Use of biologically active substances in hops
In four-year experiments, hop was treated with 7 biologically active substances in two terms during vegetation: Lignohumate max (a mixture of humic acids and fulvic acids), Lexin (a mixture of humic acids and fulvic acids enriched with auxins), Lexenzym (a mixture of humic acids and fulvic acids enr...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences
2018-12-01
|
Series: | Plant, Soil and Environment |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://pse.agriculturejournals.cz/artkey/pse-201812-0010_use-of-biologically-active-substances-in-hops.php |
_version_ | 1797898112832897024 |
---|---|
author | Pavel PROCHÁZKA Přemysl ŠTRANC Kateřina PAZDERŮ Jan VOSTŘEL Jan ŘEHOŘ |
author_facet | Pavel PROCHÁZKA Přemysl ŠTRANC Kateřina PAZDERŮ Jan VOSTŘEL Jan ŘEHOŘ |
author_sort | Pavel PROCHÁZKA |
collection | DOAJ |
description | In four-year experiments, hop was treated with 7 biologically active substances in two terms during vegetation: Lignohumate max (a mixture of humic acids and fulvic acids), Lexin (a mixture of humic acids and fulvic acids enriched with auxins), Lexenzym (a mixture of humic acids and fulvic acids enriched with auxins, phytohormones and enzymes precursors), Ascophyllum nodosum seaweed extract, synthetic auxin, humic acids and fulvic acids alone. The chlorophyll content was monitored after the application both in the vine leaves and in the branch leaves. After harvesting of the hops from the individual treatments, the yield of dry hops was determined and the cones were analysed for the content of alpha bitter acids. The results show that the most effective hop treatment was the application of Lexin and Lexenzym. The Lexenzym treatment provided a yield of dry hops of 1.86 t/ha, i.e. 0.47 t/ha higher compared with untreated control. The Lexin treatment provided yield higher by 0.41 t/ha of dry hops compared with the untreated control, while the harvested cones contained the most alpha-bitter acids (4.57%). |
first_indexed | 2024-04-10T08:08:06Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-04d9848ba23e47b582a4132260cd6374 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1214-1178 1805-9368 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-10T08:08:06Z |
publishDate | 2018-12-01 |
publisher | Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences |
record_format | Article |
series | Plant, Soil and Environment |
spelling | doaj.art-04d9848ba23e47b582a4132260cd63742023-02-23T03:46:39ZengCzech Academy of Agricultural SciencesPlant, Soil and Environment1214-11781805-93682018-12-01641262663210.17221/655/2018-PSEpse-201812-0010Use of biologically active substances in hopsPavel PROCHÁZKA0Přemysl ŠTRANC1Kateřina PAZDERŮ2Jan VOSTŘEL3Jan ŘEHOŘ4Department of Crop Production, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food, and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech RepublicZEPOR + - Agriculture Consultancy and Forensic Expertise Services, Žatec, Czech RepublicDepartment of Crop Production, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food, and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech RepublicDepartment of Crop Production, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food, and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech RepublicDepartment of Crop Production, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food, and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech RepublicIn four-year experiments, hop was treated with 7 biologically active substances in two terms during vegetation: Lignohumate max (a mixture of humic acids and fulvic acids), Lexin (a mixture of humic acids and fulvic acids enriched with auxins), Lexenzym (a mixture of humic acids and fulvic acids enriched with auxins, phytohormones and enzymes precursors), Ascophyllum nodosum seaweed extract, synthetic auxin, humic acids and fulvic acids alone. The chlorophyll content was monitored after the application both in the vine leaves and in the branch leaves. After harvesting of the hops from the individual treatments, the yield of dry hops was determined and the cones were analysed for the content of alpha bitter acids. The results show that the most effective hop treatment was the application of Lexin and Lexenzym. The Lexenzym treatment provided a yield of dry hops of 1.86 t/ha, i.e. 0.47 t/ha higher compared with untreated control. The Lexin treatment provided yield higher by 0.41 t/ha of dry hops compared with the untreated control, while the harvested cones contained the most alpha-bitter acids (4.57%).https://pse.agriculturejournals.cz/artkey/pse-201812-0010_use-of-biologically-active-substances-in-hops.phphumulus lupulus l.hops productionhumic substancegreen pigmentsquality |
spellingShingle | Pavel PROCHÁZKA Přemysl ŠTRANC Kateřina PAZDERŮ Jan VOSTŘEL Jan ŘEHOŘ Use of biologically active substances in hops Plant, Soil and Environment humulus lupulus l. hops production humic substance green pigments quality |
title | Use of biologically active substances in hops |
title_full | Use of biologically active substances in hops |
title_fullStr | Use of biologically active substances in hops |
title_full_unstemmed | Use of biologically active substances in hops |
title_short | Use of biologically active substances in hops |
title_sort | use of biologically active substances in hops |
topic | humulus lupulus l. hops production humic substance green pigments quality |
url | https://pse.agriculturejournals.cz/artkey/pse-201812-0010_use-of-biologically-active-substances-in-hops.php |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pavelprochazka useofbiologicallyactivesubstancesinhops AT premyslstranc useofbiologicallyactivesubstancesinhops AT katerinapazderu useofbiologicallyactivesubstancesinhops AT janvostrel useofbiologicallyactivesubstancesinhops AT janrehor useofbiologicallyactivesubstancesinhops |