The new and the traditional in education: a deceptive opposition

This article presents an analysis of the “traditional” and “new” categories used to explain pedagogical, didactic and educational positions in general. It is based on the hypothesis that, under the false appearance of a debate between conservatism and progressivism, issues that merit a more complex...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Daniel Brailovsky
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Tecnológico de Antioquia Institución Universitaria 2018-12-01
Series:Senderos Pedagogicos
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ojs.tdea.edu.co/index.php/senderos/article/view/963
_version_ 1818470622771019776
author Daniel Brailovsky
author_facet Daniel Brailovsky
author_sort Daniel Brailovsky
collection DOAJ
description This article presents an analysis of the “traditional” and “new” categories used to explain pedagogical, didactic and educational positions in general. It is based on the hypothesis that, under the false appearance of a debate between conservatism and progressivism, issues that merit a more complex and profound treatment are simplified. The article proposes to recognize the heterogeneity of visions that are presented as “criticisms of traditional education”, where the liberating ideals of the newschooling of the early twentieth century coexist with other speeches set forth since the neo-liberal reforms, of efficient, neuroscientific and moralizing features.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T21:40:23Z
format Article
id doaj.art-05e5d50f11e34b088a7701f9b480d155
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2145-8243
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T21:40:23Z
publishDate 2018-12-01
publisher Tecnológico de Antioquia Institución Universitaria
record_format Article
series Senderos Pedagogicos
spelling doaj.art-05e5d50f11e34b088a7701f9b480d1552022-12-22T02:28:47ZengTecnológico de Antioquia Institución UniversitariaSenderos Pedagogicos2145-82432018-12-0199161178https://doi.org/10.53995/sp.v9i9.963The new and the traditional in education: a deceptive oppositionDaniel Brailovsky0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1995-9401Universidad Pedagógica NacionalThis article presents an analysis of the “traditional” and “new” categories used to explain pedagogical, didactic and educational positions in general. It is based on the hypothesis that, under the false appearance of a debate between conservatism and progressivism, issues that merit a more complex and profound treatment are simplified. The article proposes to recognize the heterogeneity of visions that are presented as “criticisms of traditional education”, where the liberating ideals of the newschooling of the early twentieth century coexist with other speeches set forth since the neo-liberal reforms, of efficient, neuroscientific and moralizing features.https://ojs.tdea.edu.co/index.php/senderos/article/view/963 educationemotional educationnew-schoolingtraditional schoolnew schoolneuropedagogypedagogy
spellingShingle Daniel Brailovsky
The new and the traditional in education: a deceptive opposition
Senderos Pedagogicos
education
emotional education
new-schooling
traditional school
new school
neuropedagogy
pedagogy
title The new and the traditional in education: a deceptive opposition
title_full The new and the traditional in education: a deceptive opposition
title_fullStr The new and the traditional in education: a deceptive opposition
title_full_unstemmed The new and the traditional in education: a deceptive opposition
title_short The new and the traditional in education: a deceptive opposition
title_sort new and the traditional in education a deceptive opposition
topic education
emotional education
new-schooling
traditional school
new school
neuropedagogy
pedagogy
url https://ojs.tdea.edu.co/index.php/senderos/article/view/963
work_keys_str_mv AT danielbrailovsky thenewandthetraditionalineducationadeceptiveopposition
AT danielbrailovsky newandthetraditionalineducationadeceptiveopposition