Statistical determinants of visuomotor adaptation along different dimensions during naturalistic 3D reaches
Abstract Neurorehabilitation in patients suffering from motor deficits relies on relearning or re-adapting motor skills. Yet our understanding of motor learning is based mostly on results from one or two-dimensional experimental paradigms with highly confined movements. Since everyday movements are...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Nature Portfolio
2022-06-01
|
Series: | Scientific Reports |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-13866-y |
_version_ | 1811242185296707584 |
---|---|
author | E. Ferrea J. Franke P. Morel A. Gail |
author_facet | E. Ferrea J. Franke P. Morel A. Gail |
author_sort | E. Ferrea |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract Neurorehabilitation in patients suffering from motor deficits relies on relearning or re-adapting motor skills. Yet our understanding of motor learning is based mostly on results from one or two-dimensional experimental paradigms with highly confined movements. Since everyday movements are conducted in three-dimensional space, it is important to further our understanding about the effect that gravitational forces or perceptual anisotropy might or might not have on motor learning along all different dimensions relative to the body. Here we test how well existing concepts of motor learning generalize to movements in 3D. We ask how a subject’s variability in movement planning and sensory perception influences motor adaptation along three different body axes. To extract variability and relate it to adaptation rate, we employed a novel hierarchical two-state space model using Bayesian modeling via Hamiltonian Monte Carlo procedures. Our results show that differences in adaptation rate occur between the coronal, sagittal and horizontal planes and can be explained by the Kalman gain, i.e., a statistically optimal solution integrating planning and sensory information weighted by the inverse of their variability. This indicates that optimal integration theory for error correction holds for 3D movements and explains adaptation rate variation between movements in different planes. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-12T13:48:06Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-0510ff1bee1a4c629ff78f8632a1ad72 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2045-2322 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-12T13:48:06Z |
publishDate | 2022-06-01 |
publisher | Nature Portfolio |
record_format | Article |
series | Scientific Reports |
spelling | doaj.art-0510ff1bee1a4c629ff78f8632a1ad722022-12-22T03:30:37ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222022-06-0112111410.1038/s41598-022-13866-yStatistical determinants of visuomotor adaptation along different dimensions during naturalistic 3D reachesE. Ferrea0J. Franke1P. Morel2A. Gail3Cognitive Neuroscience Laboratory, German Primate Center, Leibniz Institute for Primate ResearchCognitive Neuroscience Laboratory, German Primate Center, Leibniz Institute for Primate ResearchCognitive Neuroscience Laboratory, German Primate Center, Leibniz Institute for Primate ResearchCognitive Neuroscience Laboratory, German Primate Center, Leibniz Institute for Primate ResearchAbstract Neurorehabilitation in patients suffering from motor deficits relies on relearning or re-adapting motor skills. Yet our understanding of motor learning is based mostly on results from one or two-dimensional experimental paradigms with highly confined movements. Since everyday movements are conducted in three-dimensional space, it is important to further our understanding about the effect that gravitational forces or perceptual anisotropy might or might not have on motor learning along all different dimensions relative to the body. Here we test how well existing concepts of motor learning generalize to movements in 3D. We ask how a subject’s variability in movement planning and sensory perception influences motor adaptation along three different body axes. To extract variability and relate it to adaptation rate, we employed a novel hierarchical two-state space model using Bayesian modeling via Hamiltonian Monte Carlo procedures. Our results show that differences in adaptation rate occur between the coronal, sagittal and horizontal planes and can be explained by the Kalman gain, i.e., a statistically optimal solution integrating planning and sensory information weighted by the inverse of their variability. This indicates that optimal integration theory for error correction holds for 3D movements and explains adaptation rate variation between movements in different planes.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-13866-y |
spellingShingle | E. Ferrea J. Franke P. Morel A. Gail Statistical determinants of visuomotor adaptation along different dimensions during naturalistic 3D reaches Scientific Reports |
title | Statistical determinants of visuomotor adaptation along different dimensions during naturalistic 3D reaches |
title_full | Statistical determinants of visuomotor adaptation along different dimensions during naturalistic 3D reaches |
title_fullStr | Statistical determinants of visuomotor adaptation along different dimensions during naturalistic 3D reaches |
title_full_unstemmed | Statistical determinants of visuomotor adaptation along different dimensions during naturalistic 3D reaches |
title_short | Statistical determinants of visuomotor adaptation along different dimensions during naturalistic 3D reaches |
title_sort | statistical determinants of visuomotor adaptation along different dimensions during naturalistic 3d reaches |
url | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-13866-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT eferrea statisticaldeterminantsofvisuomotoradaptationalongdifferentdimensionsduringnaturalistic3dreaches AT jfranke statisticaldeterminantsofvisuomotoradaptationalongdifferentdimensionsduringnaturalistic3dreaches AT pmorel statisticaldeterminantsofvisuomotoradaptationalongdifferentdimensionsduringnaturalistic3dreaches AT agail statisticaldeterminantsofvisuomotoradaptationalongdifferentdimensionsduringnaturalistic3dreaches |