Track and dive-based movement metrics do not predict the number of prey encountered by a marine predator

Abstract Background Studying animal movement in the context of the optimal foraging theory has led to the development of simple movement metrics for inferring feeding activity. Yet, the predictive capacity of these metrics in natural environments has been given little attention, raising serious ques...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hassen Allegue, Denis Réale, Baptiste Picard, Christophe Guinet
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2023-01-01
Series:Movement Ecology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40462-022-00361-2
_version_ 1797945647758835712
author Hassen Allegue
Denis Réale
Baptiste Picard
Christophe Guinet
author_facet Hassen Allegue
Denis Réale
Baptiste Picard
Christophe Guinet
author_sort Hassen Allegue
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Studying animal movement in the context of the optimal foraging theory has led to the development of simple movement metrics for inferring feeding activity. Yet, the predictive capacity of these metrics in natural environments has been given little attention, raising serious questions of the validity of these metrics. The aim of this study is to test whether simple continuous movement metrics predict feeding intensity in a marine predator, the southern elephant seal (SES; Mirounga leonine), and investigate potential factors influencing the predictive capacity of these metrics. Methods We equipped 21 female SES from the Kerguelen Archipelago with loggers and recorded their movements during post-breeding foraging trips at sea. From accelerometry, we estimated the number of prey encounter events (nPEE) and used it as a reference for feeding intensity. We also extracted several track- and dive-based movement metrics and evaluated how well they explain and predict the variance in nPEE. We conducted our analysis at two temporal scales (dive and day), with two dive profile resolutions (high at 1 Hz and low with five dive segments), and two types of models (linear models and regression trees). Results We found that none of the movement metrics predict nPEE with satisfactory power. The vertical transit rates (primarily the ascent rate) during dives had the best predictive performance among all metrics. Dive metrics performed better than track metrics and all metrics performed on average better at the scale of days than the scale of dives. However, the performance of the models at the scale of days showed higher variability among individuals suggesting distinct foraging tactics. Dive-based metrics performed better when computed from high-resolution dive profiles than low-resolution dive profiles. Finally, regression trees produced more accurate predictions than linear models. Conclusions Our study reveals that simple movement metrics do not predict feeding activity in free-ranging marine predators. This could emerge from differences between individuals, temporal scales, and the data resolution used, among many other factors. We conclude that these simple metrics should be avoided or carefully tested a priori with the studied species and the ecological context to account for significant influencing factors.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T20:58:26Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0551e1ea3a0d4f6baec907b93e06248a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2051-3933
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T20:58:26Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Movement Ecology
spelling doaj.art-0551e1ea3a0d4f6baec907b93e06248a2023-01-22T12:28:30ZengBMCMovement Ecology2051-39332023-01-0111111910.1186/s40462-022-00361-2Track and dive-based movement metrics do not predict the number of prey encountered by a marine predatorHassen Allegue0Denis Réale1Baptiste Picard2Christophe Guinet3Département des Sciences Biologiques, Université du Québec à MontréalDépartement des Sciences Biologiques, Université du Québec à MontréalCentre d’Etudes Biologiques de Chizé, UMR7372 CNRS-La Rochelle UniversitéCentre d’Etudes Biologiques de Chizé, UMR7372 CNRS-La Rochelle UniversitéAbstract Background Studying animal movement in the context of the optimal foraging theory has led to the development of simple movement metrics for inferring feeding activity. Yet, the predictive capacity of these metrics in natural environments has been given little attention, raising serious questions of the validity of these metrics. The aim of this study is to test whether simple continuous movement metrics predict feeding intensity in a marine predator, the southern elephant seal (SES; Mirounga leonine), and investigate potential factors influencing the predictive capacity of these metrics. Methods We equipped 21 female SES from the Kerguelen Archipelago with loggers and recorded their movements during post-breeding foraging trips at sea. From accelerometry, we estimated the number of prey encounter events (nPEE) and used it as a reference for feeding intensity. We also extracted several track- and dive-based movement metrics and evaluated how well they explain and predict the variance in nPEE. We conducted our analysis at two temporal scales (dive and day), with two dive profile resolutions (high at 1 Hz and low with five dive segments), and two types of models (linear models and regression trees). Results We found that none of the movement metrics predict nPEE with satisfactory power. The vertical transit rates (primarily the ascent rate) during dives had the best predictive performance among all metrics. Dive metrics performed better than track metrics and all metrics performed on average better at the scale of days than the scale of dives. However, the performance of the models at the scale of days showed higher variability among individuals suggesting distinct foraging tactics. Dive-based metrics performed better when computed from high-resolution dive profiles than low-resolution dive profiles. Finally, regression trees produced more accurate predictions than linear models. Conclusions Our study reveals that simple movement metrics do not predict feeding activity in free-ranging marine predators. This could emerge from differences between individuals, temporal scales, and the data resolution used, among many other factors. We conclude that these simple metrics should be avoided or carefully tested a priori with the studied species and the ecological context to account for significant influencing factors.https://doi.org/10.1186/s40462-022-00361-2AccelerometryArea-restricted searchDiving behaviorForaging behaviorMarine predatorPrey encounter events
spellingShingle Hassen Allegue
Denis Réale
Baptiste Picard
Christophe Guinet
Track and dive-based movement metrics do not predict the number of prey encountered by a marine predator
Movement Ecology
Accelerometry
Area-restricted search
Diving behavior
Foraging behavior
Marine predator
Prey encounter events
title Track and dive-based movement metrics do not predict the number of prey encountered by a marine predator
title_full Track and dive-based movement metrics do not predict the number of prey encountered by a marine predator
title_fullStr Track and dive-based movement metrics do not predict the number of prey encountered by a marine predator
title_full_unstemmed Track and dive-based movement metrics do not predict the number of prey encountered by a marine predator
title_short Track and dive-based movement metrics do not predict the number of prey encountered by a marine predator
title_sort track and dive based movement metrics do not predict the number of prey encountered by a marine predator
topic Accelerometry
Area-restricted search
Diving behavior
Foraging behavior
Marine predator
Prey encounter events
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s40462-022-00361-2
work_keys_str_mv AT hassenallegue trackanddivebasedmovementmetricsdonotpredictthenumberofpreyencounteredbyamarinepredator
AT denisreale trackanddivebasedmovementmetricsdonotpredictthenumberofpreyencounteredbyamarinepredator
AT baptistepicard trackanddivebasedmovementmetricsdonotpredictthenumberofpreyencounteredbyamarinepredator
AT christopheguinet trackanddivebasedmovementmetricsdonotpredictthenumberofpreyencounteredbyamarinepredator