Biomechanics & Sports Medicine

Problem: The technology of inertial measurement units (IMU) enables the collection of running biomechanical data under in-field conditions. This paper presents a validation study of an increasingly used IMU system using a corresponding below-ground magnetic timing gate system.Methods: Thirty active...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Machulik C, Hamacher D, Lindlein K, 3, Zech A, Hollander K, 4
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Dynamic Media Sales Verlag 2020-03-01
Series:Deutsche Zeitschrift für Sportmedizin
Online Access:https://www.germanjournalsportsmedicine.com/archive/archive-2020/issue-3/validation-of-an-inertial-measurement-unit-based-magnetic-timing-gate-system-during-running-and-sprinting/
_version_ 1797787649245708288
author Machulik C
Hamacher D
Lindlein K
3
Zech A
Hollander K
4
author_facet Machulik C
Hamacher D
Lindlein K
3
Zech A
Hollander K
4
author_sort Machulik C
collection DOAJ
description Problem: The technology of inertial measurement units (IMU) enables the collection of running biomechanical data under in-field conditions. This paper presents a validation study of an increasingly used IMU system using a corresponding below-ground magnetic timing gate system.Methods: Thirty active healthy participants ran with an IMU located at the lumbar spine on a 60 m-section of a 400 m tartantrack. The IMUs were connected with magnetic timing gates installed below the tartan track. A photoelectric cell reference system was used for comparative analysis. Outcome measures were running speed, step length and cadence during running at slow and fast velocity. Intra-Class-Correlation (ICC), Bland-Altman analysis and regression-based Bland-Altman analysis were used to determine measurement agreement. Results: The analysis showed high measurement agreement for running speed, step length and cadence for both velocities (ICCs 0.745-0.996). Bland-Altman analysis showed high random errors and increased systematic and random errors for step length and cadence atfast running velocities. Regression-based Bland-Altman analysis indicated a systematic increase of bias (systematic error) with higher step length values.Discussion: Despite a high measurement agreement expressed by ICCs, study results also showed high error values for absolute measurements expressed by systematic and random errors for all parameters. Therefore, attention should be given to thecomparability of both measurement systems. Further research should focus on details of step length calculations as well as reliability and validity underlonger running conditions. KEY WORDS: IMU, Running, Cadence, Step Length, Biomechanics
first_indexed 2024-03-13T01:24:52Z
format Article
id doaj.art-05e7f97c3ea8442081b84449aee109b8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0344-5925
2510-5264
language deu
last_indexed 2024-03-13T01:24:52Z
publishDate 2020-03-01
publisher Dynamic Media Sales Verlag
record_format Article
series Deutsche Zeitschrift für Sportmedizin
spelling doaj.art-05e7f97c3ea8442081b84449aee109b82023-07-04T17:04:29ZdeuDynamic Media Sales VerlagDeutsche Zeitschrift für Sportmedizin0344-59252510-52642020-03-0171310.5960/dzsm.2020.426308012Biomechanics & Sports MedicineMachulik CHamacher DLindlein K3Zech AHollander K4Problem: The technology of inertial measurement units (IMU) enables the collection of running biomechanical data under in-field conditions. This paper presents a validation study of an increasingly used IMU system using a corresponding below-ground magnetic timing gate system.Methods: Thirty active healthy participants ran with an IMU located at the lumbar spine on a 60 m-section of a 400 m tartantrack. The IMUs were connected with magnetic timing gates installed below the tartan track. A photoelectric cell reference system was used for comparative analysis. Outcome measures were running speed, step length and cadence during running at slow and fast velocity. Intra-Class-Correlation (ICC), Bland-Altman analysis and regression-based Bland-Altman analysis were used to determine measurement agreement. Results: The analysis showed high measurement agreement for running speed, step length and cadence for both velocities (ICCs 0.745-0.996). Bland-Altman analysis showed high random errors and increased systematic and random errors for step length and cadence atfast running velocities. Regression-based Bland-Altman analysis indicated a systematic increase of bias (systematic error) with higher step length values.Discussion: Despite a high measurement agreement expressed by ICCs, study results also showed high error values for absolute measurements expressed by systematic and random errors for all parameters. Therefore, attention should be given to thecomparability of both measurement systems. Further research should focus on details of step length calculations as well as reliability and validity underlonger running conditions. KEY WORDS: IMU, Running, Cadence, Step Length, Biomechanicshttps://www.germanjournalsportsmedicine.com/archive/archive-2020/issue-3/validation-of-an-inertial-measurement-unit-based-magnetic-timing-gate-system-during-running-and-sprinting/
spellingShingle Machulik C
Hamacher D
Lindlein K
3
Zech A
Hollander K
4
Biomechanics & Sports Medicine
Deutsche Zeitschrift für Sportmedizin
title Biomechanics & Sports Medicine
title_full Biomechanics & Sports Medicine
title_fullStr Biomechanics & Sports Medicine
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanics & Sports Medicine
title_short Biomechanics & Sports Medicine
title_sort biomechanics amp sports medicine
url https://www.germanjournalsportsmedicine.com/archive/archive-2020/issue-3/validation-of-an-inertial-measurement-unit-based-magnetic-timing-gate-system-during-running-and-sprinting/
work_keys_str_mv AT machulikc biomechanicsampsportsmedicine
AT hamacherd biomechanicsampsportsmedicine
AT lindleink biomechanicsampsportsmedicine
AT 3 biomechanicsampsportsmedicine
AT zecha biomechanicsampsportsmedicine
AT hollanderk biomechanicsampsportsmedicine
AT 4 biomechanicsampsportsmedicine