Sociospacial identity of Belgrade in the context of urban and regional development of Serbia

Based on the analyses of sociologists, historians, economists, demographers, anthropologists, and based on author’s own research, the aim of the paper is to point to the complex and dynamic sociospatial identity of contemporary Belgrade in the context of urban and regional development of po...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Vujović Sreten
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sociological Scientific Society of Serbia 2014-01-01
Series:Sociologija
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0038-0318/2014/0038-03181402145V.pdf
_version_ 1811325027805560832
author Vujović Sreten
author_facet Vujović Sreten
author_sort Vujović Sreten
collection DOAJ
description Based on the analyses of sociologists, historians, economists, demographers, anthropologists, and based on author’s own research, the aim of the paper is to point to the complex and dynamic sociospatial identity of contemporary Belgrade in the context of urban and regional development of post-socialist Serbia. The analytical framework includes, first of all, the definition of the city’s identity in terms of self-awareness of a city as sociospatial collectivity, which historically originates and develops in dependency which the city and the individuals in it establish in relationships with other cities. It then cites the various concepts by means of which identity of the modern city is constructed: the entrepreneurial city (Harvey), the creative city (Florida and Landry), the exciting city (Richards and Palmer), the city as a text (Radović), a competitive identity of the city (Anholt) and so on. In particular, Belgradization as a process of concentration of money and power in the capital is analyzed and it is concluded that the network of Serbian cities is pyramidal, that the regionalization of Serbia is asymmetric, and that Belgrade is a primate city, too big and too powerful for Serbia i.e. that Belgradization increases regional imbalance in Serbia. The paper concludes with an optimistic assessment that Belgrade, despite numerous problems in its development, has the potential to become the „European Capital of Culture” in 2020. [Projekat Ministarstva nauke Republike Srbije, br. 179035: Izazovi nove društvene integracije: koncepti i akteri]
first_indexed 2024-04-13T14:25:50Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0510768657c84e9e9086ed64b4f100d9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0038-0318
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T14:25:50Z
publishDate 2014-01-01
publisher Sociological Scientific Society of Serbia
record_format Article
series Sociologija
spelling doaj.art-0510768657c84e9e9086ed64b4f100d92022-12-22T02:43:20ZengSociological Scientific Society of SerbiaSociologija0038-03182014-01-0156214516610.2298/SOC1402145V0038-03181402145VSociospacial identity of Belgrade in the context of urban and regional development of SerbiaVujović Sreten0Filozofski fakultet, BeogradBased on the analyses of sociologists, historians, economists, demographers, anthropologists, and based on author’s own research, the aim of the paper is to point to the complex and dynamic sociospatial identity of contemporary Belgrade in the context of urban and regional development of post-socialist Serbia. The analytical framework includes, first of all, the definition of the city’s identity in terms of self-awareness of a city as sociospatial collectivity, which historically originates and develops in dependency which the city and the individuals in it establish in relationships with other cities. It then cites the various concepts by means of which identity of the modern city is constructed: the entrepreneurial city (Harvey), the creative city (Florida and Landry), the exciting city (Richards and Palmer), the city as a text (Radović), a competitive identity of the city (Anholt) and so on. In particular, Belgradization as a process of concentration of money and power in the capital is analyzed and it is concluded that the network of Serbian cities is pyramidal, that the regionalization of Serbia is asymmetric, and that Belgrade is a primate city, too big and too powerful for Serbia i.e. that Belgradization increases regional imbalance in Serbia. The paper concludes with an optimistic assessment that Belgrade, despite numerous problems in its development, has the potential to become the „European Capital of Culture” in 2020. [Projekat Ministarstva nauke Republike Srbije, br. 179035: Izazovi nove društvene integracije: koncepti i akteri]http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0038-0318/2014/0038-03181402145V.pdfurban identitycity networkregional developmentBelgradization
spellingShingle Vujović Sreten
Sociospacial identity of Belgrade in the context of urban and regional development of Serbia
Sociologija
urban identity
city network
regional development
Belgradization
title Sociospacial identity of Belgrade in the context of urban and regional development of Serbia
title_full Sociospacial identity of Belgrade in the context of urban and regional development of Serbia
title_fullStr Sociospacial identity of Belgrade in the context of urban and regional development of Serbia
title_full_unstemmed Sociospacial identity of Belgrade in the context of urban and regional development of Serbia
title_short Sociospacial identity of Belgrade in the context of urban and regional development of Serbia
title_sort sociospacial identity of belgrade in the context of urban and regional development of serbia
topic urban identity
city network
regional development
Belgradization
url http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0038-0318/2014/0038-03181402145V.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT vujovicsreten sociospacialidentityofbelgradeinthecontextofurbanandregionaldevelopmentofserbia