Differences in gender performance on competitive physics selection tests
[This paper is part of the Focused Collection on Gender in Physics.] We have investigated gender differences in performance over the past eight years on the Australian Science Olympiad Exam (ASOE) for physics, which is taken by nearly 1000 high school students each year. The ASOE, run by Australian...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
American Physical Society
2016-08-01
|
| Series: | Physical Review Physics Education Research |
| Online Access: | http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.020111 |
| _version_ | 1818741201459740672 |
|---|---|
| author | Kate Wilson David Low Matthew Verdon Alix Verdon |
| author_facet | Kate Wilson David Low Matthew Verdon Alix Verdon |
| author_sort | Kate Wilson |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | [This paper is part of the Focused Collection on Gender in Physics.] We have investigated gender differences in performance over the past eight years on the Australian Science Olympiad Exam (ASOE) for physics, which is taken by nearly 1000 high school students each year. The ASOE, run by Australian Science Innovations (ASI), is the initial stage of the process of selection of teams to represent Australia at the Asian and International Physics Olympiads. Students taking the exam are generally in their penultimate year of school and selected by teachers as being high performing in physics. Together with the overall differences in facility, we have investigated how the content and presentation of multiple-choice questions (MCQs) affects the particular answers selected by male and female students. Differences in the patterns of responses by male and female students indicate that males and females might be modeling situations in different ways. Some strong patterns were found in the gender gaps when the questions were categorized in five broad dimensions: content, process required, difficulty, presentation, and context. Almost all questions saw male students performing better, although gender differences were relatively small for questions with a more abstract context. Male students performed significantly better on most questions with a concrete context, although notable exceptions were found, including two such questions where female students performed better. Other categories that showed consistently large gaps favoring male students include questions with projectile motion and other two-dimensional motion or forces content, and processes involving interpreting diagrams. Our results have important implications, suggesting that we should be able to reduce the gender gaps in performance on MCQ tests by changing the way information is presented and setting questions in contexts that are less likely to favor males over females. This is important as MCQ tests are frequently used as diagnostic tests and aptitude tests as well as to assess learning. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-18T01:52:52Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-053001408af64c52a0b0034e66d561b9 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2469-9896 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-18T01:52:52Z |
| publishDate | 2016-08-01 |
| publisher | American Physical Society |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Physical Review Physics Education Research |
| spelling | doaj.art-053001408af64c52a0b0034e66d561b92022-12-21T21:24:58ZengAmerican Physical SocietyPhysical Review Physics Education Research2469-98962016-08-0112202011110.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.020111Differences in gender performance on competitive physics selection testsKate WilsonDavid LowMatthew VerdonAlix Verdon[This paper is part of the Focused Collection on Gender in Physics.] We have investigated gender differences in performance over the past eight years on the Australian Science Olympiad Exam (ASOE) for physics, which is taken by nearly 1000 high school students each year. The ASOE, run by Australian Science Innovations (ASI), is the initial stage of the process of selection of teams to represent Australia at the Asian and International Physics Olympiads. Students taking the exam are generally in their penultimate year of school and selected by teachers as being high performing in physics. Together with the overall differences in facility, we have investigated how the content and presentation of multiple-choice questions (MCQs) affects the particular answers selected by male and female students. Differences in the patterns of responses by male and female students indicate that males and females might be modeling situations in different ways. Some strong patterns were found in the gender gaps when the questions were categorized in five broad dimensions: content, process required, difficulty, presentation, and context. Almost all questions saw male students performing better, although gender differences were relatively small for questions with a more abstract context. Male students performed significantly better on most questions with a concrete context, although notable exceptions were found, including two such questions where female students performed better. Other categories that showed consistently large gaps favoring male students include questions with projectile motion and other two-dimensional motion or forces content, and processes involving interpreting diagrams. Our results have important implications, suggesting that we should be able to reduce the gender gaps in performance on MCQ tests by changing the way information is presented and setting questions in contexts that are less likely to favor males over females. This is important as MCQ tests are frequently used as diagnostic tests and aptitude tests as well as to assess learning.http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.020111 |
| spellingShingle | Kate Wilson David Low Matthew Verdon Alix Verdon Differences in gender performance on competitive physics selection tests Physical Review Physics Education Research |
| title | Differences in gender performance on competitive physics selection tests |
| title_full | Differences in gender performance on competitive physics selection tests |
| title_fullStr | Differences in gender performance on competitive physics selection tests |
| title_full_unstemmed | Differences in gender performance on competitive physics selection tests |
| title_short | Differences in gender performance on competitive physics selection tests |
| title_sort | differences in gender performance on competitive physics selection tests |
| url | http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.020111 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT katewilson differencesingenderperformanceoncompetitivephysicsselectiontests AT davidlow differencesingenderperformanceoncompetitivephysicsselectiontests AT matthewverdon differencesingenderperformanceoncompetitivephysicsselectiontests AT alixverdon differencesingenderperformanceoncompetitivephysicsselectiontests |