Between-population differences in the genetic and maternal components of body mass in roe deer
Abstract Background Understanding the genetic and environmental mechanisms governing variation in morphology or phenology in wild populations is currently an important challenge. While there is a general consensus that selection is stronger under stressful conditions, it remains unclear whether the...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMC
2018-03-01
|
| Series: | BMC Evolutionary Biology |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12862-018-1154-9 |
| _version_ | 1819136732057042944 |
|---|---|
| author | E. Quéméré J. M. Gaillard M. Galan C. Vanpé I. David M. Pellerin P. Kjellander A. J. M. Hewison J. M. Pemberton |
| author_facet | E. Quéméré J. M. Gaillard M. Galan C. Vanpé I. David M. Pellerin P. Kjellander A. J. M. Hewison J. M. Pemberton |
| author_sort | E. Quéméré |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Background Understanding the genetic and environmental mechanisms governing variation in morphology or phenology in wild populations is currently an important challenge. While there is a general consensus that selection is stronger under stressful conditions, it remains unclear whether the evolutionary potential of traits should increase or decrease with increasingly stressful conditions. Here, we investigate how contrasting environmental conditions during growth may affect the maternal and genetic components of body mass in roe deer, the most abundant and widespread wild ungulate in Western Europe. Body mass is a key life history trait that strongly influences both survival and reproductive performance in large herbivores. We used pedigrees and animal models to determine the variance components of juvenile and adult winter body mass in two populations experiencing contrasting early-life conditions. Results Our analyses showed that roe deer at Chizé, where habitat was poor and unpredictable, exhibited very low genetic variance in juvenile body mass. Instead, variance in mass was mainly driven by among-cohort differences in early-life conditions and maternal environment. In contrast, roe deer at Bogesund, where resource availability during the critical period of fawn rearing was higher, displayed a substantial level of genetic variance in body mass. We discuss the potential role of past demography and viability selection on fawn body mass on the erosion of genetic variance in the poor habitat. Conclusions Our study highlights the importance of accounting for both spatial (i.e. between-population variation) and temporal (i.e. cohort variation) heterogeneity in environmental conditions, especially in early life, to understand the potential for adaptive responses of wild populations to selection. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-22T10:39:39Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-05c3a800dc1d4d4ba253edd47ce83ba1 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1471-2148 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-22T10:39:39Z |
| publishDate | 2018-03-01 |
| publisher | BMC |
| record_format | Article |
| series | BMC Evolutionary Biology |
| spelling | doaj.art-05c3a800dc1d4d4ba253edd47ce83ba12022-12-21T18:29:04ZengBMCBMC Evolutionary Biology1471-21482018-03-0118111010.1186/s12862-018-1154-9Between-population differences in the genetic and maternal components of body mass in roe deerE. Quéméré0J. M. Gaillard1M. Galan2C. Vanpé3I. David4M. Pellerin5P. Kjellander6A. J. M. Hewison7J. M. Pemberton8CEFS, INRA, Université de ToulouseUniversité Lyon 1, CNRS, UMR 5558, Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie EvolutiveCBGP, INRA, CIRAD, IRD, Montpellier SupAgro, Univ. MontpellierUniversité Lyon 1, CNRS, UMR 5558, Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie EvolutiveGenPhySE, INRA, Université de Toulouse, ENVTONCFS, DER, UR Cervidés-SanglierGrimsö Wildlife Research Station, Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural SciencesCEFS, INRA, Université de ToulouseInstitute of Evolutionary Biology, School of Biological Sciences, University of EdinburghAbstract Background Understanding the genetic and environmental mechanisms governing variation in morphology or phenology in wild populations is currently an important challenge. While there is a general consensus that selection is stronger under stressful conditions, it remains unclear whether the evolutionary potential of traits should increase or decrease with increasingly stressful conditions. Here, we investigate how contrasting environmental conditions during growth may affect the maternal and genetic components of body mass in roe deer, the most abundant and widespread wild ungulate in Western Europe. Body mass is a key life history trait that strongly influences both survival and reproductive performance in large herbivores. We used pedigrees and animal models to determine the variance components of juvenile and adult winter body mass in two populations experiencing contrasting early-life conditions. Results Our analyses showed that roe deer at Chizé, where habitat was poor and unpredictable, exhibited very low genetic variance in juvenile body mass. Instead, variance in mass was mainly driven by among-cohort differences in early-life conditions and maternal environment. In contrast, roe deer at Bogesund, where resource availability during the critical period of fawn rearing was higher, displayed a substantial level of genetic variance in body mass. We discuss the potential role of past demography and viability selection on fawn body mass on the erosion of genetic variance in the poor habitat. Conclusions Our study highlights the importance of accounting for both spatial (i.e. between-population variation) and temporal (i.e. cohort variation) heterogeneity in environmental conditions, especially in early life, to understand the potential for adaptive responses of wild populations to selection.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12862-018-1154-9Additive genetic varianceAnimal modelHeritabilityMammalsUngulatesCapreolus capreolus |
| spellingShingle | E. Quéméré J. M. Gaillard M. Galan C. Vanpé I. David M. Pellerin P. Kjellander A. J. M. Hewison J. M. Pemberton Between-population differences in the genetic and maternal components of body mass in roe deer BMC Evolutionary Biology Additive genetic variance Animal model Heritability Mammals Ungulates Capreolus capreolus |
| title | Between-population differences in the genetic and maternal components of body mass in roe deer |
| title_full | Between-population differences in the genetic and maternal components of body mass in roe deer |
| title_fullStr | Between-population differences in the genetic and maternal components of body mass in roe deer |
| title_full_unstemmed | Between-population differences in the genetic and maternal components of body mass in roe deer |
| title_short | Between-population differences in the genetic and maternal components of body mass in roe deer |
| title_sort | between population differences in the genetic and maternal components of body mass in roe deer |
| topic | Additive genetic variance Animal model Heritability Mammals Ungulates Capreolus capreolus |
| url | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12862-018-1154-9 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT equemere betweenpopulationdifferencesinthegeneticandmaternalcomponentsofbodymassinroedeer AT jmgaillard betweenpopulationdifferencesinthegeneticandmaternalcomponentsofbodymassinroedeer AT mgalan betweenpopulationdifferencesinthegeneticandmaternalcomponentsofbodymassinroedeer AT cvanpe betweenpopulationdifferencesinthegeneticandmaternalcomponentsofbodymassinroedeer AT idavid betweenpopulationdifferencesinthegeneticandmaternalcomponentsofbodymassinroedeer AT mpellerin betweenpopulationdifferencesinthegeneticandmaternalcomponentsofbodymassinroedeer AT pkjellander betweenpopulationdifferencesinthegeneticandmaternalcomponentsofbodymassinroedeer AT ajmhewison betweenpopulationdifferencesinthegeneticandmaternalcomponentsofbodymassinroedeer AT jmpemberton betweenpopulationdifferencesinthegeneticandmaternalcomponentsofbodymassinroedeer |