Sequential and simultaneous multiple explanation

This paper reports two experiments comparing variants of multiple explanation applied in the early stages of a judgment task (a case involving employee theft) where participants are not given a menu of response options. Because prior research has focused on situations where response options are prov...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Robert Litchfield, Jinyan Fan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2007-02-01
Series:Judgment and Decision Making
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.sjdm.org/jdm06141.pdf
_version_ 1797723732080328704
author Robert Litchfield
Jinyan Fan
author_facet Robert Litchfield
Jinyan Fan
author_sort Robert Litchfield
collection DOAJ
description This paper reports two experiments comparing variants of multiple explanation applied in the early stages of a judgment task (a case involving employee theft) where participants are not given a menu of response options. Because prior research has focused on situations where response options are provided to judges, we identify relevant dependent variables that an intervention might affect when such options are not given. We use these variables to build a causal model of intervention that illustrates both the intended effects of multiple explanation and some potentially competing processes that it may trigger. Although multiple explanation clearly conveys some benefits (e.g., willingness to delay action to engage in information search, increased detail, quality and confidence in alternative explanations) in the present experiments, we also found evidence that it may initiate or enhance processes that attenuate its advantages (e.g., feelings that one does not need more data if one has multiple good explanations).
first_indexed 2024-03-12T10:07:00Z
format Article
id doaj.art-059630d40f81435b81439d66ed0d6e30
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1930-2975
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T10:07:00Z
publishDate 2007-02-01
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format Article
series Judgment and Decision Making
spelling doaj.art-059630d40f81435b81439d66ed0d6e302023-09-02T11:09:39ZengCambridge University PressJudgment and Decision Making1930-29752007-02-012NA5469Sequential and simultaneous multiple explanationRobert LitchfieldJinyan FanThis paper reports two experiments comparing variants of multiple explanation applied in the early stages of a judgment task (a case involving employee theft) where participants are not given a menu of response options. Because prior research has focused on situations where response options are provided to judges, we identify relevant dependent variables that an intervention might affect when such options are not given. We use these variables to build a causal model of intervention that illustrates both the intended effects of multiple explanation and some potentially competing processes that it may trigger. Although multiple explanation clearly conveys some benefits (e.g., willingness to delay action to engage in information search, increased detail, quality and confidence in alternative explanations) in the present experiments, we also found evidence that it may initiate or enhance processes that attenuate its advantages (e.g., feelings that one does not need more data if one has multiple good explanations).http://journal.sjdm.org/jdm06141.pdfexplanationalternative considerationscenarioplanningdebiasing.
spellingShingle Robert Litchfield
Jinyan Fan
Sequential and simultaneous multiple explanation
Judgment and Decision Making
explanation
alternative consideration
scenarioplanning
debiasing.
title Sequential and simultaneous multiple explanation
title_full Sequential and simultaneous multiple explanation
title_fullStr Sequential and simultaneous multiple explanation
title_full_unstemmed Sequential and simultaneous multiple explanation
title_short Sequential and simultaneous multiple explanation
title_sort sequential and simultaneous multiple explanation
topic explanation
alternative consideration
scenarioplanning
debiasing.
url http://journal.sjdm.org/jdm06141.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT robertlitchfield sequentialandsimultaneousmultipleexplanation
AT jinyanfan sequentialandsimultaneousmultipleexplanation