Relative Greenhouse Gas Abatement Cost Competitiveness of Biofuels in Germany

Transport biofuels derived from biogenic material are used for substituting fossil fuels, thereby abating greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Numerous competing conversion options exist to produce biofuels, with differing GHG emissions and costs. In this paper, the analysis and modeling of the long-term...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Markus Millinger, Kathleen Meisel, Maik Budzinski, Daniela Thrän
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2018-03-01
Series:Energies
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/3/615
_version_ 1811184686974631936
author Markus Millinger
Kathleen Meisel
Maik Budzinski
Daniela Thrän
author_facet Markus Millinger
Kathleen Meisel
Maik Budzinski
Daniela Thrän
author_sort Markus Millinger
collection DOAJ
description Transport biofuels derived from biogenic material are used for substituting fossil fuels, thereby abating greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Numerous competing conversion options exist to produce biofuels, with differing GHG emissions and costs. In this paper, the analysis and modeling of the long-term development of GHG abatement and relative GHG abatement cost competitiveness between crop-based biofuels in Germany are carried out. Presently dominant conventional biofuels and advanced liquid biofuels were found not to be competitive compared to the substantially higher yielding options available: sugar beet-based ethanol for the short- to medium-term least-cost option and substitute natural gas (SNG) for the medium to long term. The competitiveness of SNG was found to depend highly on the emissions development of the power mix. Silage maize-based biomethane was found competitive on a land area basis, but not on an energetic basis. Due to land limitations, as well as cost and GHG uncertainty, a stronger focus on the land use of crop-based biofuels should be laid out in policy.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T13:16:36Z
format Article
id doaj.art-05c45b4dc1214cadb49b728bb5a771f0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1996-1073
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T13:16:36Z
publishDate 2018-03-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Energies
spelling doaj.art-05c45b4dc1214cadb49b728bb5a771f02022-12-22T04:22:22ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732018-03-0111361510.3390/en11030615en11030615Relative Greenhouse Gas Abatement Cost Competitiveness of Biofuels in GermanyMarkus Millinger0Kathleen Meisel1Maik Budzinski2Daniela Thrän3Department of Bioenergy, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research—UFZ, Permoserstraße 15, 04318 Leipzig, GermanyDepartment of Bioenergy Systems, Deutsches Biomasseforschungszentrum gemeinnützige GmbH—DBFZ, Torgauer Straße 116, 04347 Leipzig, GermanyDepartment of Bioenergy, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research—UFZ, Permoserstraße 15, 04318 Leipzig, GermanyDepartment of Bioenergy, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research—UFZ, Permoserstraße 15, 04318 Leipzig, GermanyTransport biofuels derived from biogenic material are used for substituting fossil fuels, thereby abating greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Numerous competing conversion options exist to produce biofuels, with differing GHG emissions and costs. In this paper, the analysis and modeling of the long-term development of GHG abatement and relative GHG abatement cost competitiveness between crop-based biofuels in Germany are carried out. Presently dominant conventional biofuels and advanced liquid biofuels were found not to be competitive compared to the substantially higher yielding options available: sugar beet-based ethanol for the short- to medium-term least-cost option and substitute natural gas (SNG) for the medium to long term. The competitiveness of SNG was found to depend highly on the emissions development of the power mix. Silage maize-based biomethane was found competitive on a land area basis, but not on an energetic basis. Due to land limitations, as well as cost and GHG uncertainty, a stronger focus on the land use of crop-based biofuels should be laid out in policy.http://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/3/615biofuelsgreenhouse gasGHGabatement costmodelingcompetition
spellingShingle Markus Millinger
Kathleen Meisel
Maik Budzinski
Daniela Thrän
Relative Greenhouse Gas Abatement Cost Competitiveness of Biofuels in Germany
Energies
biofuels
greenhouse gas
GHG
abatement cost
modeling
competition
title Relative Greenhouse Gas Abatement Cost Competitiveness of Biofuels in Germany
title_full Relative Greenhouse Gas Abatement Cost Competitiveness of Biofuels in Germany
title_fullStr Relative Greenhouse Gas Abatement Cost Competitiveness of Biofuels in Germany
title_full_unstemmed Relative Greenhouse Gas Abatement Cost Competitiveness of Biofuels in Germany
title_short Relative Greenhouse Gas Abatement Cost Competitiveness of Biofuels in Germany
title_sort relative greenhouse gas abatement cost competitiveness of biofuels in germany
topic biofuels
greenhouse gas
GHG
abatement cost
modeling
competition
url http://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/3/615
work_keys_str_mv AT markusmillinger relativegreenhousegasabatementcostcompetitivenessofbiofuelsingermany
AT kathleenmeisel relativegreenhousegasabatementcostcompetitivenessofbiofuelsingermany
AT maikbudzinski relativegreenhousegasabatementcostcompetitivenessofbiofuelsingermany
AT danielathran relativegreenhousegasabatementcostcompetitivenessofbiofuelsingermany