The Quest to Solve Problems That Don’t Exist: Thought Artifacts in Contemporary Ontology

Questions about the nature of reality and consciousness remain unresolved in philosophy today, but not for lack of hypotheses. Ontologies as varied as physicalism, microexperientialism and cosmopsychism enrich the philosophical menu. Each of these ontologies faces a seemingly fundamental problem: un...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kastrup Bernardo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sciendo 2017-10-01
Series:Studia Humana
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1515/sh-2017-0026
_version_ 1818586507001200640
author Kastrup Bernardo
author_facet Kastrup Bernardo
author_sort Kastrup Bernardo
collection DOAJ
description Questions about the nature of reality and consciousness remain unresolved in philosophy today, but not for lack of hypotheses. Ontologies as varied as physicalism, microexperientialism and cosmopsychism enrich the philosophical menu. Each of these ontologies faces a seemingly fundamental problem: under physicalism, for instance, we have the ‘hard problem of consciousness,’ whereas under microexperientialism we have the ‘subject combination problem.’ I argue that these problems are thought artifacts, having no grounding in empirical reality. In a manner akin to semantic paradoxes, they exist only in the internal logico-conceptual structure of their respective ontologies.
first_indexed 2024-12-16T08:54:03Z
format Article
id doaj.art-04fe43519bba4551b77c72a8e015a7d4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2299-0518
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-16T08:54:03Z
publishDate 2017-10-01
publisher Sciendo
record_format Article
series Studia Humana
spelling doaj.art-04fe43519bba4551b77c72a8e015a7d42022-12-21T22:37:20ZengSciendoStudia Humana2299-05182017-10-0164455110.1515/sh-2017-0026sh-2017-0026The Quest to Solve Problems That Don’t Exist: Thought Artifacts in Contemporary OntologyKastrup Bernardo0Veldhoven, The NetherlandsQuestions about the nature of reality and consciousness remain unresolved in philosophy today, but not for lack of hypotheses. Ontologies as varied as physicalism, microexperientialism and cosmopsychism enrich the philosophical menu. Each of these ontologies faces a seemingly fundamental problem: under physicalism, for instance, we have the ‘hard problem of consciousness,’ whereas under microexperientialism we have the ‘subject combination problem.’ I argue that these problems are thought artifacts, having no grounding in empirical reality. In a manner akin to semantic paradoxes, they exist only in the internal logico-conceptual structure of their respective ontologies.https://doi.org/10.1515/sh-2017-0026physicalismpanpsychismcosmopsychismidealismhard problem of consciousnesssubject combination problem
spellingShingle Kastrup Bernardo
The Quest to Solve Problems That Don’t Exist: Thought Artifacts in Contemporary Ontology
Studia Humana
physicalism
panpsychism
cosmopsychism
idealism
hard problem of consciousness
subject combination problem
title The Quest to Solve Problems That Don’t Exist: Thought Artifacts in Contemporary Ontology
title_full The Quest to Solve Problems That Don’t Exist: Thought Artifacts in Contemporary Ontology
title_fullStr The Quest to Solve Problems That Don’t Exist: Thought Artifacts in Contemporary Ontology
title_full_unstemmed The Quest to Solve Problems That Don’t Exist: Thought Artifacts in Contemporary Ontology
title_short The Quest to Solve Problems That Don’t Exist: Thought Artifacts in Contemporary Ontology
title_sort quest to solve problems that don t exist thought artifacts in contemporary ontology
topic physicalism
panpsychism
cosmopsychism
idealism
hard problem of consciousness
subject combination problem
url https://doi.org/10.1515/sh-2017-0026
work_keys_str_mv AT kastrupbernardo thequesttosolveproblemsthatdontexistthoughtartifactsincontemporaryontology
AT kastrupbernardo questtosolveproblemsthatdontexistthoughtartifactsincontemporaryontology