Elevated Thresholds for Light Touch in Children With Autism Reflect More Conservative Perceptual Decision-Making Rather Than a Sensory Deficit

Individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) are often behaviorally hyper-reactive to light touch, but it is unclear to what degree this arises from a fundamental sensory difference vs. higher order systems for attention or emotion processing. Thus far, experimental findings for light touch detec...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jennifer M. Quinde-Zlibut, Christian D. Okitondo, Zachary J. Williams, Amy Weitlauf, Lisa E. Mash, Brynna H. Heflin, Neil D. Woodward, Carissa J. Cascio
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-04-01
Series:Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnhum.2020.00122/full
_version_ 1818329116421652480
author Jennifer M. Quinde-Zlibut
Christian D. Okitondo
Zachary J. Williams
Zachary J. Williams
Zachary J. Williams
Amy Weitlauf
Lisa E. Mash
Brynna H. Heflin
Neil D. Woodward
Carissa J. Cascio
Carissa J. Cascio
Carissa J. Cascio
author_facet Jennifer M. Quinde-Zlibut
Christian D. Okitondo
Zachary J. Williams
Zachary J. Williams
Zachary J. Williams
Amy Weitlauf
Lisa E. Mash
Brynna H. Heflin
Neil D. Woodward
Carissa J. Cascio
Carissa J. Cascio
Carissa J. Cascio
author_sort Jennifer M. Quinde-Zlibut
collection DOAJ
description Individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) are often behaviorally hyper-reactive to light touch, but it is unclear to what degree this arises from a fundamental sensory difference vs. higher order systems for attention or emotion processing. Thus far, experimental findings for light touch detection are mixed, and few previous studies have independently considered sensitivity (the ability to discriminate signal from noise) and decision criterion (the overall response bias or tendency to answer “yes” or “no” in a detection task). We tested a large sample of children, adolescents, and adults with ASD (n = 88) and with neurotypical (NT) development (n = 59) using von Frey filaments to derive light touch thresholds at the palm. We calculated signal detection metrics for sensitivity (Az) and response criterion (c) from hit and false alarm rates. Both metrics exhibited significant group differences, such that the ASD group was less sensitive, but had a much more conservative response criterion. We used a best subset model selection procedure in three separate ordinal regressions for the whole group, adults, and children/adolescents. In all selected models, c was by far the most significant predictor of threshold, supplanting effects of diagnostic group that were significant in the baseline models. In contrast, Az was not a significant predictor of threshold in any of the models. Mean values of c were similar for adults with and without autism and for children/adolescents with ASD, but lower (more liberal) in neurotypical children/adolescents. This suggests that children with ASD exhibit a conservatism in their perceptual decision-making that differs from their NT peers but resembles that of adults. Across the sample, the value of c was significantly and positively correlated with age and with autism symptoms (SRS-2 total score), in addition to thresholds. The results of this study suggest that, rather than a sensory difference in detection of light touch, there is a difference in response bias such that children with ASD are more conservative/likely to report “no” if unsure, than their young NT peers. Future work should consider the implications of conservative response criterion in ASD for commonly used forced-choice psychophysical paradigms.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T12:42:57Z
format Article
id doaj.art-050215f986854781be8d784654debce9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1662-5161
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T12:42:57Z
publishDate 2020-04-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
spelling doaj.art-050215f986854781be8d784654debce92022-12-21T23:45:35ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Human Neuroscience1662-51612020-04-011410.3389/fnhum.2020.00122524394Elevated Thresholds for Light Touch in Children With Autism Reflect More Conservative Perceptual Decision-Making Rather Than a Sensory DeficitJennifer M. Quinde-Zlibut0Christian D. Okitondo1Zachary J. Williams2Zachary J. Williams3Zachary J. Williams4Amy Weitlauf5Lisa E. Mash6Brynna H. Heflin7Neil D. Woodward8Carissa J. Cascio9Carissa J. Cascio10Carissa J. Cascio11Graduate Program in Neuroscience, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United StatesGraduate Program in Biostatistics, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, United StatesGraduate Program in Neuroscience, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United StatesMedical Scientist Training Program, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, United StatesFrist Center for Autism and Innovation, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United StatesDepartment of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United StatesSan Diego Joint Doctoral Program in Clinical Psychology, San Diego State University/University of California, San Diego, CA, United StatesGraduate Program in Clinical Psychology, Florida International University, Miami, FL, United StatesDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United StatesFrist Center for Autism and Innovation, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United StatesDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United StatesVanderbilt Kennedy Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United StatesIndividuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) are often behaviorally hyper-reactive to light touch, but it is unclear to what degree this arises from a fundamental sensory difference vs. higher order systems for attention or emotion processing. Thus far, experimental findings for light touch detection are mixed, and few previous studies have independently considered sensitivity (the ability to discriminate signal from noise) and decision criterion (the overall response bias or tendency to answer “yes” or “no” in a detection task). We tested a large sample of children, adolescents, and adults with ASD (n = 88) and with neurotypical (NT) development (n = 59) using von Frey filaments to derive light touch thresholds at the palm. We calculated signal detection metrics for sensitivity (Az) and response criterion (c) from hit and false alarm rates. Both metrics exhibited significant group differences, such that the ASD group was less sensitive, but had a much more conservative response criterion. We used a best subset model selection procedure in three separate ordinal regressions for the whole group, adults, and children/adolescents. In all selected models, c was by far the most significant predictor of threshold, supplanting effects of diagnostic group that were significant in the baseline models. In contrast, Az was not a significant predictor of threshold in any of the models. Mean values of c were similar for adults with and without autism and for children/adolescents with ASD, but lower (more liberal) in neurotypical children/adolescents. This suggests that children with ASD exhibit a conservatism in their perceptual decision-making that differs from their NT peers but resembles that of adults. Across the sample, the value of c was significantly and positively correlated with age and with autism symptoms (SRS-2 total score), in addition to thresholds. The results of this study suggest that, rather than a sensory difference in detection of light touch, there is a difference in response bias such that children with ASD are more conservative/likely to report “no” if unsure, than their young NT peers. Future work should consider the implications of conservative response criterion in ASD for commonly used forced-choice psychophysical paradigms.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnhum.2020.00122/fullautismtactilepsychophysicsresponse biassignal detection
spellingShingle Jennifer M. Quinde-Zlibut
Christian D. Okitondo
Zachary J. Williams
Zachary J. Williams
Zachary J. Williams
Amy Weitlauf
Lisa E. Mash
Brynna H. Heflin
Neil D. Woodward
Carissa J. Cascio
Carissa J. Cascio
Carissa J. Cascio
Elevated Thresholds for Light Touch in Children With Autism Reflect More Conservative Perceptual Decision-Making Rather Than a Sensory Deficit
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
autism
tactile
psychophysics
response bias
signal detection
title Elevated Thresholds for Light Touch in Children With Autism Reflect More Conservative Perceptual Decision-Making Rather Than a Sensory Deficit
title_full Elevated Thresholds for Light Touch in Children With Autism Reflect More Conservative Perceptual Decision-Making Rather Than a Sensory Deficit
title_fullStr Elevated Thresholds for Light Touch in Children With Autism Reflect More Conservative Perceptual Decision-Making Rather Than a Sensory Deficit
title_full_unstemmed Elevated Thresholds for Light Touch in Children With Autism Reflect More Conservative Perceptual Decision-Making Rather Than a Sensory Deficit
title_short Elevated Thresholds for Light Touch in Children With Autism Reflect More Conservative Perceptual Decision-Making Rather Than a Sensory Deficit
title_sort elevated thresholds for light touch in children with autism reflect more conservative perceptual decision making rather than a sensory deficit
topic autism
tactile
psychophysics
response bias
signal detection
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnhum.2020.00122/full
work_keys_str_mv AT jennifermquindezlibut elevatedthresholdsforlighttouchinchildrenwithautismreflectmoreconservativeperceptualdecisionmakingratherthanasensorydeficit
AT christiandokitondo elevatedthresholdsforlighttouchinchildrenwithautismreflectmoreconservativeperceptualdecisionmakingratherthanasensorydeficit
AT zacharyjwilliams elevatedthresholdsforlighttouchinchildrenwithautismreflectmoreconservativeperceptualdecisionmakingratherthanasensorydeficit
AT zacharyjwilliams elevatedthresholdsforlighttouchinchildrenwithautismreflectmoreconservativeperceptualdecisionmakingratherthanasensorydeficit
AT zacharyjwilliams elevatedthresholdsforlighttouchinchildrenwithautismreflectmoreconservativeperceptualdecisionmakingratherthanasensorydeficit
AT amyweitlauf elevatedthresholdsforlighttouchinchildrenwithautismreflectmoreconservativeperceptualdecisionmakingratherthanasensorydeficit
AT lisaemash elevatedthresholdsforlighttouchinchildrenwithautismreflectmoreconservativeperceptualdecisionmakingratherthanasensorydeficit
AT brynnahheflin elevatedthresholdsforlighttouchinchildrenwithautismreflectmoreconservativeperceptualdecisionmakingratherthanasensorydeficit
AT neildwoodward elevatedthresholdsforlighttouchinchildrenwithautismreflectmoreconservativeperceptualdecisionmakingratherthanasensorydeficit
AT carissajcascio elevatedthresholdsforlighttouchinchildrenwithautismreflectmoreconservativeperceptualdecisionmakingratherthanasensorydeficit
AT carissajcascio elevatedthresholdsforlighttouchinchildrenwithautismreflectmoreconservativeperceptualdecisionmakingratherthanasensorydeficit
AT carissajcascio elevatedthresholdsforlighttouchinchildrenwithautismreflectmoreconservativeperceptualdecisionmakingratherthanasensorydeficit