Denoising diffusion-based MRI to CT image translation enables automated spinal segmentation

Abstract Background Automated segmentation of spinal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays a vital role both scientifically and clinically. However, accurately delineating posterior spine structures is challenging. Methods This retrospective study, approved by the ethical committee, involved transl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Robert Graf, Joachim Schmitt, Sarah Schlaeger, Hendrik Kristian Möller, Vasiliki Sideri-Lampretsa, Anjany Sekuboyina, Sandro Manuel Krieg, Benedikt Wiestler, Bjoern Menze, Daniel Rueckert, Jan Stefan Kirschke
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2023-11-01
Series:European Radiology Experimental
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s41747-023-00385-2
_version_ 1797578223001796608
author Robert Graf
Joachim Schmitt
Sarah Schlaeger
Hendrik Kristian Möller
Vasiliki Sideri-Lampretsa
Anjany Sekuboyina
Sandro Manuel Krieg
Benedikt Wiestler
Bjoern Menze
Daniel Rueckert
Jan Stefan Kirschke
author_facet Robert Graf
Joachim Schmitt
Sarah Schlaeger
Hendrik Kristian Möller
Vasiliki Sideri-Lampretsa
Anjany Sekuboyina
Sandro Manuel Krieg
Benedikt Wiestler
Bjoern Menze
Daniel Rueckert
Jan Stefan Kirschke
author_sort Robert Graf
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Automated segmentation of spinal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays a vital role both scientifically and clinically. However, accurately delineating posterior spine structures is challenging. Methods This retrospective study, approved by the ethical committee, involved translating T1-weighted and T2-weighted images into computed tomography (CT) images in a total of 263 pairs of CT/MR series. Landmark-based registration was performed to align image pairs. We compared two-dimensional (2D) paired — Pix2Pix, denoising diffusion implicit models (DDIM) image mode, DDIM noise mode — and unpaired (SynDiff, contrastive unpaired translation) image-to-image translation using “peak signal-to-noise ratio” as quality measure. A publicly available segmentation network segmented the synthesized CT datasets, and Dice similarity coefficients (DSC) were evaluated on in-house test sets and the “MRSpineSeg Challenge” volumes. The 2D findings were extended to three-dimensional (3D) Pix2Pix and DDIM. Results 2D paired methods and SynDiff exhibited similar translation performance and DCS on paired data. DDIM image mode achieved the highest image quality. SynDiff, Pix2Pix, and DDIM image mode demonstrated similar DSC (0.77). For craniocaudal axis rotations, at least two landmarks per vertebra were required for registration. The 3D translation outperformed the 2D approach, resulting in improved DSC (0.80) and anatomically accurate segmentations with higher spatial resolution than that of the original MRI series. Conclusions Two landmarks per vertebra registration enabled paired image-to-image translation from MRI to CT and outperformed all unpaired approaches. The 3D techniques provided anatomically correct segmentations, avoiding underprediction of small structures like the spinous process. Relevance statement This study addresses the unresolved issue of translating spinal MRI to CT, making CT-based tools usable for MRI data. It generates whole spine segmentation, previously unavailable in MRI, a prerequisite for biomechanical modeling and feature extraction for clinical applications. Key points • Unpaired image translation lacks in converting spine MRI to CT effectively. • Paired translation needs registration with two landmarks per vertebra at least. • Paired image-to-image enables segmentation transfer to other domains. • 3D translation enables super resolution from MRI to CT. • 3D translation prevents underprediction of small structures. Graphical Abstract
first_indexed 2024-03-10T22:19:55Z
format Article
id doaj.art-05c5f8ba22ef47cda36ebc1fe94a4f0c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2509-9280
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T22:19:55Z
publishDate 2023-11-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series European Radiology Experimental
spelling doaj.art-05c5f8ba22ef47cda36ebc1fe94a4f0c2023-11-19T12:19:00ZengSpringerOpenEuropean Radiology Experimental2509-92802023-11-017111410.1186/s41747-023-00385-2Denoising diffusion-based MRI to CT image translation enables automated spinal segmentationRobert Graf0Joachim Schmitt1Sarah Schlaeger2Hendrik Kristian Möller3Vasiliki Sideri-Lampretsa4Anjany Sekuboyina5Sandro Manuel Krieg6Benedikt Wiestler7Bjoern Menze8Daniel Rueckert9Jan Stefan Kirschke10Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Technical University of MunichDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Technical University of MunichDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Technical University of MunichDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Technical University of MunichInstitut Für KI Und Informatik in Der Medizin, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Technical University of MunichDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Technical University of MunichDepartment of Neurosurgery, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of MunichDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Technical University of MunichDepartment of Quantitative Biomedicine, University of ZurichInstitut Für KI Und Informatik in Der Medizin, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Technical University of MunichDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Technical University of MunichAbstract Background Automated segmentation of spinal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays a vital role both scientifically and clinically. However, accurately delineating posterior spine structures is challenging. Methods This retrospective study, approved by the ethical committee, involved translating T1-weighted and T2-weighted images into computed tomography (CT) images in a total of 263 pairs of CT/MR series. Landmark-based registration was performed to align image pairs. We compared two-dimensional (2D) paired — Pix2Pix, denoising diffusion implicit models (DDIM) image mode, DDIM noise mode — and unpaired (SynDiff, contrastive unpaired translation) image-to-image translation using “peak signal-to-noise ratio” as quality measure. A publicly available segmentation network segmented the synthesized CT datasets, and Dice similarity coefficients (DSC) were evaluated on in-house test sets and the “MRSpineSeg Challenge” volumes. The 2D findings were extended to three-dimensional (3D) Pix2Pix and DDIM. Results 2D paired methods and SynDiff exhibited similar translation performance and DCS on paired data. DDIM image mode achieved the highest image quality. SynDiff, Pix2Pix, and DDIM image mode demonstrated similar DSC (0.77). For craniocaudal axis rotations, at least two landmarks per vertebra were required for registration. The 3D translation outperformed the 2D approach, resulting in improved DSC (0.80) and anatomically accurate segmentations with higher spatial resolution than that of the original MRI series. Conclusions Two landmarks per vertebra registration enabled paired image-to-image translation from MRI to CT and outperformed all unpaired approaches. The 3D techniques provided anatomically correct segmentations, avoiding underprediction of small structures like the spinous process. Relevance statement This study addresses the unresolved issue of translating spinal MRI to CT, making CT-based tools usable for MRI data. It generates whole spine segmentation, previously unavailable in MRI, a prerequisite for biomechanical modeling and feature extraction for clinical applications. Key points • Unpaired image translation lacks in converting spine MRI to CT effectively. • Paired translation needs registration with two landmarks per vertebra at least. • Paired image-to-image enables segmentation transfer to other domains. • 3D translation enables super resolution from MRI to CT. • 3D translation prevents underprediction of small structures. Graphical Abstracthttps://doi.org/10.1186/s41747-023-00385-2Deep learningImage processing (computer assisted)Magnetic resonance imagingSpineVertebral body
spellingShingle Robert Graf
Joachim Schmitt
Sarah Schlaeger
Hendrik Kristian Möller
Vasiliki Sideri-Lampretsa
Anjany Sekuboyina
Sandro Manuel Krieg
Benedikt Wiestler
Bjoern Menze
Daniel Rueckert
Jan Stefan Kirschke
Denoising diffusion-based MRI to CT image translation enables automated spinal segmentation
European Radiology Experimental
Deep learning
Image processing (computer assisted)
Magnetic resonance imaging
Spine
Vertebral body
title Denoising diffusion-based MRI to CT image translation enables automated spinal segmentation
title_full Denoising diffusion-based MRI to CT image translation enables automated spinal segmentation
title_fullStr Denoising diffusion-based MRI to CT image translation enables automated spinal segmentation
title_full_unstemmed Denoising diffusion-based MRI to CT image translation enables automated spinal segmentation
title_short Denoising diffusion-based MRI to CT image translation enables automated spinal segmentation
title_sort denoising diffusion based mri to ct image translation enables automated spinal segmentation
topic Deep learning
Image processing (computer assisted)
Magnetic resonance imaging
Spine
Vertebral body
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s41747-023-00385-2
work_keys_str_mv AT robertgraf denoisingdiffusionbasedmritoctimagetranslationenablesautomatedspinalsegmentation
AT joachimschmitt denoisingdiffusionbasedmritoctimagetranslationenablesautomatedspinalsegmentation
AT sarahschlaeger denoisingdiffusionbasedmritoctimagetranslationenablesautomatedspinalsegmentation
AT hendrikkristianmoller denoisingdiffusionbasedmritoctimagetranslationenablesautomatedspinalsegmentation
AT vasilikisiderilampretsa denoisingdiffusionbasedmritoctimagetranslationenablesautomatedspinalsegmentation
AT anjanysekuboyina denoisingdiffusionbasedmritoctimagetranslationenablesautomatedspinalsegmentation
AT sandromanuelkrieg denoisingdiffusionbasedmritoctimagetranslationenablesautomatedspinalsegmentation
AT benediktwiestler denoisingdiffusionbasedmritoctimagetranslationenablesautomatedspinalsegmentation
AT bjoernmenze denoisingdiffusionbasedmritoctimagetranslationenablesautomatedspinalsegmentation
AT danielrueckert denoisingdiffusionbasedmritoctimagetranslationenablesautomatedspinalsegmentation
AT janstefankirschke denoisingdiffusionbasedmritoctimagetranslationenablesautomatedspinalsegmentation