Horizontal Ridge Augmentation: A Comparison between Khoury and Urban Technique
Purpose. The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate and compare the clinical efficacy of horizontal alveolar ridge augmentation techniques described by Khoury and Urban. Methods. A systematic electronic search in the MEDLINE databases, SCOPUS, WOS, and the Cochrane Central Register of C...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-08-01
|
| Series: | Biology |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2079-7737/10/8/749 |
| _version_ | 1827685831213580288 |
|---|---|
| author | Javier Sánchez-Sánchez Finn Niclas Pickert Luis Sánchez-Labrador Francisco GF Tresguerres José María Martínez-González Cristina Meniz-García |
| author_facet | Javier Sánchez-Sánchez Finn Niclas Pickert Luis Sánchez-Labrador Francisco GF Tresguerres José María Martínez-González Cristina Meniz-García |
| author_sort | Javier Sánchez-Sánchez |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Purpose. The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate and compare the clinical efficacy of horizontal alveolar ridge augmentation techniques described by Khoury and Urban. Methods. A systematic electronic search in the MEDLINE databases, SCOPUS, WOS, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) as well as a manual search, were conducted independently by two reviewers up to July 2021. Results. Six studies met the pre-established inclusion criteria and were included in the descriptive analysis. Due to the heterogeneity found across the included studies, meta-analysis could not be performed. Horizontal bone gain was between 3.93 ± 0.9 mm and 5.02 ± 0.8 mm with the Khoury technique and between 3.9 ± 0.9 mm and 5.68 ± 1.42 mm with the Urban technique. Similar complication rates were reported in both groups: infection (7%), in the Khoury technique, and membrane exposure (3.2–13.6%), in the Urban technique, being the most frequent events. Conclusions. Both techniques were found to be effective, in terms of clinical bone gain, for horizontal alveolar ridge gain. Nevertheless, available literature is limited, and there is a lack of comparative studies to better evaluate the results. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-10T09:00:00Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-05eac9eb8f374b22a2f83bd9bd53dec0 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2079-7737 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-10T09:00:00Z |
| publishDate | 2021-08-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Biology |
| spelling | doaj.art-05eac9eb8f374b22a2f83bd9bd53dec02023-11-22T06:49:58ZengMDPI AGBiology2079-77372021-08-0110874910.3390/biology10080749Horizontal Ridge Augmentation: A Comparison between Khoury and Urban TechniqueJavier Sánchez-Sánchez0Finn Niclas Pickert1Luis Sánchez-Labrador2Francisco GF Tresguerres3José María Martínez-González4Cristina Meniz-García5Department of Dental Clinical Specialties, Faculty of Dentistry, Complutense University of Madrid, 28040 Madrid, SpainDepartment of Dental Clinical Specialties, Faculty of Dentistry, Complutense University of Madrid, 28040 Madrid, SpainDepartment of Dental Clinical Specialties, Faculty of Dentistry, Complutense University of Madrid, 28040 Madrid, SpainDepartment of Dental Clinical Specialties, Faculty of Dentistry, Complutense University of Madrid, 28040 Madrid, SpainDepartment of Dental Clinical Specialties, Faculty of Dentistry, Complutense University of Madrid, 28040 Madrid, SpainDepartment of Dental Clinical Specialties, Faculty of Dentistry, Complutense University of Madrid, 28040 Madrid, SpainPurpose. The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate and compare the clinical efficacy of horizontal alveolar ridge augmentation techniques described by Khoury and Urban. Methods. A systematic electronic search in the MEDLINE databases, SCOPUS, WOS, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) as well as a manual search, were conducted independently by two reviewers up to July 2021. Results. Six studies met the pre-established inclusion criteria and were included in the descriptive analysis. Due to the heterogeneity found across the included studies, meta-analysis could not be performed. Horizontal bone gain was between 3.93 ± 0.9 mm and 5.02 ± 0.8 mm with the Khoury technique and between 3.9 ± 0.9 mm and 5.68 ± 1.42 mm with the Urban technique. Similar complication rates were reported in both groups: infection (7%), in the Khoury technique, and membrane exposure (3.2–13.6%), in the Urban technique, being the most frequent events. Conclusions. Both techniques were found to be effective, in terms of clinical bone gain, for horizontal alveolar ridge gain. Nevertheless, available literature is limited, and there is a lack of comparative studies to better evaluate the results.https://www.mdpi.com/2079-7737/10/8/749dental implantsguided bone regenerationhorizontal bone augmentationbone graft |
| spellingShingle | Javier Sánchez-Sánchez Finn Niclas Pickert Luis Sánchez-Labrador Francisco GF Tresguerres José María Martínez-González Cristina Meniz-García Horizontal Ridge Augmentation: A Comparison between Khoury and Urban Technique Biology dental implants guided bone regeneration horizontal bone augmentation bone graft |
| title | Horizontal Ridge Augmentation: A Comparison between Khoury and Urban Technique |
| title_full | Horizontal Ridge Augmentation: A Comparison between Khoury and Urban Technique |
| title_fullStr | Horizontal Ridge Augmentation: A Comparison between Khoury and Urban Technique |
| title_full_unstemmed | Horizontal Ridge Augmentation: A Comparison between Khoury and Urban Technique |
| title_short | Horizontal Ridge Augmentation: A Comparison between Khoury and Urban Technique |
| title_sort | horizontal ridge augmentation a comparison between khoury and urban technique |
| topic | dental implants guided bone regeneration horizontal bone augmentation bone graft |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/2079-7737/10/8/749 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT javiersanchezsanchez horizontalridgeaugmentationacomparisonbetweenkhouryandurbantechnique AT finnniclaspickert horizontalridgeaugmentationacomparisonbetweenkhouryandurbantechnique AT luissanchezlabrador horizontalridgeaugmentationacomparisonbetweenkhouryandurbantechnique AT franciscogftresguerres horizontalridgeaugmentationacomparisonbetweenkhouryandurbantechnique AT josemariamartinezgonzalez horizontalridgeaugmentationacomparisonbetweenkhouryandurbantechnique AT cristinamenizgarcia horizontalridgeaugmentationacomparisonbetweenkhouryandurbantechnique |