Comparison of PM<sub>10</sub> Sources Profiles at 15 French Sites Using a Harmonized Constrained Positive Matrix Factorization Approach

Receptor-oriented models, including positive matrix factorization (PMF) analyses, are now commonly used to elaborate and/or evaluate action plans to improve air quality. In this context, the SOURCES project has been set-up to gather and investigate in a harmonized way 15 datasets of chemical compoun...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Samuël Weber, Dalia Salameh, Alexandre Albinet, Laurent Y. Alleman, Antoine Waked, Jean-Luc Besombes, Véronique Jacob, Géraldine Guillaud, Boualem Meshbah, Benoit Rocq, Agnès Hulin, Marta Dominik-Sègue, Eve Chrétien, Jean-Luc Jaffrezo, Olivier Favez
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-06-01
Series:Atmosphere
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/10/6/310
_version_ 1828528318604902400
author Samuël Weber
Dalia Salameh
Alexandre Albinet
Laurent Y. Alleman
Antoine Waked
Jean-Luc Besombes
Véronique Jacob
Géraldine Guillaud
Boualem Meshbah
Benoit Rocq
Agnès Hulin
Marta Dominik-Sègue
Eve Chrétien
Jean-Luc Jaffrezo
Olivier Favez
author_facet Samuël Weber
Dalia Salameh
Alexandre Albinet
Laurent Y. Alleman
Antoine Waked
Jean-Luc Besombes
Véronique Jacob
Géraldine Guillaud
Boualem Meshbah
Benoit Rocq
Agnès Hulin
Marta Dominik-Sègue
Eve Chrétien
Jean-Luc Jaffrezo
Olivier Favez
author_sort Samuël Weber
collection DOAJ
description Receptor-oriented models, including positive matrix factorization (PMF) analyses, are now commonly used to elaborate and/or evaluate action plans to improve air quality. In this context, the SOURCES project has been set-up to gather and investigate in a harmonized way 15 datasets of chemical compounds from PM<sub>10</sub> collected for PMF studies during a five-year period (2012&#8722;2016) in France. The present paper aims at giving an overview of the results obtained within this project, notably illustrating the behavior of key primary sources as well as focusing on their statistical robustness and representativeness. Overall, wood burning for residential heating as well as road transport were confirmed to be the two main primary sources strongly influencing PM<sub>10</sub> loadings across the country. While wood burning profiles, as well as those dominated by secondary inorganic aerosols, present a rather good homogeneity among the sites investigated, some significant variabilities were observed for primary traffic factors, illustrating the need to better characterize the diversity of the various vehicle exhaust and non-exhaust emissions. Finally, natural sources, such as sea salts (widely observed in internal mixing with anthropogenic compounds), primary biogenic aerosols and/or terrigenous particles, were also found as non-negligible PM<sub>10</sub> components at every investigated site.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T21:50:46Z
format Article
id doaj.art-04e3faf9ef7347aebf89132e5d50922a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2073-4433
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T21:50:46Z
publishDate 2019-06-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Atmosphere
spelling doaj.art-04e3faf9ef7347aebf89132e5d50922a2022-12-22T00:49:28ZengMDPI AGAtmosphere2073-44332019-06-0110631010.3390/atmos10060310atmos10060310Comparison of PM<sub>10</sub> Sources Profiles at 15 French Sites Using a Harmonized Constrained Positive Matrix Factorization ApproachSamuël Weber0Dalia Salameh1Alexandre Albinet2Laurent Y. Alleman3Antoine Waked4Jean-Luc Besombes5Véronique Jacob6Géraldine Guillaud7Boualem Meshbah8Benoit Rocq9Agnès Hulin10Marta Dominik-Sègue11Eve Chrétien12Jean-Luc Jaffrezo13Olivier Favez14Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, IRD, INP-G, IGE (UMR 5001), 38000 Grenoble, FranceUniv. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, IRD, INP-G, IGE (UMR 5001), 38000 Grenoble, FranceINERIS, Parc Technologique Alata, BP 2, 60550 Verneuil-en-Halatte, FranceIMT Lille Douai, Univ. Lille, UR SAGE, 59500 Douai, FranceUniv. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, IRD, INP-G, IGE (UMR 5001), 38000 Grenoble, FranceUniv. Savoie Mont-Blanc, LCME, 73000 Chambéry, FranceUniv. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, IRD, INP-G, IGE (UMR 5001), 38000 Grenoble, FranceAtmo AuRA, 69500 Bron, FranceAtmo Sud, 13294 Marseille, FranceAtmo Hauts de France, 59044 Lille, FranceAtmo Nouvelle Aquitaine, 33692 Merignac, FranceAtmo Normandie, 76000 Rouen, FranceAtmo Grand Est, 57070 Metz, FranceUniv. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, IRD, INP-G, IGE (UMR 5001), 38000 Grenoble, FranceINERIS, Parc Technologique Alata, BP 2, 60550 Verneuil-en-Halatte, FranceReceptor-oriented models, including positive matrix factorization (PMF) analyses, are now commonly used to elaborate and/or evaluate action plans to improve air quality. In this context, the SOURCES project has been set-up to gather and investigate in a harmonized way 15 datasets of chemical compounds from PM<sub>10</sub> collected for PMF studies during a five-year period (2012&#8722;2016) in France. The present paper aims at giving an overview of the results obtained within this project, notably illustrating the behavior of key primary sources as well as focusing on their statistical robustness and representativeness. Overall, wood burning for residential heating as well as road transport were confirmed to be the two main primary sources strongly influencing PM<sub>10</sub> loadings across the country. While wood burning profiles, as well as those dominated by secondary inorganic aerosols, present a rather good homogeneity among the sites investigated, some significant variabilities were observed for primary traffic factors, illustrating the need to better characterize the diversity of the various vehicle exhaust and non-exhaust emissions. Finally, natural sources, such as sea salts (widely observed in internal mixing with anthropogenic compounds), primary biogenic aerosols and/or terrigenous particles, were also found as non-negligible PM<sub>10</sub> components at every investigated site.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/10/6/310PMsource apportionmentaerosolssimilarity assessmentuncertainties
spellingShingle Samuël Weber
Dalia Salameh
Alexandre Albinet
Laurent Y. Alleman
Antoine Waked
Jean-Luc Besombes
Véronique Jacob
Géraldine Guillaud
Boualem Meshbah
Benoit Rocq
Agnès Hulin
Marta Dominik-Sègue
Eve Chrétien
Jean-Luc Jaffrezo
Olivier Favez
Comparison of PM<sub>10</sub> Sources Profiles at 15 French Sites Using a Harmonized Constrained Positive Matrix Factorization Approach
Atmosphere
PM
source apportionment
aerosols
similarity assessment
uncertainties
title Comparison of PM<sub>10</sub> Sources Profiles at 15 French Sites Using a Harmonized Constrained Positive Matrix Factorization Approach
title_full Comparison of PM<sub>10</sub> Sources Profiles at 15 French Sites Using a Harmonized Constrained Positive Matrix Factorization Approach
title_fullStr Comparison of PM<sub>10</sub> Sources Profiles at 15 French Sites Using a Harmonized Constrained Positive Matrix Factorization Approach
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of PM<sub>10</sub> Sources Profiles at 15 French Sites Using a Harmonized Constrained Positive Matrix Factorization Approach
title_short Comparison of PM<sub>10</sub> Sources Profiles at 15 French Sites Using a Harmonized Constrained Positive Matrix Factorization Approach
title_sort comparison of pm sub 10 sub sources profiles at 15 french sites using a harmonized constrained positive matrix factorization approach
topic PM
source apportionment
aerosols
similarity assessment
uncertainties
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/10/6/310
work_keys_str_mv AT samuelweber comparisonofpmsub10subsourcesprofilesat15frenchsitesusingaharmonizedconstrainedpositivematrixfactorizationapproach
AT daliasalameh comparisonofpmsub10subsourcesprofilesat15frenchsitesusingaharmonizedconstrainedpositivematrixfactorizationapproach
AT alexandrealbinet comparisonofpmsub10subsourcesprofilesat15frenchsitesusingaharmonizedconstrainedpositivematrixfactorizationapproach
AT laurentyalleman comparisonofpmsub10subsourcesprofilesat15frenchsitesusingaharmonizedconstrainedpositivematrixfactorizationapproach
AT antoinewaked comparisonofpmsub10subsourcesprofilesat15frenchsitesusingaharmonizedconstrainedpositivematrixfactorizationapproach
AT jeanlucbesombes comparisonofpmsub10subsourcesprofilesat15frenchsitesusingaharmonizedconstrainedpositivematrixfactorizationapproach
AT veroniquejacob comparisonofpmsub10subsourcesprofilesat15frenchsitesusingaharmonizedconstrainedpositivematrixfactorizationapproach
AT geraldineguillaud comparisonofpmsub10subsourcesprofilesat15frenchsitesusingaharmonizedconstrainedpositivematrixfactorizationapproach
AT boualemmeshbah comparisonofpmsub10subsourcesprofilesat15frenchsitesusingaharmonizedconstrainedpositivematrixfactorizationapproach
AT benoitrocq comparisonofpmsub10subsourcesprofilesat15frenchsitesusingaharmonizedconstrainedpositivematrixfactorizationapproach
AT agneshulin comparisonofpmsub10subsourcesprofilesat15frenchsitesusingaharmonizedconstrainedpositivematrixfactorizationapproach
AT martadominiksegue comparisonofpmsub10subsourcesprofilesat15frenchsitesusingaharmonizedconstrainedpositivematrixfactorizationapproach
AT evechretien comparisonofpmsub10subsourcesprofilesat15frenchsitesusingaharmonizedconstrainedpositivematrixfactorizationapproach
AT jeanlucjaffrezo comparisonofpmsub10subsourcesprofilesat15frenchsitesusingaharmonizedconstrainedpositivematrixfactorizationapproach
AT olivierfavez comparisonofpmsub10subsourcesprofilesat15frenchsitesusingaharmonizedconstrainedpositivematrixfactorizationapproach