Reflecting on shared decision making: A reflection‐quantification study
Abstract Background Reflecting (“stop‐and‐think”) before rating may help patients consider the quality of shared decision making (SDM) and mitigate ceiling/halo effects that limit the performance of self‐reported SDM measures. Methods We asked a diverse patient sample from the United States to refle...
Main Authors: | Marleen Kunneman, Christina M. LaVecchia, Naykky Singh Ospina, Abd Moain Abu Dabrh, Emma M. Behnken, Patrick Wilson, Megan E. Branda, Ian G. Hargraves, Kathleen J. Yost, Richard M. Frankel, Victor M. Montori |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2019-10-01
|
Series: | Health Expectations |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.12953 |
Similar Items
-
Problem‐based shared decision making: The role of canonical SDM steps
by: Victor M. Montori, et al.
Published: (2023-02-01) -
Envisioning Shared Decision Making: A Reflection for the Next Decade
by: Jennifer L. Barton, et al.
Published: (2020-10-01) -
Assessing collaborative efforts of making care fit for each patient: A systematic review
by: Marleen Kunneman, et al.
Published: (2023-08-01) -
Meeting on Neutral Ground. A Reflection on Man-Machine Contests
by: Albert Visser
Published: (2020-11-01) -
Normalization of a conversation tool to promote shared decision making about anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation within a practical randomized trial of its effectiveness: a cross-sectional study
by: Gabriela Spencer-Bonilla, et al.
Published: (2020-05-01)