Morphometrics and evolution: the challenge of crossing rugged phenotypic landscapes with straight paths

Geometric morphometrics is widely used to study underlying causal factors in phenotypic evolution and to reconstruct evolutionary history of phenotypes. However, non-linearities in the phenotypic landscape may exist such that analytical solutions derived from comparison of phenotypes in morphospace...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: P. D. Polly
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Federal Research Center Institute of Cytology and Genetics, The Vavilov Society of Geneticists and Breeders 2017-07-01
Series:Вавиловский журнал генетики и селекции
Subjects:
Online Access:https://vavilov.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/1027
_version_ 1797214052524490752
author P. D. Polly
author_facet P. D. Polly
author_sort P. D. Polly
collection DOAJ
description Geometric morphometrics is widely used to study underlying causal factors in phenotypic evolution and to reconstruct evolutionary history of phenotypes. However, non-linearities in the phenotypic landscape may exist such that analytical solutions derived from comparison of phenotypes in morphospace may have complex or contradictory relationships in the space of the underlying factors. Ancestral reconstruction of horn morphology based on two mammalian ungulates illustrates how biologically improbable results can arise from the mathematical properties of geometric morphometric morphospaces. Raup’s shell coiling equations are used to illustrate the potential for contradictory conclusions to be drawn from ancestral reconstructions in parameter spaces (such as measurements of levels of gene expression or allele frequencies) versus shape spaces (such as morphospaces based on phenotypic analysis). These examples are generalizable to many real morphometric studies, suggesting that care should be taken when drawing conclusions about genetic, developmental, or environmental processes based on morphometric analyses. Dense sampling of shape space and the use of fully multivariate and, perhaps, nonlinear methods can help forestall potential problems.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T16:06:45Z
format Article
id doaj.art-050a9a9511b8464cb54af20f59b2434b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2500-3259
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T11:08:02Z
publishDate 2017-07-01
publisher Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Federal Research Center Institute of Cytology and Genetics, The Vavilov Society of Geneticists and Breeders
record_format Article
series Вавиловский журнал генетики и селекции
spelling doaj.art-050a9a9511b8464cb54af20f59b2434b2024-04-11T15:30:58ZengSiberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Federal Research Center Institute of Cytology and Genetics, The Vavilov Society of Geneticists and BreedersВавиловский журнал генетики и селекции2500-32592017-07-0121445246110.18699/VJ17.264630Morphometrics and evolution: the challenge of crossing rugged phenotypic landscapes with straight pathsP. D. Polly0Indiana UniversityGeometric morphometrics is widely used to study underlying causal factors in phenotypic evolution and to reconstruct evolutionary history of phenotypes. However, non-linearities in the phenotypic landscape may exist such that analytical solutions derived from comparison of phenotypes in morphospace may have complex or contradictory relationships in the space of the underlying factors. Ancestral reconstruction of horn morphology based on two mammalian ungulates illustrates how biologically improbable results can arise from the mathematical properties of geometric morphometric morphospaces. Raup’s shell coiling equations are used to illustrate the potential for contradictory conclusions to be drawn from ancestral reconstructions in parameter spaces (such as measurements of levels of gene expression or allele frequencies) versus shape spaces (such as morphospaces based on phenotypic analysis). These examples are generalizable to many real morphometric studies, suggesting that care should be taken when drawing conclusions about genetic, developmental, or environmental processes based on morphometric analyses. Dense sampling of shape space and the use of fully multivariate and, perhaps, nonlinear methods can help forestall potential problems.https://vavilov.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/1027geometric morphometricsmollusc shellsphenotypic evolutionphylogenetic comparative methodssemilandmarks
spellingShingle P. D. Polly
Morphometrics and evolution: the challenge of crossing rugged phenotypic landscapes with straight paths
Вавиловский журнал генетики и селекции
geometric morphometrics
mollusc shells
phenotypic evolution
phylogenetic comparative methods
semilandmarks
title Morphometrics and evolution: the challenge of crossing rugged phenotypic landscapes with straight paths
title_full Morphometrics and evolution: the challenge of crossing rugged phenotypic landscapes with straight paths
title_fullStr Morphometrics and evolution: the challenge of crossing rugged phenotypic landscapes with straight paths
title_full_unstemmed Morphometrics and evolution: the challenge of crossing rugged phenotypic landscapes with straight paths
title_short Morphometrics and evolution: the challenge of crossing rugged phenotypic landscapes with straight paths
title_sort morphometrics and evolution the challenge of crossing rugged phenotypic landscapes with straight paths
topic geometric morphometrics
mollusc shells
phenotypic evolution
phylogenetic comparative methods
semilandmarks
url https://vavilov.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/1027
work_keys_str_mv AT pdpolly morphometricsandevolutionthechallengeofcrossingruggedphenotypiclandscapeswithstraightpaths