Comment on Naturalizing Critical Realist Social Ontology
This comment discusses Kaidesoja (2013) and raises the issue whether his analysis justifies stronger conclusions than he presents in the book. My comments focus on four issues. First, I argue that his naturalistic reconstruction of critical realist transcendental arguments shows that transcendental...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of Vienna
2015-07-01
|
Series: | Journal of Social Ontology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://journalofsocialontology.org/index.php/jso/article/view/6867 |
_version_ | 1797818182913753088 |
---|---|
author | Petri Ylikoski |
author_facet | Petri Ylikoski |
author_sort | Petri Ylikoski |
collection | DOAJ |
description |
This comment discusses Kaidesoja (2013) and raises the issue whether his analysis justifies stronger conclusions than he presents in the book. My comments focus on four issues. First, I argue that his naturalistic reconstruction of critical realist transcendental arguments shows that transcendental arguments should be treated as a rare curiosity rather than a general argumentative strategy. Second, I suggest that Kaidesoja’s analysis does not really justify his optimism about the usefulness of causal powers ontology in the social sciences. Third, I raise some doubts about the heuristic value of Mario Bunge’s social ontology that Kaidesoja presents as a replacement for critical realist ontology. Finally, I propose an alternative way to analyze failures of aggregativity that might better serve Kaidesoja’s purposes than the Wimsattian scheme he employs in the book.
|
first_indexed | 2024-03-13T09:04:20Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-04d704b927a54225833a30ff91cb1223 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2196-9663 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-13T09:04:20Z |
publishDate | 2015-07-01 |
publisher | University of Vienna |
record_format | Article |
series | Journal of Social Ontology |
spelling | doaj.art-04d704b927a54225833a30ff91cb12232023-05-28T07:32:29ZengUniversity of ViennaJournal of Social Ontology2196-96632015-07-0112Comment on Naturalizing Critical Realist Social OntologyPetri Ylikoski0University of Helsinki This comment discusses Kaidesoja (2013) and raises the issue whether his analysis justifies stronger conclusions than he presents in the book. My comments focus on four issues. First, I argue that his naturalistic reconstruction of critical realist transcendental arguments shows that transcendental arguments should be treated as a rare curiosity rather than a general argumentative strategy. Second, I suggest that Kaidesoja’s analysis does not really justify his optimism about the usefulness of causal powers ontology in the social sciences. Third, I raise some doubts about the heuristic value of Mario Bunge’s social ontology that Kaidesoja presents as a replacement for critical realist ontology. Finally, I propose an alternative way to analyze failures of aggregativity that might better serve Kaidesoja’s purposes than the Wimsattian scheme he employs in the book. https://journalofsocialontology.org/index.php/jso/article/view/6867critical realismtranscendental argumentscausal poweremergencesocial ontology |
spellingShingle | Petri Ylikoski Comment on Naturalizing Critical Realist Social Ontology Journal of Social Ontology critical realism transcendental arguments causal power emergence social ontology |
title | Comment on Naturalizing Critical Realist Social Ontology |
title_full | Comment on Naturalizing Critical Realist Social Ontology |
title_fullStr | Comment on Naturalizing Critical Realist Social Ontology |
title_full_unstemmed | Comment on Naturalizing Critical Realist Social Ontology |
title_short | Comment on Naturalizing Critical Realist Social Ontology |
title_sort | comment on naturalizing critical realist social ontology |
topic | critical realism transcendental arguments causal power emergence social ontology |
url | https://journalofsocialontology.org/index.php/jso/article/view/6867 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT petriylikoski commentonnaturalizingcriticalrealistsocialontology |