Theoretical explanations and practices regarding the distinction between the concepts: judicial error, error of law and fundamental vice in the legislation of the Republic of Moldova
In the research, a doctrinal and legal analysis of the concept of legal error is carried out. The author provides a self-defined definition of the concept addressed and highlights the main causes and conditions for the occurrence of judicial errors. At present, in the specialized legal doctrine of t...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Bucharest University of Economic Studies
2017-10-01
|
| Series: | Juridical Tribune |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://tribunajuridica.eu/arhiva/An7v11/5.%20Muntean.pdf |
| _version_ | 1797219024199745536 |
|---|---|
| author | Vasilisa Muntean |
| author_facet | Vasilisa Muntean |
| author_sort | Vasilisa Muntean |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | In the research, a doctrinal and legal analysis of the concept of legal error is carried out. The author provides a self-defined definition of the concept addressed and highlights the main causes and conditions for the occurrence of judicial errors. At present, in the specialized legal doctrine of the Republic of Moldova, the problem of defining the judicial error has been little approached. In this respect, this scientific article is a scientific
approach aimed at elucidating the theoretical and normative deficiencies and errors that occur in the area of reparation of the prejudice caused by judicial errors. In order to achieve our goal, we aim to create a core of ideas and referral mechanisms that ensure a certain interpretative and decisional homogeneity in the doctrinal and legal characterization of the phrase "judicial error". |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-24T12:27:04Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-050dc0f0f64d450894f5ab19855beaf4 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2247-7195 2248-0382 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-24T12:27:04Z |
| publishDate | 2017-10-01 |
| publisher | Bucharest University of Economic Studies |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Juridical Tribune |
| spelling | doaj.art-050dc0f0f64d450894f5ab19855beaf42024-04-08T07:43:03ZengBucharest University of Economic StudiesJuridical Tribune2247-71952248-03822017-10-017Special6979Theoretical explanations and practices regarding the distinction between the concepts: judicial error, error of law and fundamental vice in the legislation of the Republic of MoldovaVasilisa Muntean0 University of European Political and Economic Studies "Constantin Stere", Republic of MoldovaIn the research, a doctrinal and legal analysis of the concept of legal error is carried out. The author provides a self-defined definition of the concept addressed and highlights the main causes and conditions for the occurrence of judicial errors. At present, in the specialized legal doctrine of the Republic of Moldova, the problem of defining the judicial error has been little approached. In this respect, this scientific article is a scientific approach aimed at elucidating the theoretical and normative deficiencies and errors that occur in the area of reparation of the prejudice caused by judicial errors. In order to achieve our goal, we aim to create a core of ideas and referral mechanisms that ensure a certain interpretative and decisional homogeneity in the doctrinal and legal characterization of the phrase "judicial error".http://tribunajuridica.eu/arhiva/An7v11/5.%20Muntean.pdfjudicial errorcourtjudgecriminal trialjudgmentjurisdictioncriminal investigation. |
| spellingShingle | Vasilisa Muntean Theoretical explanations and practices regarding the distinction between the concepts: judicial error, error of law and fundamental vice in the legislation of the Republic of Moldova Juridical Tribune judicial error court judge criminal trial judgment jurisdiction criminal investigation. |
| title | Theoretical explanations and practices regarding the distinction between the concepts: judicial error, error of law and fundamental vice in the legislation of the Republic of Moldova |
| title_full | Theoretical explanations and practices regarding the distinction between the concepts: judicial error, error of law and fundamental vice in the legislation of the Republic of Moldova |
| title_fullStr | Theoretical explanations and practices regarding the distinction between the concepts: judicial error, error of law and fundamental vice in the legislation of the Republic of Moldova |
| title_full_unstemmed | Theoretical explanations and practices regarding the distinction between the concepts: judicial error, error of law and fundamental vice in the legislation of the Republic of Moldova |
| title_short | Theoretical explanations and practices regarding the distinction between the concepts: judicial error, error of law and fundamental vice in the legislation of the Republic of Moldova |
| title_sort | theoretical explanations and practices regarding the distinction between the concepts judicial error error of law and fundamental vice in the legislation of the republic of moldova |
| topic | judicial error court judge criminal trial judgment jurisdiction criminal investigation. |
| url | http://tribunajuridica.eu/arhiva/An7v11/5.%20Muntean.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT vasilisamuntean theoreticalexplanationsandpracticesregardingthedistinctionbetweentheconceptsjudicialerrorerroroflawandfundamentalviceinthelegislationoftherepublicofmoldova |