22.38 ± 4.73 µg/cm2/h, while the mean flux following the use of a stainless steel microneedle roller was 49.04 ± 19.77 µg/cm2/h. The mean passive flux of pramipexole dihydrochloride was 134.83 ± 13.66 µg/cm2/h, while the flux following the use of a stainless steel microneedle roller was 134.04 ± 0.98 µg/cm2/h. For both drugs, the difference in flux values following the use of solid stainless steel microneedle roller was not statistically significantly (p > 0.05). Statistical analysis was carried out using the Mann–Whitney Rank sum test.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T13:20:56Z
format Article
id doaj.art-04cff16820604990991bd9c3aa9a7ae0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1999-4923
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T13:20:56Z
publishDate 2015-09-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Pharmaceutics
spelling doaj.art-04cff16820604990991bd9c3aa9a7ae02022-12-22T04:22:12ZengMDPI AGPharmaceutics1999-49232015-09-017437939610.3390/pharmaceutics7040379pharmaceutics7040379Solid Microneedles for Transdermal Delivery of Amantadine Hydrochloride and Pramipexole DihydrochlorideMylien T. Hoang0Kevin B. Ita1Daniel A. Bair2College of Pharmacy, Touro University, Mare Island-Vallejo, CA 94592, USACollege of Pharmacy, Touro University, Mare Island-Vallejo, CA 94592, USADepartment of Land, Air, and Water Resources, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USAThe aim of this project was to study the influence of microneedles on transdermal delivery of amantadine hydrochloride and pramipexole dihydrochloride across porcine ear skin in vitro. Microchannel visualization studies were carried out and characterization of the microchannel depth was performed using confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) to demonstrate microchannel formation following microneedle roller application. We also report, for the first time, the use of TA.XT Plus Texture Analyzer to characterize burst force in pig skin for transdermal drug delivery experiments. This is the force required to rupture pig skin. The mean passive flux of amantadine hydrochloride, determined using a developed LC–MS/MS technique, was 22.38 ± 4.73 µg/cm2/h, while the mean flux following the use of a stainless steel microneedle roller was 49.04 ± 19.77 µg/cm2/h. The mean passive flux of pramipexole dihydrochloride was 134.83 ± 13.66 µg/cm2/h, while the flux following the use of a stainless steel microneedle roller was 134.04 ± 0.98 µg/cm2/h. For both drugs, the difference in flux values following the use of solid stainless steel microneedle roller was not statistically significantly (p > 0.05). Statistical analysis was carried out using the Mann–Whitney Rank sum test.http://www.mdpi.com/1999-4923/7/4/379transdermalsolid microneedlesmicroneedle rollerpercutaneous fluxburst force
spellingShingle Mylien T. Hoang
Kevin B. Ita
Daniel A. Bair
Solid Microneedles for Transdermal Delivery of Amantadine Hydrochloride and Pramipexole Dihydrochloride
Pharmaceutics
transdermal
solid microneedles
microneedle roller
percutaneous flux
burst force
title Solid Microneedles for Transdermal Delivery of Amantadine Hydrochloride and Pramipexole Dihydrochloride
title_full Solid Microneedles for Transdermal Delivery of Amantadine Hydrochloride and Pramipexole Dihydrochloride
title_fullStr Solid Microneedles for Transdermal Delivery of Amantadine Hydrochloride and Pramipexole Dihydrochloride
title_full_unstemmed Solid Microneedles for Transdermal Delivery of Amantadine Hydrochloride and Pramipexole Dihydrochloride
title_short Solid Microneedles for Transdermal Delivery of Amantadine Hydrochloride and Pramipexole Dihydrochloride
title_sort solid microneedles for transdermal delivery of amantadine hydrochloride and pramipexole dihydrochloride
topic transdermal
solid microneedles
microneedle roller
percutaneous flux
burst force
url http://www.mdpi.com/1999-4923/7/4/379
work_keys_str_mv AT mylienthoang solidmicroneedlesfortransdermaldeliveryofamantadinehydrochlorideandpramipexoledihydrochloride
AT kevinbita solidmicroneedlesfortransdermaldeliveryofamantadinehydrochlorideandpramipexoledihydrochloride
AT danielabair solidmicroneedlesfortransdermaldeliveryofamantadinehydrochlorideandpramipexoledihydrochloride