Cretaceous tectonic evolution of the Neo-Tethys in Central Iran: Evidence from petrology and age of the Nain-Ashin ophiolitic basalts

The Nain and Ashin ophiolites consist of Mesozoic mélange units that were emplaced in the Late Cretaceous onto the continental basement of the Central-East Iran microcontinent (CEIM). They largely consist of serpentinized peridotites slices; nonetheless, minor tectonic slices of sheeted dykes and pi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tahmineh Pirnia, Emilio Saccani, Ghodrat Torabi, Marco Chiari, Špela Goričan, Edoardo Barbero
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2020-01-01
Series:Geoscience Frontiers
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674987119300647
_version_ 1797721471517196288
author Tahmineh Pirnia
Emilio Saccani
Ghodrat Torabi
Marco Chiari
Špela Goričan
Edoardo Barbero
author_facet Tahmineh Pirnia
Emilio Saccani
Ghodrat Torabi
Marco Chiari
Špela Goričan
Edoardo Barbero
author_sort Tahmineh Pirnia
collection DOAJ
description The Nain and Ashin ophiolites consist of Mesozoic mélange units that were emplaced in the Late Cretaceous onto the continental basement of the Central-East Iran microcontinent (CEIM). They largely consist of serpentinized peridotites slices; nonetheless, minor tectonic slices of sheeted dykes and pillow lavas - locally stratigraphically associated with radiolarian cherts - can be found in these ophiolitic mélanges. Based on their whole rock geochemistry and mineral chemistry, these rocks can be divided into two geochemical groups. The sheeted dykes and most of the pillow lavas show island arc tholeiitic (IAT) affinity, whereas a few pillow lavas from the Nain ophiolites show calc-alkaline (CA) affinity. Petrogenetic modeling based on trace elements composition indicates that both IAT and CA rocks derived from partial melting of depleted mantle sources that underwent enrichment in subduction-derived components prior to melting. Petrogenetic modeling shows that these components were represented by pure aqueous fluids, or sediment melts, or a combination of both, suggesting that the studied rocks were formed in an arc-forearc tectonic setting. Our new biostratigraphic data indicate this arc-forearc setting was active in the Early Cretaceous. Previous tectonic interpretations suggested that the Nain ophiolites formed, in a Late Cretaceous backarc basin located in the south of the CEIM (the so-called Nain-Baft basin). However, recent studies showed that the CEIM underwent a counter-clockwise rotation in the Cenozoic, which displaced the Nain and Ashin ophiolites in their present day position from an original northeastward location. This evidence combined with our new data and a comparison of the chemical features of volcanic rocks from different ophiolites around the CEIM allow us to suggest that the Nain-Ashin volcanic rocks and dykes were formed in a volcanic arc that developed on the northern margin of the CEIM during the Early Cretaceous in association with the subduction, below the CEIM, of a Neo-Tethys oceanic branch that was existing between the CEIM and the southern margin of Eurasia. As a major conclusion of this paper, a new geodynamic model for the Cretaceous evolution of the CEIM and surrounding Neo-Tethyan oceanic basins is proposed. Keywords: Ophiolite, Volcanic arc, Early Cretaceous, Nain, Ashin, Iran
first_indexed 2024-03-12T09:34:44Z
format Article
id doaj.art-05fb5e482feb4a3a8a635cf16e12e776
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1674-9871
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T09:34:44Z
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Geoscience Frontiers
spelling doaj.art-05fb5e482feb4a3a8a635cf16e12e7762023-09-02T13:45:48ZengElsevierGeoscience Frontiers1674-98712020-01-011115781Cretaceous tectonic evolution of the Neo-Tethys in Central Iran: Evidence from petrology and age of the Nain-Ashin ophiolitic basaltsTahmineh Pirnia0Emilio Saccani1Ghodrat Torabi2Marco Chiari3Špela Goričan4Edoardo Barbero5Department of Physics and Earth Sciences, Ferrara University, Ferrara, 44122, Italy; Corresponding author.Department of Physics and Earth Sciences, Ferrara University, Ferrara, 44122, ItalyDepartment of Geology, Faculty of Science, University of Isfahan, IranCNR, Istituto di Geoscienze e Georisorse, Florence, ItalyPaleontološki inštitut Ivana Rakovca ZRC SAZU, Ljubljana, SloveniaDepartment of Physics and Earth Sciences, Ferrara University, Ferrara, 44122, ItalyThe Nain and Ashin ophiolites consist of Mesozoic mélange units that were emplaced in the Late Cretaceous onto the continental basement of the Central-East Iran microcontinent (CEIM). They largely consist of serpentinized peridotites slices; nonetheless, minor tectonic slices of sheeted dykes and pillow lavas - locally stratigraphically associated with radiolarian cherts - can be found in these ophiolitic mélanges. Based on their whole rock geochemistry and mineral chemistry, these rocks can be divided into two geochemical groups. The sheeted dykes and most of the pillow lavas show island arc tholeiitic (IAT) affinity, whereas a few pillow lavas from the Nain ophiolites show calc-alkaline (CA) affinity. Petrogenetic modeling based on trace elements composition indicates that both IAT and CA rocks derived from partial melting of depleted mantle sources that underwent enrichment in subduction-derived components prior to melting. Petrogenetic modeling shows that these components were represented by pure aqueous fluids, or sediment melts, or a combination of both, suggesting that the studied rocks were formed in an arc-forearc tectonic setting. Our new biostratigraphic data indicate this arc-forearc setting was active in the Early Cretaceous. Previous tectonic interpretations suggested that the Nain ophiolites formed, in a Late Cretaceous backarc basin located in the south of the CEIM (the so-called Nain-Baft basin). However, recent studies showed that the CEIM underwent a counter-clockwise rotation in the Cenozoic, which displaced the Nain and Ashin ophiolites in their present day position from an original northeastward location. This evidence combined with our new data and a comparison of the chemical features of volcanic rocks from different ophiolites around the CEIM allow us to suggest that the Nain-Ashin volcanic rocks and dykes were formed in a volcanic arc that developed on the northern margin of the CEIM during the Early Cretaceous in association with the subduction, below the CEIM, of a Neo-Tethys oceanic branch that was existing between the CEIM and the southern margin of Eurasia. As a major conclusion of this paper, a new geodynamic model for the Cretaceous evolution of the CEIM and surrounding Neo-Tethyan oceanic basins is proposed. Keywords: Ophiolite, Volcanic arc, Early Cretaceous, Nain, Ashin, Iranhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674987119300647
spellingShingle Tahmineh Pirnia
Emilio Saccani
Ghodrat Torabi
Marco Chiari
Špela Goričan
Edoardo Barbero
Cretaceous tectonic evolution of the Neo-Tethys in Central Iran: Evidence from petrology and age of the Nain-Ashin ophiolitic basalts
Geoscience Frontiers
title Cretaceous tectonic evolution of the Neo-Tethys in Central Iran: Evidence from petrology and age of the Nain-Ashin ophiolitic basalts
title_full Cretaceous tectonic evolution of the Neo-Tethys in Central Iran: Evidence from petrology and age of the Nain-Ashin ophiolitic basalts
title_fullStr Cretaceous tectonic evolution of the Neo-Tethys in Central Iran: Evidence from petrology and age of the Nain-Ashin ophiolitic basalts
title_full_unstemmed Cretaceous tectonic evolution of the Neo-Tethys in Central Iran: Evidence from petrology and age of the Nain-Ashin ophiolitic basalts
title_short Cretaceous tectonic evolution of the Neo-Tethys in Central Iran: Evidence from petrology and age of the Nain-Ashin ophiolitic basalts
title_sort cretaceous tectonic evolution of the neo tethys in central iran evidence from petrology and age of the nain ashin ophiolitic basalts
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674987119300647
work_keys_str_mv AT tahminehpirnia cretaceoustectonicevolutionoftheneotethysincentraliranevidencefrompetrologyandageofthenainashinophioliticbasalts
AT emiliosaccani cretaceoustectonicevolutionoftheneotethysincentraliranevidencefrompetrologyandageofthenainashinophioliticbasalts
AT ghodrattorabi cretaceoustectonicevolutionoftheneotethysincentraliranevidencefrompetrologyandageofthenainashinophioliticbasalts
AT marcochiari cretaceoustectonicevolutionoftheneotethysincentraliranevidencefrompetrologyandageofthenainashinophioliticbasalts
AT spelagorican cretaceoustectonicevolutionoftheneotethysincentraliranevidencefrompetrologyandageofthenainashinophioliticbasalts
AT edoardobarbero cretaceoustectonicevolutionoftheneotethysincentraliranevidencefrompetrologyandageofthenainashinophioliticbasalts