Biomechanics of Aortic Dissection: A Comparison of Aortas Associated With Bicuspid and Tricuspid Aortic Valves

Background Current methods for aortic dissection risk assessment are inadequate for patients with ascending aortic aneurysms associated with either bicuspid aortic valves (BAVs) or tricuspid aortic valves (TAVs). Biomechanical testing of aortic tissue may provide novel insights and biomarkers. Metho...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jennifer C.‐Y. Chung, Edwin Wong, Mingyi Tang, Daniella Eliathamby, Thomas L. Forbes, Jagdish Butany, Craig A. Simmons, Maral Ouzounian
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-08-01
Series:Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.120.016715
_version_ 1811332368038887424
author Jennifer C.‐Y. Chung
Edwin Wong
Mingyi Tang
Daniella Eliathamby
Thomas L. Forbes
Jagdish Butany
Craig A. Simmons
Maral Ouzounian
author_facet Jennifer C.‐Y. Chung
Edwin Wong
Mingyi Tang
Daniella Eliathamby
Thomas L. Forbes
Jagdish Butany
Craig A. Simmons
Maral Ouzounian
author_sort Jennifer C.‐Y. Chung
collection DOAJ
description Background Current methods for aortic dissection risk assessment are inadequate for patients with ascending aortic aneurysms associated with either bicuspid aortic valves (BAVs) or tricuspid aortic valves (TAVs). Biomechanical testing of aortic tissue may provide novel insights and biomarkers. Methods and Results From March 2017 to August 2019, aneurysmal ascending aortas (BAV=23, TAV=23) were collected from elective aortic surgery, normal aortas from transplant donors (n=9), and dissected aortas from surgery for aortic dissection (n=7). These aortas underwent delamination testing in simulation of aortic dissection. Biaxial tensile testing was performed to determine modulus of elasticity (aortic stiffness), and energy loss (a measure of efficiency in performing the Windkessel function). Delamination strength (Sd) was lowest in dissected aortas (18±6 mN/mm) and highest in normal aortas (58±16 mN/mm), and aneurysms fell in between, with greater Sd in the BAV group (37±10 mN/mm) than the TAV group (27±10 mN/mm) (P<0.001). Bicuspid aortopathy was associated with greater stiffness (P<0.001), while aneurysms with TAV demonstrated greater energy loss (P<0.001). Sd decreased by 7.8±1.2 mmol/L per mm per decade of life (r2=0.45, P<0.001), and it was significantly lower for patients with hypertension (P=0.001). Sd decreased by 6.1±2.1 mmol/L per mm with each centimeter increase in aortic diameter (r2=0.15, P=0.007). Increased energy loss was associated with decreased Sd (r2=0.41), whereas there was no relationship between Sd and aortic stiffness. Conclusions Aneurysms with BAV had higher Sd than those with TAV, suggesting that BAV was protective. Energy loss was lower in aneurysms with BAV, and inversely associated with Sd, representing a potential novel biomarker.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T16:35:49Z
format Article
id doaj.art-054d897dedf2403e9e34ba264fc5b993
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2047-9980
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T16:35:49Z
publishDate 2020-08-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
spelling doaj.art-054d897dedf2403e9e34ba264fc5b9932022-12-22T02:39:25ZengWileyJournal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease2047-99802020-08-0191510.1161/JAHA.120.016715Biomechanics of Aortic Dissection: A Comparison of Aortas Associated With Bicuspid and Tricuspid Aortic ValvesJennifer C.‐Y. Chung0Edwin Wong1Mingyi Tang2Daniella Eliathamby3Thomas L. Forbes4Jagdish Butany5Craig A. Simmons6Maral Ouzounian7Division of Cardiovascular Surgery University Health Network Toronto ON CanadaDepartment of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering University of Toronto Toronto ON CanadaDepartment of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering University of Toronto Toronto ON CanadaDivision of Cardiovascular Surgery University Health Network Toronto ON CanadaDivision of Vascular Surgery University Health Network Toronto ON CanadaDepartment of Pathology University Health Network Toronto ON CanadaDepartment of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering University of Toronto Toronto ON CanadaDivision of Cardiovascular Surgery University Health Network Toronto ON CanadaBackground Current methods for aortic dissection risk assessment are inadequate for patients with ascending aortic aneurysms associated with either bicuspid aortic valves (BAVs) or tricuspid aortic valves (TAVs). Biomechanical testing of aortic tissue may provide novel insights and biomarkers. Methods and Results From March 2017 to August 2019, aneurysmal ascending aortas (BAV=23, TAV=23) were collected from elective aortic surgery, normal aortas from transplant donors (n=9), and dissected aortas from surgery for aortic dissection (n=7). These aortas underwent delamination testing in simulation of aortic dissection. Biaxial tensile testing was performed to determine modulus of elasticity (aortic stiffness), and energy loss (a measure of efficiency in performing the Windkessel function). Delamination strength (Sd) was lowest in dissected aortas (18±6 mN/mm) and highest in normal aortas (58±16 mN/mm), and aneurysms fell in between, with greater Sd in the BAV group (37±10 mN/mm) than the TAV group (27±10 mN/mm) (P<0.001). Bicuspid aortopathy was associated with greater stiffness (P<0.001), while aneurysms with TAV demonstrated greater energy loss (P<0.001). Sd decreased by 7.8±1.2 mmol/L per mm per decade of life (r2=0.45, P<0.001), and it was significantly lower for patients with hypertension (P=0.001). Sd decreased by 6.1±2.1 mmol/L per mm with each centimeter increase in aortic diameter (r2=0.15, P=0.007). Increased energy loss was associated with decreased Sd (r2=0.41), whereas there was no relationship between Sd and aortic stiffness. Conclusions Aneurysms with BAV had higher Sd than those with TAV, suggesting that BAV was protective. Energy loss was lower in aneurysms with BAV, and inversely associated with Sd, representing a potential novel biomarker.https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.120.016715aortic aneurysmaortic dissectionbicuspid aortic valvebiomechanics
spellingShingle Jennifer C.‐Y. Chung
Edwin Wong
Mingyi Tang
Daniella Eliathamby
Thomas L. Forbes
Jagdish Butany
Craig A. Simmons
Maral Ouzounian
Biomechanics of Aortic Dissection: A Comparison of Aortas Associated With Bicuspid and Tricuspid Aortic Valves
Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
aortic aneurysm
aortic dissection
bicuspid aortic valve
biomechanics
title Biomechanics of Aortic Dissection: A Comparison of Aortas Associated With Bicuspid and Tricuspid Aortic Valves
title_full Biomechanics of Aortic Dissection: A Comparison of Aortas Associated With Bicuspid and Tricuspid Aortic Valves
title_fullStr Biomechanics of Aortic Dissection: A Comparison of Aortas Associated With Bicuspid and Tricuspid Aortic Valves
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanics of Aortic Dissection: A Comparison of Aortas Associated With Bicuspid and Tricuspid Aortic Valves
title_short Biomechanics of Aortic Dissection: A Comparison of Aortas Associated With Bicuspid and Tricuspid Aortic Valves
title_sort biomechanics of aortic dissection a comparison of aortas associated with bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valves
topic aortic aneurysm
aortic dissection
bicuspid aortic valve
biomechanics
url https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.120.016715
work_keys_str_mv AT jennifercychung biomechanicsofaorticdissectionacomparisonofaortasassociatedwithbicuspidandtricuspidaorticvalves
AT edwinwong biomechanicsofaorticdissectionacomparisonofaortasassociatedwithbicuspidandtricuspidaorticvalves
AT mingyitang biomechanicsofaorticdissectionacomparisonofaortasassociatedwithbicuspidandtricuspidaorticvalves
AT daniellaeliathamby biomechanicsofaorticdissectionacomparisonofaortasassociatedwithbicuspidandtricuspidaorticvalves
AT thomaslforbes biomechanicsofaorticdissectionacomparisonofaortasassociatedwithbicuspidandtricuspidaorticvalves
AT jagdishbutany biomechanicsofaorticdissectionacomparisonofaortasassociatedwithbicuspidandtricuspidaorticvalves
AT craigasimmons biomechanicsofaorticdissectionacomparisonofaortasassociatedwithbicuspidandtricuspidaorticvalves
AT maralouzounian biomechanicsofaorticdissectionacomparisonofaortasassociatedwithbicuspidandtricuspidaorticvalves