Bioresorbable Scaffolds: Contemporary Status and Future Directions

Bioresorbable Scaffolds: Contemporary Status and Future Directions

Percutaneous coronary intervention, which is safe, effective, and timely, has become an important treatment for coronary artery diseases and has been widely used in clinical practice. However, there are still some problems that urgently need to be solved. Permanent vessel caging through metallic imp...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Xiang Peng, Wenbo Qu, Ying Jia, Yani Wang, Bo Yu, Jinwei Tian
Format:	Article
Language:	English
Published:	Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-11-01
Series:	Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Subjects:	bioresorbable scaffolds percutaneous coronary intervention absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold scaffold thrombosis intravascular imaging
Online Access:	https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2020.589571/full

Similar Items

Effect of implantation technique on outcomes in patients receiving bioresorbable scaffolds in various clinical scenarios
by: Luis Ortega-Paz, et al.
Published: (2019-05-01)

Bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) for the treatment of native coronary artery stenosis: one year
by: Hazem Khamis, et al.
Published: (2016-12-01)

Long-term safety and absorption assessment of a novel bioresorbable nitrided iron scaffold in porcine coronary artery
by: Jian-Feng Zheng, et al.
Published: (2022-11-01)

Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds technology: current use and future developments
by: Giacchi G, et al.
Published: (2016-07-01)

Management of immediate partial bioresorbable vascular scaffold stent thrombosis
by: Ziad Said Dahdouh, et al.
Published: (2017-03-01)

The standard versus prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy after the XINSORB bioresorbable scaffold implantation (SPARTA) trial: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
by: Yizhe Wu, et al.
Published: (2023-01-01)

Dissections after bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation in the POLAR ACS Registry
by: Wojciech Zasada, et al.
Published: (2022-08-01)

Long-Term Outcomes After Implantation of Magnesium-Based Bioresorbable Scaffolds—Insights From an All-Comer Registry
by: Matthias Bossard, et al.
Published: (2022-04-01)

Bioresorbable scaffolds: current concepts and future technology
by: Debabrata Dash, et al.
Published: (2022-08-01)

Long-term outcome of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds for the treatment of coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of RCTs
by: Alberto Polimeni, et al.
Published: (2017-06-01)

A case report of a recurrent early and late Bioresorbable vascular scaffold thrombosis: serial angiography and optical coherence tomography findings
by: Cheol Hyun Lee, et al.
Published: (2020-03-01)

Bioresorbable polymeric scaffold in cardiovascular applications
by: Toong, Daniel Wee Yee, et al.
Published: (2021)

Optimal lesion preparation before implantation of a Magmaris bioresorbable scaffold in patients with coronary artery stenosis: Rationale, design and methodology of the OPTIMIS study
by: Kirstine Nørregaard Hansen, et al.
Published: (2024-04-01)

Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold (ABSORB BVS); first report in Egyptian patients with 6 month angiographic/IVUS follow up
by: Hazem Khamis, et al.
Published: (2014-09-01)

Bioresorbable Polymeric Scaffold in Cardiovascular Applications
by: Daniel Wee Yee Toong, et al.
Published: (2020-05-01)

Everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds for treatment of coronary artery disease in patients with diabetes mellitus: the midterm follow-up of the prospective ABSORB DM Benelux study
by: T. M. Hommels, et al.
Published: (2019-03-01)

Bioresorbable scaffold -fourth revolution or failed revolution: Is low scaffold strut thickness the wrong target?
by: Sundeep Mishra
Published: (2017-11-01)

Three-years outcomes of diabetic patients treated with coronary bioresorbable scaffolds
by: Remzi Anadol, et al.
Published: (2018-05-01)

Long-term comparison of everolimus- vs. novolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds in real world patients
by: Beytullah Cakal, et al.
Published: (2020-12-01)

Early and long-term outcomes of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds in the treatment of patients with coronary artery disease in real-world clinical practice – insights from the ZABRZE-BVS registry
by: Jacek Piegza, et al.
Published: (2018-12-01)

Understanding the Impact of Stent and Scaffold Material and Strut Design on Coronary Artery Thrombosis from the Basic and Clinical Points of View
by: Atsushi Sakamoto, et al.
Published: (2018-09-01)

Drug-eluting, balloon-expandable, bioresorbable vascular scaffolds reduce neointimal thickness and stenosis in an animal model of percutaneous peripheral intervention
by: Rym El Khoury, MD, et al.
Published: (2023-01-01)

One-Year Results of the Use of Absorb Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold in Patients with Different Forms of Coronary Artery Disease as Compared to a Drug-Eluting Stent
by: Nabijon P. Yuldashev, et al.
Published: (2018-03-01)

Acute Mechanical Performance of Magmaris vs. DESolve Bioresorbable Scaffolds in a Real-World Scenario
by: Niklas F. Boeder, et al.
Published: (2021-06-01)

Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds for percutaneous treatment of chronic total coronary occlusions: a meta-analysis
by: Alberto Polimeni, et al.
Published: (2019-03-01)

Low major adverse cardiac event rates following bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation: Impact of implantation technique on treatment outcomes
by: Anne Venkata Ganeshkumar, et al.
Published: (2018-01-01)

Implantation of a bioresorbable vascular scaffold for a left anterior descending artery lesion in a patient with dextrocardia and situs inversus: A rare case with three-year follow-up
by: Vilas Magarkar, et al.
Published: (2017-05-01)

Mid-term safe and effective profile of the Magmaris scaffold in percutaneous coronary intervention: a prospective, single-center study
by: Binh Quang Truong, et al.
Published: (2023-05-01)

Nanoparticles-reinforced poly-l-lactic acid composite materials as bioresorbable scaffold candidates for coronary stents: insights from mechanical and finite element analysis
by: Toong, Daniel Wee Yee, et al.
Published: (2022)

Two-stage degradation and novel functional endothelium characteristics of a 3-D printed bioresorbable scaffold
by: Tieying Yin, et al.
Published: (2022-04-01)

Feasibility, safety, and efficacy of iron bioresorbable scaffold in neonates with duct-dependent pulmonary circulation
by: Marhisham Che Mood, et al.
Published: (2022-01-01)

Clinical presentation does not affect acute mechanical performance of the Novolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold as assessed by optical coherence tomography
by: Niklas Boeder, et al.
Published: (2021-09-01)

Clinical and angiographic outcomes at more than 1 year after treatment of chronic total occlusions with the everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold
by: Aylin Hatice Yamac, et al.
Published: (2016-12-01)

Bioresorbable Coronary Scaffolds: Current State of Evidence
by: Sunny Goel, et al.
Published: (2017-10-01)

Quality of life of patients with coronary heart disease treated with the bioresorbable vascular scaffold (ABSORB™): 2-year results from the GABI-R-registry
by: Kathrin Pahmeier, et al.
Published: (2022-08-01)

Highlighting Hemodynamic Risks for Bioresorbable Stents in Coronary Arteries
by: Marcus S. Elliott, et al.
Published: (2023-08-01)

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE INFLAMMATORY RESPOND OF THE VASCULAR WALL AFTER IMPLANTATION OF BIORESORBABLE SCAFFOLDS AND EVEROLIMUS COVERED STENTS IN PATIENTS WITH STABLE CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE
by: N. A. Musikhina, et al.
Published: (2019-02-01)

Bioresorbable scaffolds: History and current knowledge
by: Min Ma, et al.
Published: (2016-01-01)

Bioresorbable vascular scaffold for coronary in-stent restenosis: A novel concept
by: Surender Deora, et al.
Published: (2014-07-01)

Bioresorbable Scaffolds: Current Technology and Future Perspectives
by: Brian Forrestal, et al.
Published: (2020-04-01)