Coupled Antibacterial Effects of Plasma-Activated Water and Pulsed Electric Field

In the biomedical applications of cold plasma, the dominant biological effect is most typically attributed to the reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (RONS), while the physical effect of electric fields is sometimes overlooked. Here, we investigated the antibacterial effect of RONS in plasma-activa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Robin Mentheour, Zdenko Machala
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-07-01
Series:Frontiers in Physics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphy.2022.895813/full
_version_ 1811295569478418432
author Robin Mentheour
Zdenko Machala
author_facet Robin Mentheour
Zdenko Machala
author_sort Robin Mentheour
collection DOAJ
description In the biomedical applications of cold plasma, the dominant biological effect is most typically attributed to the reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (RONS), while the physical effect of electric fields is sometimes overlooked. Here, we investigated the antibacterial effect of RONS in plasma-activated water (PAW) on the inactivation of E. coli bacteria, coupled with a mild 200-nanosecond pulsed electric field (PEF) treatment. By using transient spark discharge plasma in open atmospheric air and closed air reactors, and by adding hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) into the PAW, different chemical compositions of RONS were obtained. We measured the time evolution of the concentrations of key species in the PAW post-discharge: nitrites (NO2−) and H2O2. PAW rich in both NO2− and H2O2 showed an antibacterial effect, which was enhanced by the PEF, whereas PAW rich in NO2− and poor in H2O2 showed an enhancement of the antibacterial effect by the PEF only when H2O2 was externally added. The presence of sufficient concentrations of both NO2− and H2O2 optimized the formation of peroxynitrous acid (ONOOH), which caused a strong peroxidation of the cell membranes leading to the cell death, but it also made them more vulnerable to the PEF treatment. The results suggest that the interaction with radicals during the bacteria exposure to PAW leads to an antibacterial effect reinforced by the pulsed electric field, hence showing a synergy of the chemical and physical plasma agents. This opens new perspectives for applications both plasma and PEF areas of research.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T05:34:30Z
format Article
id doaj.art-061d212e6aeb41bbba8834bf1767ec04
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2296-424X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T05:34:30Z
publishDate 2022-07-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Physics
spelling doaj.art-061d212e6aeb41bbba8834bf1767ec042022-12-22T03:00:19ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Physics2296-424X2022-07-011010.3389/fphy.2022.895813895813Coupled Antibacterial Effects of Plasma-Activated Water and Pulsed Electric FieldRobin MentheourZdenko MachalaIn the biomedical applications of cold plasma, the dominant biological effect is most typically attributed to the reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (RONS), while the physical effect of electric fields is sometimes overlooked. Here, we investigated the antibacterial effect of RONS in plasma-activated water (PAW) on the inactivation of E. coli bacteria, coupled with a mild 200-nanosecond pulsed electric field (PEF) treatment. By using transient spark discharge plasma in open atmospheric air and closed air reactors, and by adding hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) into the PAW, different chemical compositions of RONS were obtained. We measured the time evolution of the concentrations of key species in the PAW post-discharge: nitrites (NO2−) and H2O2. PAW rich in both NO2− and H2O2 showed an antibacterial effect, which was enhanced by the PEF, whereas PAW rich in NO2− and poor in H2O2 showed an enhancement of the antibacterial effect by the PEF only when H2O2 was externally added. The presence of sufficient concentrations of both NO2− and H2O2 optimized the formation of peroxynitrous acid (ONOOH), which caused a strong peroxidation of the cell membranes leading to the cell death, but it also made them more vulnerable to the PEF treatment. The results suggest that the interaction with radicals during the bacteria exposure to PAW leads to an antibacterial effect reinforced by the pulsed electric field, hence showing a synergy of the chemical and physical plasma agents. This opens new perspectives for applications both plasma and PEF areas of research.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphy.2022.895813/fullcold atmospheric plasma (CAP)plasma activated water (PAW)pulsed electric field (PEF)E. coli (Escherichia coli)antibacterial effect
spellingShingle Robin Mentheour
Zdenko Machala
Coupled Antibacterial Effects of Plasma-Activated Water and Pulsed Electric Field
Frontiers in Physics
cold atmospheric plasma (CAP)
plasma activated water (PAW)
pulsed electric field (PEF)
E. coli (Escherichia coli)
antibacterial effect
title Coupled Antibacterial Effects of Plasma-Activated Water and Pulsed Electric Field
title_full Coupled Antibacterial Effects of Plasma-Activated Water and Pulsed Electric Field
title_fullStr Coupled Antibacterial Effects of Plasma-Activated Water and Pulsed Electric Field
title_full_unstemmed Coupled Antibacterial Effects of Plasma-Activated Water and Pulsed Electric Field
title_short Coupled Antibacterial Effects of Plasma-Activated Water and Pulsed Electric Field
title_sort coupled antibacterial effects of plasma activated water and pulsed electric field
topic cold atmospheric plasma (CAP)
plasma activated water (PAW)
pulsed electric field (PEF)
E. coli (Escherichia coli)
antibacterial effect
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphy.2022.895813/full
work_keys_str_mv AT robinmentheour coupledantibacterialeffectsofplasmaactivatedwaterandpulsedelectricfield
AT zdenkomachala coupledantibacterialeffectsofplasmaactivatedwaterandpulsedelectricfield