“Who is really British anyway?”: A thematic analysis of responses to online hate materials

This article aims to add to the relatively small body of literature on online hatred. In particular, it focuses on the role social networking sites may play in the development of polarisation, by exploring how online users respond to explicit online hate materials. Specifically, this article discuss...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sarah Rohlfing, Stefanie Sonnenberg
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Masaryk University 2016-12-01
Series:Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberpspace
Subjects:
Online Access:https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/6275
_version_ 1827310966152364032
author Sarah Rohlfing
Stefanie Sonnenberg
author_facet Sarah Rohlfing
Stefanie Sonnenberg
author_sort Sarah Rohlfing
collection DOAJ
description This article aims to add to the relatively small body of literature on online hatred. In particular, it focuses on the role social networking sites may play in the development of polarisation, by exploring how online users respond to explicit online hate materials. Specifically, this article discusses the ways in which a self-selected sample of YouTube users responded, via posting online comments, to a video clip in which a White female train passenger (called Emma) could be seen to racially to abuse other passengers. Thematic analysis of the YouTube comments identified four main themes: (1) Making Sense of Emma, which encapsulated posters' attempts to find explanations for Emma’s behaviour; (2) Meeting Hatred with Hatred, which described posters’ attempts to oppose Emma’s racism by means of resorting to aggressive, hateful language; (3) Us versus Them, which encapsulated posters' tendencies to categorise themselves and other posters into in- and outgroups, based on their particular stance on racism; (4) Contesting Britishness, which expressed posters' attempts to articulate (and contest) what it means to be British. Whilst the current analysis provides some evidence that hateful web content can fuel aggressive and hateful responses, many of the comments analysed here emphasised common group membership, alongside people’s right to claim membership in a particular social category (i.e. Britishness). The current evidence, therefore, suggests that, at least in the specific context of this study, hateful web content may not necessarily lead to an automatic endorsement or escalation of hatred.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T20:09:30Z
format Article
id doaj.art-05db6c49e7254d479945eabe341b69bc
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1802-7962
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T20:09:30Z
publishDate 2016-12-01
publisher Masaryk University
record_format Article
series Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberpspace
spelling doaj.art-05db6c49e7254d479945eabe341b69bc2024-03-23T13:15:00ZengMasaryk UniversityCyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberpspace1802-79622016-12-0110410.5817/CP2016-4-2“Who is really British anyway?”: A thematic analysis of responses to online hate materialsSarah RohlfingStefanie SonnenbergThis article aims to add to the relatively small body of literature on online hatred. In particular, it focuses on the role social networking sites may play in the development of polarisation, by exploring how online users respond to explicit online hate materials. Specifically, this article discusses the ways in which a self-selected sample of YouTube users responded, via posting online comments, to a video clip in which a White female train passenger (called Emma) could be seen to racially to abuse other passengers. Thematic analysis of the YouTube comments identified four main themes: (1) Making Sense of Emma, which encapsulated posters' attempts to find explanations for Emma’s behaviour; (2) Meeting Hatred with Hatred, which described posters’ attempts to oppose Emma’s racism by means of resorting to aggressive, hateful language; (3) Us versus Them, which encapsulated posters' tendencies to categorise themselves and other posters into in- and outgroups, based on their particular stance on racism; (4) Contesting Britishness, which expressed posters' attempts to articulate (and contest) what it means to be British. Whilst the current analysis provides some evidence that hateful web content can fuel aggressive and hateful responses, many of the comments analysed here emphasised common group membership, alongside people’s right to claim membership in a particular social category (i.e. Britishness). The current evidence, therefore, suggests that, at least in the specific context of this study, hateful web content may not necessarily lead to an automatic endorsement or escalation of hatred.https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/6275Thematic analysisYouTubeonline hatrednational identityracism
spellingShingle Sarah Rohlfing
Stefanie Sonnenberg
“Who is really British anyway?”: A thematic analysis of responses to online hate materials
Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberpspace
Thematic analysis
YouTube
online hatred
national identity
racism
title “Who is really British anyway?”: A thematic analysis of responses to online hate materials
title_full “Who is really British anyway?”: A thematic analysis of responses to online hate materials
title_fullStr “Who is really British anyway?”: A thematic analysis of responses to online hate materials
title_full_unstemmed “Who is really British anyway?”: A thematic analysis of responses to online hate materials
title_short “Who is really British anyway?”: A thematic analysis of responses to online hate materials
title_sort who is really british anyway a thematic analysis of responses to online hate materials
topic Thematic analysis
YouTube
online hatred
national identity
racism
url https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/6275
work_keys_str_mv AT sarahrohlfing whoisreallybritishanywayathematicanalysisofresponsestoonlinehatematerials
AT stefaniesonnenberg whoisreallybritishanywayathematicanalysisofresponsestoonlinehatematerials