Heuristic bias in stem cell biology

Abstract When studying purified hematopoietic stem cells, the urge for mechanisms and reductionist approaches appears to be overwhelming. The prime focus of the field has recently been on the study of highly purified hematopoietic stem cells using various lineage and stem cell-specific markers, all...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Peter Quesenberry, Theo Borgovan, Chibuikem Nwizu, Mark Dooner, Laura Goldberg
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-08-01
Series:Stem Cell Research & Therapy
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13287-019-1355-1
_version_ 1828751577186304000
author Peter Quesenberry
Theo Borgovan
Chibuikem Nwizu
Mark Dooner
Laura Goldberg
author_facet Peter Quesenberry
Theo Borgovan
Chibuikem Nwizu
Mark Dooner
Laura Goldberg
author_sort Peter Quesenberry
collection DOAJ
description Abstract When studying purified hematopoietic stem cells, the urge for mechanisms and reductionist approaches appears to be overwhelming. The prime focus of the field has recently been on the study of highly purified hematopoietic stem cells using various lineage and stem cell-specific markers, all of which adequately and conveniently fit the established hierarchical stem cell model. This methodology is tainted with bias and has led to incomplete conclusions. Much of our own work has shown that the purified hematopoietic stem cell, which has been so heavily studied, is not representative of the total population of hematopoietic stem cells and that rather than functioning within a hierarchical model of expansion the true hematopoietic stem cell is one that is actively cycling through various differentiation potentials within a dynamic continuum. Additional work with increased emphasis on studying whole populations and direct mechanistic studies to these populations is needed. Furthermore, the most productive studies may well be mechanistic at the cellular or tissue levels. Lastly, the application of robust machine learning algorithms may provide insight into the dynamic variability and flux of stem cell fate and differentiation potential.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T20:55:26Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0606ab1abc9140769fd4ca5e1ddf54f9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1757-6512
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T20:55:26Z
publishDate 2019-08-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Stem Cell Research & Therapy
spelling doaj.art-0606ab1abc9140769fd4ca5e1ddf54f92022-12-22T01:33:58ZengBMCStem Cell Research & Therapy1757-65122019-08-011011310.1186/s13287-019-1355-1Heuristic bias in stem cell biologyPeter Quesenberry0Theo Borgovan1Chibuikem Nwizu2Mark Dooner3Laura Goldberg4Division of Hematology and Oncology, Rhode Island Hospital, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown UniversityDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Rhode Island Hospital, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown UniversityDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Rhode Island Hospital, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown UniversityDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Rhode Island Hospital, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown UniversityDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Rhode Island Hospital, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown UniversityAbstract When studying purified hematopoietic stem cells, the urge for mechanisms and reductionist approaches appears to be overwhelming. The prime focus of the field has recently been on the study of highly purified hematopoietic stem cells using various lineage and stem cell-specific markers, all of which adequately and conveniently fit the established hierarchical stem cell model. This methodology is tainted with bias and has led to incomplete conclusions. Much of our own work has shown that the purified hematopoietic stem cell, which has been so heavily studied, is not representative of the total population of hematopoietic stem cells and that rather than functioning within a hierarchical model of expansion the true hematopoietic stem cell is one that is actively cycling through various differentiation potentials within a dynamic continuum. Additional work with increased emphasis on studying whole populations and direct mechanistic studies to these populations is needed. Furthermore, the most productive studies may well be mechanistic at the cellular or tissue levels. Lastly, the application of robust machine learning algorithms may provide insight into the dynamic variability and flux of stem cell fate and differentiation potential.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13287-019-1355-1Stem cell hierarchyStem cell continuumRepresentative heuristicsAvailability heuristicsHeuristic bias
spellingShingle Peter Quesenberry
Theo Borgovan
Chibuikem Nwizu
Mark Dooner
Laura Goldberg
Heuristic bias in stem cell biology
Stem Cell Research & Therapy
Stem cell hierarchy
Stem cell continuum
Representative heuristics
Availability heuristics
Heuristic bias
title Heuristic bias in stem cell biology
title_full Heuristic bias in stem cell biology
title_fullStr Heuristic bias in stem cell biology
title_full_unstemmed Heuristic bias in stem cell biology
title_short Heuristic bias in stem cell biology
title_sort heuristic bias in stem cell biology
topic Stem cell hierarchy
Stem cell continuum
Representative heuristics
Availability heuristics
Heuristic bias
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13287-019-1355-1
work_keys_str_mv AT peterquesenberry heuristicbiasinstemcellbiology
AT theoborgovan heuristicbiasinstemcellbiology
AT chibuikemnwizu heuristicbiasinstemcellbiology
AT markdooner heuristicbiasinstemcellbiology
AT lauragoldberg heuristicbiasinstemcellbiology