The approach and narration of historians of the Afshariya period towards the Safavid dynasty

Official historians are often part of the government and their writings reflect the views and policies of the ruling system. They usually try to present a narrative that is consistent with the government’s thinking and attitudes. However, as far as the official historians of Afshariya are concerned,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ali Salarishadi
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Alzahra University 2022-03-01
Series:تاریخ نگری و تاریخ نگاری
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hph.alzahra.ac.ir/article_7236_c564667a6a3bba50c4c8b6bd80d03dea.pdf
_version_ 1797689318886604800
author Ali Salarishadi
author_facet Ali Salarishadi
author_sort Ali Salarishadi
collection DOAJ
description Official historians are often part of the government and their writings reflect the views and policies of the ruling system. They usually try to present a narrative that is consistent with the government’s thinking and attitudes. However, as far as the official historians of Afshariya are concerned, the matter was complicated by the political and religious complications, the fall of the Safavid dynasty and the rule of Mahmud, and the developments that led to the rise of Nader Shah. Moreover, Nader Shah pursued particular and different approaches against the Safavids. Therefore, Afshari historians found themselves in a complicated situation. Therefore, it was difficult for these historians to tell the history of the Safavids and their fall. The problem is, under such difficult circumstances, how did the Afsharian historians portray Nader's relationship with the Safavid legacy and his clashes with the Safavids? The author tries to evaluate the process and method of narration of Afshariya historians about the Safavids in those special and complex conditions with a descriptive and analytical method. The article finally comes to the conclusion that Afshari historians inevitably viewed the Safavid period with suspicion and criticism. Because Nader, who was somewhat coincidentally associated with the heir of the Safavid dynasty, Shah Tahmasb II, was always thinking of dismissing him and whenever there was a suitable opportunity, he challenged the Safavids. Therefore, Afshari historians confirmed Nadir's attitude. They insisted on the correctness of his action against the Safavids and often condemned and blamed the Safavid rule.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T01:45:02Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0569794f48414d87a0c4379cc3b49295
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2008-8841
2538-3507
language fas
last_indexed 2024-03-12T01:45:02Z
publishDate 2022-03-01
publisher Alzahra University
record_format Article
series تاریخ نگری و تاریخ نگاری
spelling doaj.art-0569794f48414d87a0c4379cc3b492952023-09-09T10:25:06ZfasAlzahra Universityتاریخ نگری و تاریخ نگاری2008-88412538-35072022-03-01322915918210.22051/hph.2023.42870.16517236The approach and narration of historians of the Afshariya period towards the Safavid dynastyAli Salarishadi0Associate Professor of the Institute of Humanities and Cultural Studies,Thren, Iran.Official historians are often part of the government and their writings reflect the views and policies of the ruling system. They usually try to present a narrative that is consistent with the government’s thinking and attitudes. However, as far as the official historians of Afshariya are concerned, the matter was complicated by the political and religious complications, the fall of the Safavid dynasty and the rule of Mahmud, and the developments that led to the rise of Nader Shah. Moreover, Nader Shah pursued particular and different approaches against the Safavids. Therefore, Afshari historians found themselves in a complicated situation. Therefore, it was difficult for these historians to tell the history of the Safavids and their fall. The problem is, under such difficult circumstances, how did the Afsharian historians portray Nader's relationship with the Safavid legacy and his clashes with the Safavids? The author tries to evaluate the process and method of narration of Afshariya historians about the Safavids in those special and complex conditions with a descriptive and analytical method. The article finally comes to the conclusion that Afshari historians inevitably viewed the Safavid period with suspicion and criticism. Because Nader, who was somewhat coincidentally associated with the heir of the Safavid dynasty, Shah Tahmasb II, was always thinking of dismissing him and whenever there was a suitable opportunity, he challenged the Safavids. Therefore, Afshari historians confirmed Nadir's attitude. They insisted on the correctness of his action against the Safavids and often condemned and blamed the Safavid rule.https://hph.alzahra.ac.ir/article_7236_c564667a6a3bba50c4c8b6bd80d03dea.pdfhistoriansestrabadimervimustafinadersafavid
spellingShingle Ali Salarishadi
The approach and narration of historians of the Afshariya period towards the Safavid dynasty
تاریخ نگری و تاریخ نگاری
historians
estrabadi
mervi
mustafi
nader
safavid
title The approach and narration of historians of the Afshariya period towards the Safavid dynasty
title_full The approach and narration of historians of the Afshariya period towards the Safavid dynasty
title_fullStr The approach and narration of historians of the Afshariya period towards the Safavid dynasty
title_full_unstemmed The approach and narration of historians of the Afshariya period towards the Safavid dynasty
title_short The approach and narration of historians of the Afshariya period towards the Safavid dynasty
title_sort approach and narration of historians of the afshariya period towards the safavid dynasty
topic historians
estrabadi
mervi
mustafi
nader
safavid
url https://hph.alzahra.ac.ir/article_7236_c564667a6a3bba50c4c8b6bd80d03dea.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT alisalarishadi theapproachandnarrationofhistoriansoftheafshariyaperiodtowardsthesafaviddynasty
AT alisalarishadi approachandnarrationofhistoriansoftheafshariyaperiodtowardsthesafaviddynasty