Fat Quantification Imaging and Biophysical Modeling for Patient-Specific Forecasting of Microwave Ablation Therapy

Computational tools are beginning to enable patient-specific surgical planning to localize and prescribe thermal dosing for liver cancer ablation therapy. Tissue-specific factors (e.g., tissue perfusion, material properties, disease state, etc.) have been found to affect ablative therapies, but curr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Frankangel Servin, Jarrod A. Collins, Jon S. Heiselman, Katherine C. Frederick-Dyer, Virginia B. Planz, Sunil K. Geevarghese, Daniel B. Brown, Michael I. Miga
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-02-01
Series:Frontiers in Physiology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphys.2021.820251/full
_version_ 1798022550989570048
author Frankangel Servin
Frankangel Servin
Jarrod A. Collins
Jon S. Heiselman
Jon S. Heiselman
Katherine C. Frederick-Dyer
Virginia B. Planz
Sunil K. Geevarghese
Daniel B. Brown
Michael I. Miga
Michael I. Miga
Michael I. Miga
Michael I. Miga
Michael I. Miga
author_facet Frankangel Servin
Frankangel Servin
Jarrod A. Collins
Jon S. Heiselman
Jon S. Heiselman
Katherine C. Frederick-Dyer
Virginia B. Planz
Sunil K. Geevarghese
Daniel B. Brown
Michael I. Miga
Michael I. Miga
Michael I. Miga
Michael I. Miga
Michael I. Miga
author_sort Frankangel Servin
collection DOAJ
description Computational tools are beginning to enable patient-specific surgical planning to localize and prescribe thermal dosing for liver cancer ablation therapy. Tissue-specific factors (e.g., tissue perfusion, material properties, disease state, etc.) have been found to affect ablative therapies, but current thermal dosing guidance practices do not account for these differences. Computational modeling of ablation procedures can integrate these sources of patient specificity to guide therapy planning and delivery. This paper establishes an imaging-data-driven framework for patient-specific biophysical modeling to predict ablation extents in livers with varying fat content in the context of microwave ablation (MWA) therapy. Patient anatomic scans were segmented to develop customized three-dimensional computational biophysical models and mDIXON fat-quantification images were acquired and analyzed to establish fat content and determine biophysical properties. Simulated patient-specific microwave ablations of tumor and healthy tissue were performed at four levels of fatty liver disease. Ablation models with greater fat content demonstrated significantly larger treatment volumes compared to livers with less severe disease states. More specifically, the results indicated an eightfold larger difference in necrotic volumes with fatty livers vs. the effects from the presence of more conductive tumor tissue. Additionally, the evolution of necrotic volume formation as a function of the thermal dose was influenced by the presence of a tumor. Fat quantification imaging showed multi-valued spatially heterogeneous distributions of fat deposition, even within their respective disease classifications (e.g., low, mild, moderate, high-fat). Altogether, the results suggest that clinical fatty liver disease levels can affect MWA, and that fat-quantitative imaging data may improve patient specificity for this treatment modality.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T17:31:52Z
format Article
id doaj.art-060201e529ce438082dcf3eb43cd00a3
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-042X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T17:31:52Z
publishDate 2022-02-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Physiology
spelling doaj.art-060201e529ce438082dcf3eb43cd00a32022-12-22T04:11:59ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Physiology1664-042X2022-02-011210.3389/fphys.2021.820251820251Fat Quantification Imaging and Biophysical Modeling for Patient-Specific Forecasting of Microwave Ablation TherapyFrankangel Servin0Frankangel Servin1Jarrod A. Collins2Jon S. Heiselman3Jon S. Heiselman4Katherine C. Frederick-Dyer5Virginia B. Planz6Sunil K. Geevarghese7Daniel B. Brown8Michael I. Miga9Michael I. Miga10Michael I. Miga11Michael I. Miga12Michael I. Miga13Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United StatesVanderbilt Institute for Surgery and Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United StatesDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United StatesDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United StatesVanderbilt Institute for Surgery and Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United StatesDepartment of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United StatesDepartment of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United StatesDepartment of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United StatesDepartment of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United StatesDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United StatesVanderbilt Institute for Surgery and Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United StatesDepartment of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United StatesDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United StatesDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United StatesComputational tools are beginning to enable patient-specific surgical planning to localize and prescribe thermal dosing for liver cancer ablation therapy. Tissue-specific factors (e.g., tissue perfusion, material properties, disease state, etc.) have been found to affect ablative therapies, but current thermal dosing guidance practices do not account for these differences. Computational modeling of ablation procedures can integrate these sources of patient specificity to guide therapy planning and delivery. This paper establishes an imaging-data-driven framework for patient-specific biophysical modeling to predict ablation extents in livers with varying fat content in the context of microwave ablation (MWA) therapy. Patient anatomic scans were segmented to develop customized three-dimensional computational biophysical models and mDIXON fat-quantification images were acquired and analyzed to establish fat content and determine biophysical properties. Simulated patient-specific microwave ablations of tumor and healthy tissue were performed at four levels of fatty liver disease. Ablation models with greater fat content demonstrated significantly larger treatment volumes compared to livers with less severe disease states. More specifically, the results indicated an eightfold larger difference in necrotic volumes with fatty livers vs. the effects from the presence of more conductive tumor tissue. Additionally, the evolution of necrotic volume formation as a function of the thermal dose was influenced by the presence of a tumor. Fat quantification imaging showed multi-valued spatially heterogeneous distributions of fat deposition, even within their respective disease classifications (e.g., low, mild, moderate, high-fat). Altogether, the results suggest that clinical fatty liver disease levels can affect MWA, and that fat-quantitative imaging data may improve patient specificity for this treatment modality.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphys.2021.820251/fullliverhepatocellular carcinomafatty liver diseasemicrowave ablationfinite elementcomputational model
spellingShingle Frankangel Servin
Frankangel Servin
Jarrod A. Collins
Jon S. Heiselman
Jon S. Heiselman
Katherine C. Frederick-Dyer
Virginia B. Planz
Sunil K. Geevarghese
Daniel B. Brown
Michael I. Miga
Michael I. Miga
Michael I. Miga
Michael I. Miga
Michael I. Miga
Fat Quantification Imaging and Biophysical Modeling for Patient-Specific Forecasting of Microwave Ablation Therapy
Frontiers in Physiology
liver
hepatocellular carcinoma
fatty liver disease
microwave ablation
finite element
computational model
title Fat Quantification Imaging and Biophysical Modeling for Patient-Specific Forecasting of Microwave Ablation Therapy
title_full Fat Quantification Imaging and Biophysical Modeling for Patient-Specific Forecasting of Microwave Ablation Therapy
title_fullStr Fat Quantification Imaging and Biophysical Modeling for Patient-Specific Forecasting of Microwave Ablation Therapy
title_full_unstemmed Fat Quantification Imaging and Biophysical Modeling for Patient-Specific Forecasting of Microwave Ablation Therapy
title_short Fat Quantification Imaging and Biophysical Modeling for Patient-Specific Forecasting of Microwave Ablation Therapy
title_sort fat quantification imaging and biophysical modeling for patient specific forecasting of microwave ablation therapy
topic liver
hepatocellular carcinoma
fatty liver disease
microwave ablation
finite element
computational model
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphys.2021.820251/full
work_keys_str_mv AT frankangelservin fatquantificationimagingandbiophysicalmodelingforpatientspecificforecastingofmicrowaveablationtherapy
AT frankangelservin fatquantificationimagingandbiophysicalmodelingforpatientspecificforecastingofmicrowaveablationtherapy
AT jarrodacollins fatquantificationimagingandbiophysicalmodelingforpatientspecificforecastingofmicrowaveablationtherapy
AT jonsheiselman fatquantificationimagingandbiophysicalmodelingforpatientspecificforecastingofmicrowaveablationtherapy
AT jonsheiselman fatquantificationimagingandbiophysicalmodelingforpatientspecificforecastingofmicrowaveablationtherapy
AT katherinecfrederickdyer fatquantificationimagingandbiophysicalmodelingforpatientspecificforecastingofmicrowaveablationtherapy
AT virginiabplanz fatquantificationimagingandbiophysicalmodelingforpatientspecificforecastingofmicrowaveablationtherapy
AT sunilkgeevarghese fatquantificationimagingandbiophysicalmodelingforpatientspecificforecastingofmicrowaveablationtherapy
AT danielbbrown fatquantificationimagingandbiophysicalmodelingforpatientspecificforecastingofmicrowaveablationtherapy
AT michaelimiga fatquantificationimagingandbiophysicalmodelingforpatientspecificforecastingofmicrowaveablationtherapy
AT michaelimiga fatquantificationimagingandbiophysicalmodelingforpatientspecificforecastingofmicrowaveablationtherapy
AT michaelimiga fatquantificationimagingandbiophysicalmodelingforpatientspecificforecastingofmicrowaveablationtherapy
AT michaelimiga fatquantificationimagingandbiophysicalmodelingforpatientspecificforecastingofmicrowaveablationtherapy
AT michaelimiga fatquantificationimagingandbiophysicalmodelingforpatientspecificforecastingofmicrowaveablationtherapy