Predictors of Lassa fever diagnosis in suspected cases reporting to health facilities in Nigeria

Abstract Lassa fever (LF) remains endemic in Nigeria with the country reporting the highest incidence and mortality globally. Recent national data suggests increasing incidence and expanding geographic spread. Predictors of LF case positivity in Nigeria have been sparsely studied. We thus sought to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chinwe Lucia Ochu, Lorretta Ntoimo, Ikenna Onoh, Friday Okonofua, Martin Meremikwu, Sandra Mba, Akanimo Iniobong, Obinna Nwafor, Mahmood Dalhat, Cornelius Ohonsi, Chinedu Arinze, Ekpereonne Esu, Ehimario Uche Igumbor, Chioma Dan-Nwafor, Elsie Ilori, Ifedayo Adetifa
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2023-04-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-33187-y
_version_ 1797840981211480064
author Chinwe Lucia Ochu
Lorretta Ntoimo
Ikenna Onoh
Friday Okonofua
Martin Meremikwu
Sandra Mba
Akanimo Iniobong
Obinna Nwafor
Mahmood Dalhat
Cornelius Ohonsi
Chinedu Arinze
Ekpereonne Esu
Ehimario Uche Igumbor
Chioma Dan-Nwafor
Elsie Ilori
Ifedayo Adetifa
author_facet Chinwe Lucia Ochu
Lorretta Ntoimo
Ikenna Onoh
Friday Okonofua
Martin Meremikwu
Sandra Mba
Akanimo Iniobong
Obinna Nwafor
Mahmood Dalhat
Cornelius Ohonsi
Chinedu Arinze
Ekpereonne Esu
Ehimario Uche Igumbor
Chioma Dan-Nwafor
Elsie Ilori
Ifedayo Adetifa
author_sort Chinwe Lucia Ochu
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Lassa fever (LF) remains endemic in Nigeria with the country reporting the highest incidence and mortality globally. Recent national data suggests increasing incidence and expanding geographic spread. Predictors of LF case positivity in Nigeria have been sparsely studied. We thus sought to determine the sociodemographic and clinical determinants of LF positivity amongst suspected cases presenting to health facilities from 2018 to 2021. A secondary analysis of the national LF surveillance data between January 2018 and December 2021. Socio-demographic and clinical data of 20,027 suspected LF cases were analysed using frequencies and Chi-square statistics with significant p-value set at p < 0.05. The outcome variable was LF case status (positive or negative). Predictors of LF case positivity were assessed using multiple logistic regression models with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Case positivity rate (CPR) for the four years was 15.8% with higher odds of positivity among age group 40–49 years (aOR = 1.40; 95% CI 1.21–1.62), males (aOR = 1.11; 95% CI 1.03–1.20), those with formal education (aOR = 1.33; 95% CI 1.13–1.56), artisans (aOR = 1.70; 95% CI 1.28–2.27), religious leaders (aOR = 1.62; 95% CI 1.04–2.52), farmers (aOR = 1.48; 95% CI 1.21–1.81), and symptomatic individuals (aOR = 2.36; 95% CI 2.09–2.68). Being a health worker (aOR = 0.69; 95% CI 0.53–0.91), a teacher (aOR = 0.69; 95% CI 0.53–0.89) and cases reporting in the 3rd quarter (aOR = 0.79; 95% CI 0.69–0.92) had lower odds. In a sex-disaggregated analysis, female farmers had higher odds of positivity (aOR = 2.43; 95% CI 1.76–3.38; p < 0.001) than male farmers (aOR = 1.52; 95% CI 1.19–1.96; p < 0.01). Fever (aOR = 2.39; 95% CI 2.00–2.84) and gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms (aOR = 2.15; 95% CI 1.94–2.37) had the highest odds among symptoms. Combination of fever and GI symptoms (aOR = 2.15; 95% CI 1.50–3.10), fever and neurological symptoms (aOR = 6.37; 95% CI 1.49–27.16), fever and musculo-skeletal symptoms (aOR = 2.95; 95% CI 1.37–6.33), fever and cardiopulmonary symptoms (aOR = 1.81; 95% CI 1.24–2.64), and cardiopulmonary and general symptoms (aOR = 1.50; 95% CI 1.19–1.89) were also predictive. Cumulative LF CPR appears high with clearly identified predictors. Targeted interventions with heightened index of suspicion for sociodemographic categories predictive of LF in suspected cases are recommended. Ethnographic and further epidemiological studies could aid better understanding of these associations.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T16:23:31Z
format Article
id doaj.art-05e2c8f0350147d4a898208ec8a7cea8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-2322
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T16:23:31Z
publishDate 2023-04-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj.art-05e2c8f0350147d4a898208ec8a7cea82023-04-23T11:17:12ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222023-04-0113111210.1038/s41598-023-33187-yPredictors of Lassa fever diagnosis in suspected cases reporting to health facilities in NigeriaChinwe Lucia Ochu0Lorretta Ntoimo1Ikenna Onoh2Friday Okonofua3Martin Meremikwu4Sandra Mba5Akanimo Iniobong6Obinna Nwafor7Mahmood Dalhat8Cornelius Ohonsi9Chinedu Arinze10Ekpereonne Esu11Ehimario Uche Igumbor12Chioma Dan-Nwafor13Elsie Ilori14Ifedayo Adetifa15Department of Prevention Programmes and Knowledge Management, Nigeria Centre for Disease ControlDepartment of Demography and Social Statistics, Faculty of Social Sciences, Federal University Oye-EkitiDepartment of Health Emergency Preparedness and Response, Nigeria Centre for Disease ControlCentre of Excellence in Reproductive Health Innovation, University of BeninCochrane Nigeria, Institute of Tropical Diseases Research and Prevention, University of Calabar Teaching HospitalDepartment of Surveillance and Epidemiology, Nigeria Centre for Disease ControlDepartment of Health Emergency Preparedness and Response, Nigeria Centre for Disease ControlDepartment of Surveillance and Epidemiology, Nigeria Centre for Disease ControlDepartment of Prevention Programmes and Knowledge Management, Nigeria Centre for Disease ControlDepartment of Prevention Programmes and Knowledge Management, Nigeria Centre for Disease ControlDepartment of Surveillance and Epidemiology, Nigeria Centre for Disease ControlCochrane Nigeria, Institute of Tropical Diseases Research and Prevention, University of Calabar Teaching HospitalCentre for Infectious Disease Research, Nigerian Institute of Medical ResearchDepartment of Surveillance and Epidemiology, Nigeria Centre for Disease ControlDepartment of Surveillance and Epidemiology, Nigeria Centre for Disease ControlThe Office of the Director General, Nigeria Centre for Disease ControlAbstract Lassa fever (LF) remains endemic in Nigeria with the country reporting the highest incidence and mortality globally. Recent national data suggests increasing incidence and expanding geographic spread. Predictors of LF case positivity in Nigeria have been sparsely studied. We thus sought to determine the sociodemographic and clinical determinants of LF positivity amongst suspected cases presenting to health facilities from 2018 to 2021. A secondary analysis of the national LF surveillance data between January 2018 and December 2021. Socio-demographic and clinical data of 20,027 suspected LF cases were analysed using frequencies and Chi-square statistics with significant p-value set at p < 0.05. The outcome variable was LF case status (positive or negative). Predictors of LF case positivity were assessed using multiple logistic regression models with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Case positivity rate (CPR) for the four years was 15.8% with higher odds of positivity among age group 40–49 years (aOR = 1.40; 95% CI 1.21–1.62), males (aOR = 1.11; 95% CI 1.03–1.20), those with formal education (aOR = 1.33; 95% CI 1.13–1.56), artisans (aOR = 1.70; 95% CI 1.28–2.27), religious leaders (aOR = 1.62; 95% CI 1.04–2.52), farmers (aOR = 1.48; 95% CI 1.21–1.81), and symptomatic individuals (aOR = 2.36; 95% CI 2.09–2.68). Being a health worker (aOR = 0.69; 95% CI 0.53–0.91), a teacher (aOR = 0.69; 95% CI 0.53–0.89) and cases reporting in the 3rd quarter (aOR = 0.79; 95% CI 0.69–0.92) had lower odds. In a sex-disaggregated analysis, female farmers had higher odds of positivity (aOR = 2.43; 95% CI 1.76–3.38; p < 0.001) than male farmers (aOR = 1.52; 95% CI 1.19–1.96; p < 0.01). Fever (aOR = 2.39; 95% CI 2.00–2.84) and gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms (aOR = 2.15; 95% CI 1.94–2.37) had the highest odds among symptoms. Combination of fever and GI symptoms (aOR = 2.15; 95% CI 1.50–3.10), fever and neurological symptoms (aOR = 6.37; 95% CI 1.49–27.16), fever and musculo-skeletal symptoms (aOR = 2.95; 95% CI 1.37–6.33), fever and cardiopulmonary symptoms (aOR = 1.81; 95% CI 1.24–2.64), and cardiopulmonary and general symptoms (aOR = 1.50; 95% CI 1.19–1.89) were also predictive. Cumulative LF CPR appears high with clearly identified predictors. Targeted interventions with heightened index of suspicion for sociodemographic categories predictive of LF in suspected cases are recommended. Ethnographic and further epidemiological studies could aid better understanding of these associations.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-33187-y
spellingShingle Chinwe Lucia Ochu
Lorretta Ntoimo
Ikenna Onoh
Friday Okonofua
Martin Meremikwu
Sandra Mba
Akanimo Iniobong
Obinna Nwafor
Mahmood Dalhat
Cornelius Ohonsi
Chinedu Arinze
Ekpereonne Esu
Ehimario Uche Igumbor
Chioma Dan-Nwafor
Elsie Ilori
Ifedayo Adetifa
Predictors of Lassa fever diagnosis in suspected cases reporting to health facilities in Nigeria
Scientific Reports
title Predictors of Lassa fever diagnosis in suspected cases reporting to health facilities in Nigeria
title_full Predictors of Lassa fever diagnosis in suspected cases reporting to health facilities in Nigeria
title_fullStr Predictors of Lassa fever diagnosis in suspected cases reporting to health facilities in Nigeria
title_full_unstemmed Predictors of Lassa fever diagnosis in suspected cases reporting to health facilities in Nigeria
title_short Predictors of Lassa fever diagnosis in suspected cases reporting to health facilities in Nigeria
title_sort predictors of lassa fever diagnosis in suspected cases reporting to health facilities in nigeria
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-33187-y
work_keys_str_mv AT chinweluciaochu predictorsoflassafeverdiagnosisinsuspectedcasesreportingtohealthfacilitiesinnigeria
AT lorrettantoimo predictorsoflassafeverdiagnosisinsuspectedcasesreportingtohealthfacilitiesinnigeria
AT ikennaonoh predictorsoflassafeverdiagnosisinsuspectedcasesreportingtohealthfacilitiesinnigeria
AT fridayokonofua predictorsoflassafeverdiagnosisinsuspectedcasesreportingtohealthfacilitiesinnigeria
AT martinmeremikwu predictorsoflassafeverdiagnosisinsuspectedcasesreportingtohealthfacilitiesinnigeria
AT sandramba predictorsoflassafeverdiagnosisinsuspectedcasesreportingtohealthfacilitiesinnigeria
AT akanimoiniobong predictorsoflassafeverdiagnosisinsuspectedcasesreportingtohealthfacilitiesinnigeria
AT obinnanwafor predictorsoflassafeverdiagnosisinsuspectedcasesreportingtohealthfacilitiesinnigeria
AT mahmooddalhat predictorsoflassafeverdiagnosisinsuspectedcasesreportingtohealthfacilitiesinnigeria
AT corneliusohonsi predictorsoflassafeverdiagnosisinsuspectedcasesreportingtohealthfacilitiesinnigeria
AT chineduarinze predictorsoflassafeverdiagnosisinsuspectedcasesreportingtohealthfacilitiesinnigeria
AT ekpereonneesu predictorsoflassafeverdiagnosisinsuspectedcasesreportingtohealthfacilitiesinnigeria
AT ehimarioucheigumbor predictorsoflassafeverdiagnosisinsuspectedcasesreportingtohealthfacilitiesinnigeria
AT chiomadannwafor predictorsoflassafeverdiagnosisinsuspectedcasesreportingtohealthfacilitiesinnigeria
AT elsieilori predictorsoflassafeverdiagnosisinsuspectedcasesreportingtohealthfacilitiesinnigeria
AT ifedayoadetifa predictorsoflassafeverdiagnosisinsuspectedcasesreportingtohealthfacilitiesinnigeria