Anterolateral Versus Posterolateral Approach for Lateral Condylar Fractures of the Humerus in Children

Background:. Two surgical approaches, an anterolateral and a posterolateral approach, have been advocated for lateral condylar fractures (LCFs) of the humerus in children. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the radiographic and clinical outcomes of the 2 surgical approaches. Methods:. We retr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yuji Tomori, MD, PhD, Mitsuhiko Nanno, MD, PhD, Shinro Takai, MD, PhD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer 2020-12-01
Series:JBJS Open Access
Online Access:http://journals.lww.com/jbjsoa/fulltext/10.2106/JBJS.OA.20.00035
_version_ 1797375017914204160
author Yuji Tomori, MD, PhD
Mitsuhiko Nanno, MD, PhD
Shinro Takai, MD, PhD
author_facet Yuji Tomori, MD, PhD
Mitsuhiko Nanno, MD, PhD
Shinro Takai, MD, PhD
author_sort Yuji Tomori, MD, PhD
collection DOAJ
description Background:. Two surgical approaches, an anterolateral and a posterolateral approach, have been advocated for lateral condylar fractures (LCFs) of the humerus in children. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the radiographic and clinical outcomes of the 2 surgical approaches. Methods:. We retrospectively analyzed the data of consecutive patients <15 years of age with an LCF treated via open reduction and internal fixation through 1 of 2 surgical approaches during the period of April 2000 to March 2019. Patients were classified into the anterolateral (AL) and posterolateral (PL) groups, according to the surgical approach used. Postoperative complications and radiographic and clinical findings (including range of motion and findings on the basis of the Flynn criteria) were investigated. To investigate humeral deformity, the Baumann angle and the carrying angle were measured on anteroposterior radiographs. Results:. Sixty-one of 82 patients met the inclusion criteria. The AL group included 17 patients (13 male, 4 female), and the PL group included 44 patients (28 male, 16 female). In the PL group, 7 patients had cubitus varus deformity, 3 had malunion due to unacceptable reduction of fracture fragments, and 6 had elbow joint contracture. In the AL group, the overall clinical results were excellent for 15 patients and good for 2. In the PL group, the clinical results were excellent for 12 patients, good for 14, fair for 6, and poor for 12. Conclusions:. An anterolateral approach would be the optimal approach for an LCF in pediatric patients. Level of Evidence:. Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T19:16:07Z
format Article
id doaj.art-05b5e4e2e5d449feb716ad2232c3f5fa
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2472-7245
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T19:16:07Z
publishDate 2020-12-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer
record_format Article
series JBJS Open Access
spelling doaj.art-05b5e4e2e5d449feb716ad2232c3f5fa2023-12-27T06:50:47ZengWolters KluwerJBJS Open Access2472-72452020-12-0154e20.00035e20.0003510.2106/JBJS.OA.20.00035JBJSOA2000035Anterolateral Versus Posterolateral Approach for Lateral Condylar Fractures of the Humerus in ChildrenYuji Tomori, MD, PhD0Mitsuhiko Nanno, MD, PhD1Shinro Takai, MD, PhD21 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, JapanBackground:. Two surgical approaches, an anterolateral and a posterolateral approach, have been advocated for lateral condylar fractures (LCFs) of the humerus in children. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the radiographic and clinical outcomes of the 2 surgical approaches. Methods:. We retrospectively analyzed the data of consecutive patients <15 years of age with an LCF treated via open reduction and internal fixation through 1 of 2 surgical approaches during the period of April 2000 to March 2019. Patients were classified into the anterolateral (AL) and posterolateral (PL) groups, according to the surgical approach used. Postoperative complications and radiographic and clinical findings (including range of motion and findings on the basis of the Flynn criteria) were investigated. To investigate humeral deformity, the Baumann angle and the carrying angle were measured on anteroposterior radiographs. Results:. Sixty-one of 82 patients met the inclusion criteria. The AL group included 17 patients (13 male, 4 female), and the PL group included 44 patients (28 male, 16 female). In the PL group, 7 patients had cubitus varus deformity, 3 had malunion due to unacceptable reduction of fracture fragments, and 6 had elbow joint contracture. In the AL group, the overall clinical results were excellent for 15 patients and good for 2. In the PL group, the clinical results were excellent for 12 patients, good for 14, fair for 6, and poor for 12. Conclusions:. An anterolateral approach would be the optimal approach for an LCF in pediatric patients. Level of Evidence:. Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.http://journals.lww.com/jbjsoa/fulltext/10.2106/JBJS.OA.20.00035
spellingShingle Yuji Tomori, MD, PhD
Mitsuhiko Nanno, MD, PhD
Shinro Takai, MD, PhD
Anterolateral Versus Posterolateral Approach for Lateral Condylar Fractures of the Humerus in Children
JBJS Open Access
title Anterolateral Versus Posterolateral Approach for Lateral Condylar Fractures of the Humerus in Children
title_full Anterolateral Versus Posterolateral Approach for Lateral Condylar Fractures of the Humerus in Children
title_fullStr Anterolateral Versus Posterolateral Approach for Lateral Condylar Fractures of the Humerus in Children
title_full_unstemmed Anterolateral Versus Posterolateral Approach for Lateral Condylar Fractures of the Humerus in Children
title_short Anterolateral Versus Posterolateral Approach for Lateral Condylar Fractures of the Humerus in Children
title_sort anterolateral versus posterolateral approach for lateral condylar fractures of the humerus in children
url http://journals.lww.com/jbjsoa/fulltext/10.2106/JBJS.OA.20.00035
work_keys_str_mv AT yujitomorimdphd anterolateralversusposterolateralapproachforlateralcondylarfracturesofthehumerusinchildren
AT mitsuhikonannomdphd anterolateralversusposterolateralapproachforlateralcondylarfracturesofthehumerusinchildren
AT shinrotakaimdphd anterolateralversusposterolateralapproachforlateralcondylarfracturesofthehumerusinchildren