Creeping Bentgrass Yield Prediction With Machine Learning Models
Nitrogen is the most limiting nutrient for turfgrass growth. Instead of pursuing the maximum yield, most turfgrass managers use nitrogen (N) to maintain a sub-maximal growth rate. Few tools or soil tests exist to help managers guide N fertilizer decisions. Turf growth prediction models have the pote...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021-11-01
|
| Series: | Frontiers in Plant Science |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2021.749854/full |
| _version_ | 1798016101731270656 |
|---|---|
| author | Qiyu Zhou Douglas J. Soldat |
| author_facet | Qiyu Zhou Douglas J. Soldat |
| author_sort | Qiyu Zhou |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Nitrogen is the most limiting nutrient for turfgrass growth. Instead of pursuing the maximum yield, most turfgrass managers use nitrogen (N) to maintain a sub-maximal growth rate. Few tools or soil tests exist to help managers guide N fertilizer decisions. Turf growth prediction models have the potential to be useful, but the currently existing turf growth prediction model only takes temperature into account, limiting its accuracy. This study developed machine-learning-based turf growth models using the random forest (RF) algorithm to estimate short-term turfgrass clipping yield. To build the RF model, a large set of variables were extracted as predictors including the 7-day weather, traffic intensity, soil moisture content, N fertilization rate, and the normalized difference red edge (NDRE) vegetation index. In this study, the data were collected from two putting greens where the turfgrass received 0 to 1,800 round/week traffic rates, various irrigation rates to maintain the soil moisture content between 9 and 29%, and N fertilization rates of 0 to 17.5 kg ha–1 applied biweekly. The RF model agreed with the actual clipping yield collected from the experimental results. The temperature and relative humidity were the most important weather factors. Including NDRE improved the prediction accuracy of the model. The highest coefficient of determination (R2) of the RF model was 0.64 for the training dataset and was 0.47 for the testing data set upon the evaluation of the model. This represented a large improvement over the existing growth prediction model (R2 = 0.01). However, the machine-learning models created were not able to accurately predict the clipping production at other locations. Individual golf courses can create customized growth prediction models using clipping volume to eliminate the deviation caused by temporal and spatial variability. Overall, this study demonstrated the feasibility of creating machine-learning-based yield prediction models that may be able to guide N fertilization decisions on golf course putting greens and presumably other turfgrass areas. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-11T15:45:22Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-052d843007ba4426b2a233b9ad949dcd |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1664-462X |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-11T15:45:22Z |
| publishDate | 2021-11-01 |
| publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Frontiers in Plant Science |
| spelling | doaj.art-052d843007ba4426b2a233b9ad949dcd2022-12-22T04:15:36ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Plant Science1664-462X2021-11-011210.3389/fpls.2021.749854749854Creeping Bentgrass Yield Prediction With Machine Learning ModelsQiyu ZhouDouglas J. SoldatNitrogen is the most limiting nutrient for turfgrass growth. Instead of pursuing the maximum yield, most turfgrass managers use nitrogen (N) to maintain a sub-maximal growth rate. Few tools or soil tests exist to help managers guide N fertilizer decisions. Turf growth prediction models have the potential to be useful, but the currently existing turf growth prediction model only takes temperature into account, limiting its accuracy. This study developed machine-learning-based turf growth models using the random forest (RF) algorithm to estimate short-term turfgrass clipping yield. To build the RF model, a large set of variables were extracted as predictors including the 7-day weather, traffic intensity, soil moisture content, N fertilization rate, and the normalized difference red edge (NDRE) vegetation index. In this study, the data were collected from two putting greens where the turfgrass received 0 to 1,800 round/week traffic rates, various irrigation rates to maintain the soil moisture content between 9 and 29%, and N fertilization rates of 0 to 17.5 kg ha–1 applied biweekly. The RF model agreed with the actual clipping yield collected from the experimental results. The temperature and relative humidity were the most important weather factors. Including NDRE improved the prediction accuracy of the model. The highest coefficient of determination (R2) of the RF model was 0.64 for the training dataset and was 0.47 for the testing data set upon the evaluation of the model. This represented a large improvement over the existing growth prediction model (R2 = 0.01). However, the machine-learning models created were not able to accurately predict the clipping production at other locations. Individual golf courses can create customized growth prediction models using clipping volume to eliminate the deviation caused by temporal and spatial variability. Overall, this study demonstrated the feasibility of creating machine-learning-based yield prediction models that may be able to guide N fertilization decisions on golf course putting greens and presumably other turfgrass areas.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2021.749854/fullturfgrassnitrogen managementyield predictionmachine learningrandom forest |
| spellingShingle | Qiyu Zhou Douglas J. Soldat Creeping Bentgrass Yield Prediction With Machine Learning Models Frontiers in Plant Science turfgrass nitrogen management yield prediction machine learning random forest |
| title | Creeping Bentgrass Yield Prediction With Machine Learning Models |
| title_full | Creeping Bentgrass Yield Prediction With Machine Learning Models |
| title_fullStr | Creeping Bentgrass Yield Prediction With Machine Learning Models |
| title_full_unstemmed | Creeping Bentgrass Yield Prediction With Machine Learning Models |
| title_short | Creeping Bentgrass Yield Prediction With Machine Learning Models |
| title_sort | creeping bentgrass yield prediction with machine learning models |
| topic | turfgrass nitrogen management yield prediction machine learning random forest |
| url | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2021.749854/full |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT qiyuzhou creepingbentgrassyieldpredictionwithmachinelearningmodels AT douglasjsoldat creepingbentgrassyieldpredictionwithmachinelearningmodels |