Statistical determinants of visuomotor adaptation along different dimensions during naturalistic 3D reaches

Abstract Neurorehabilitation in patients suffering from motor deficits relies on relearning or re-adapting motor skills. Yet our understanding of motor learning is based mostly on results from one or two-dimensional experimental paradigms with highly confined movements. Since everyday movements are...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: E. Ferrea, J. Franke, P. Morel, A. Gail
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2022-06-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-13866-y
_version_ 1811242185296707584
author E. Ferrea
J. Franke
P. Morel
A. Gail
author_facet E. Ferrea
J. Franke
P. Morel
A. Gail
author_sort E. Ferrea
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Neurorehabilitation in patients suffering from motor deficits relies on relearning or re-adapting motor skills. Yet our understanding of motor learning is based mostly on results from one or two-dimensional experimental paradigms with highly confined movements. Since everyday movements are conducted in three-dimensional space, it is important to further our understanding about the effect that gravitational forces or perceptual anisotropy might or might not have on motor learning along all different dimensions relative to the body. Here we test how well existing concepts of motor learning generalize to movements in 3D. We ask how a subject’s variability in movement planning and sensory perception influences motor adaptation along three different body axes. To extract variability and relate it to adaptation rate, we employed a novel hierarchical two-state space model using Bayesian modeling via Hamiltonian Monte Carlo procedures. Our results show that differences in adaptation rate occur between the coronal, sagittal and horizontal planes and can be explained by the Kalman gain, i.e., a statistically optimal solution integrating planning and sensory information weighted by the inverse of their variability. This indicates that optimal integration theory for error correction holds for 3D movements and explains adaptation rate variation between movements in different planes.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T13:48:06Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0510ff1bee1a4c629ff78f8632a1ad72
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-2322
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T13:48:06Z
publishDate 2022-06-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj.art-0510ff1bee1a4c629ff78f8632a1ad722022-12-22T03:30:37ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222022-06-0112111410.1038/s41598-022-13866-yStatistical determinants of visuomotor adaptation along different dimensions during naturalistic 3D reachesE. Ferrea0J. Franke1P. Morel2A. Gail3Cognitive Neuroscience Laboratory, German Primate Center, Leibniz Institute for Primate ResearchCognitive Neuroscience Laboratory, German Primate Center, Leibniz Institute for Primate ResearchCognitive Neuroscience Laboratory, German Primate Center, Leibniz Institute for Primate ResearchCognitive Neuroscience Laboratory, German Primate Center, Leibniz Institute for Primate ResearchAbstract Neurorehabilitation in patients suffering from motor deficits relies on relearning or re-adapting motor skills. Yet our understanding of motor learning is based mostly on results from one or two-dimensional experimental paradigms with highly confined movements. Since everyday movements are conducted in three-dimensional space, it is important to further our understanding about the effect that gravitational forces or perceptual anisotropy might or might not have on motor learning along all different dimensions relative to the body. Here we test how well existing concepts of motor learning generalize to movements in 3D. We ask how a subject’s variability in movement planning and sensory perception influences motor adaptation along three different body axes. To extract variability and relate it to adaptation rate, we employed a novel hierarchical two-state space model using Bayesian modeling via Hamiltonian Monte Carlo procedures. Our results show that differences in adaptation rate occur between the coronal, sagittal and horizontal planes and can be explained by the Kalman gain, i.e., a statistically optimal solution integrating planning and sensory information weighted by the inverse of their variability. This indicates that optimal integration theory for error correction holds for 3D movements and explains adaptation rate variation between movements in different planes.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-13866-y
spellingShingle E. Ferrea
J. Franke
P. Morel
A. Gail
Statistical determinants of visuomotor adaptation along different dimensions during naturalistic 3D reaches
Scientific Reports
title Statistical determinants of visuomotor adaptation along different dimensions during naturalistic 3D reaches
title_full Statistical determinants of visuomotor adaptation along different dimensions during naturalistic 3D reaches
title_fullStr Statistical determinants of visuomotor adaptation along different dimensions during naturalistic 3D reaches
title_full_unstemmed Statistical determinants of visuomotor adaptation along different dimensions during naturalistic 3D reaches
title_short Statistical determinants of visuomotor adaptation along different dimensions during naturalistic 3D reaches
title_sort statistical determinants of visuomotor adaptation along different dimensions during naturalistic 3d reaches
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-13866-y
work_keys_str_mv AT eferrea statisticaldeterminantsofvisuomotoradaptationalongdifferentdimensionsduringnaturalistic3dreaches
AT jfranke statisticaldeterminantsofvisuomotoradaptationalongdifferentdimensionsduringnaturalistic3dreaches
AT pmorel statisticaldeterminantsofvisuomotoradaptationalongdifferentdimensionsduringnaturalistic3dreaches
AT agail statisticaldeterminantsofvisuomotoradaptationalongdifferentdimensionsduringnaturalistic3dreaches