Comparison of Leaf Shape between a <i>Photinia</i> Hybrid and One of Its Parents

Leaf shape and size can vary between hybrids and their parents. However, this has seldom been quantitatively tested. <i>Photinia × fraseri</i> is an important landscaping plant in East Asia as a hybrid between evergreen shrubs <i>P. glabra</i> and <i>P. serratifolia<...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xiao Zheng, Karl J. Niklas, David A. Ratkowsky, Yabing Jiao, Hui Ding, Peijian Shi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-09-01
Series:Plants
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2223-7747/11/18/2370
_version_ 1797483443102154752
author Xiao Zheng
Karl J. Niklas
David A. Ratkowsky
Yabing Jiao
Hui Ding
Peijian Shi
author_facet Xiao Zheng
Karl J. Niklas
David A. Ratkowsky
Yabing Jiao
Hui Ding
Peijian Shi
author_sort Xiao Zheng
collection DOAJ
description Leaf shape and size can vary between hybrids and their parents. However, this has seldom been quantitatively tested. <i>Photinia × fraseri</i> is an important landscaping plant in East Asia as a hybrid between evergreen shrubs <i>P. glabra</i> and <i>P. serratifolia</i>. Its leaf shape looks like that of <i>P. serratifolia</i>. To investigate leaf shape, we used a general equation for calculating the leaf area (<i>A</i>) of broad-leaved plants, which assumes a proportional relationship between <i>A</i> and product of lamina length (<i>L</i>) and width (<i>W</i>). The proportionality coefficient (which is referred to as the Montgomery parameter) serves as a quantitative indicator of leaf shape, because it reflects the proportion of leaf area <i>A</i> to the area of a rectangle with <i>L</i> and <i>W</i> as its side lengths. The ratio of <i>L</i> to <i>W</i>, and the ellipticalness index were also used to quantify the complexity of leaf shape for elliptical leaves. A total of >4000 leaves from <i>P. × fraseri</i> and <i>P. serratifolia</i> (with >2000 leaves for each taxon) collected on a monthly basis was used to examine: (i) whether there is a significant difference in leaf shape between the two taxa, and (ii) whether there is a monotonic or parabolic trend in leaf shape across leaf ages. There was a significant difference in leaf shape between the two taxa (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Although there were significant differences in leaf shape on a monthly basis, the variation in leaf shape over time was not large, i.e., leaf shape was relatively stable over time for both taxa. However, the leaf shape of the hybrid was significantly different from its parent <i>P. serratifolia</i>, which has wider and more elliptical leaves than the hybrid. This work demonstrates that variations in leaf shape resulting from hybridization can be rigorously quantified and compared among species and their hybrids. In addition, this work shows that leaf shape does not changes as a function of age either before or after the full expansion of the lamina.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T22:47:03Z
format Article
id doaj.art-061edf6630fa4eeb82a7d5dd6b86027f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2223-7747
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T22:47:03Z
publishDate 2022-09-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Plants
spelling doaj.art-061edf6630fa4eeb82a7d5dd6b86027f2023-11-23T18:26:43ZengMDPI AGPlants2223-77472022-09-011118237010.3390/plants11182370Comparison of Leaf Shape between a <i>Photinia</i> Hybrid and One of Its ParentsXiao Zheng0Karl J. Niklas1David A. Ratkowsky2Yabing Jiao3Hui Ding4Peijian Shi5Research Center for Biodiversity Conservation and Biosafety, Nanjing Institute of Environmental Sciences, Ministry of Ecology and Environment of China, Nanjing 210042, ChinaSchool of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USATasmanian Institute of Agriculture, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 98, Hobart 7001, AustraliaBamboo Research Institute, College of Biology and the Environment, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, ChinaResearch Center for Biodiversity Conservation and Biosafety, Nanjing Institute of Environmental Sciences, Ministry of Ecology and Environment of China, Nanjing 210042, ChinaBamboo Research Institute, College of Biology and the Environment, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, ChinaLeaf shape and size can vary between hybrids and their parents. However, this has seldom been quantitatively tested. <i>Photinia × fraseri</i> is an important landscaping plant in East Asia as a hybrid between evergreen shrubs <i>P. glabra</i> and <i>P. serratifolia</i>. Its leaf shape looks like that of <i>P. serratifolia</i>. To investigate leaf shape, we used a general equation for calculating the leaf area (<i>A</i>) of broad-leaved plants, which assumes a proportional relationship between <i>A</i> and product of lamina length (<i>L</i>) and width (<i>W</i>). The proportionality coefficient (which is referred to as the Montgomery parameter) serves as a quantitative indicator of leaf shape, because it reflects the proportion of leaf area <i>A</i> to the area of a rectangle with <i>L</i> and <i>W</i> as its side lengths. The ratio of <i>L</i> to <i>W</i>, and the ellipticalness index were also used to quantify the complexity of leaf shape for elliptical leaves. A total of >4000 leaves from <i>P. × fraseri</i> and <i>P. serratifolia</i> (with >2000 leaves for each taxon) collected on a monthly basis was used to examine: (i) whether there is a significant difference in leaf shape between the two taxa, and (ii) whether there is a monotonic or parabolic trend in leaf shape across leaf ages. There was a significant difference in leaf shape between the two taxa (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Although there were significant differences in leaf shape on a monthly basis, the variation in leaf shape over time was not large, i.e., leaf shape was relatively stable over time for both taxa. However, the leaf shape of the hybrid was significantly different from its parent <i>P. serratifolia</i>, which has wider and more elliptical leaves than the hybrid. This work demonstrates that variations in leaf shape resulting from hybridization can be rigorously quantified and compared among species and their hybrids. In addition, this work shows that leaf shape does not changes as a function of age either before or after the full expansion of the lamina.https://www.mdpi.com/2223-7747/11/18/2370leaf ellipticalness indexleaf lengthleaf widthMontgomery equationMontgomery parameter
spellingShingle Xiao Zheng
Karl J. Niklas
David A. Ratkowsky
Yabing Jiao
Hui Ding
Peijian Shi
Comparison of Leaf Shape between a <i>Photinia</i> Hybrid and One of Its Parents
Plants
leaf ellipticalness index
leaf length
leaf width
Montgomery equation
Montgomery parameter
title Comparison of Leaf Shape between a <i>Photinia</i> Hybrid and One of Its Parents
title_full Comparison of Leaf Shape between a <i>Photinia</i> Hybrid and One of Its Parents
title_fullStr Comparison of Leaf Shape between a <i>Photinia</i> Hybrid and One of Its Parents
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Leaf Shape between a <i>Photinia</i> Hybrid and One of Its Parents
title_short Comparison of Leaf Shape between a <i>Photinia</i> Hybrid and One of Its Parents
title_sort comparison of leaf shape between a i photinia i hybrid and one of its parents
topic leaf ellipticalness index
leaf length
leaf width
Montgomery equation
Montgomery parameter
url https://www.mdpi.com/2223-7747/11/18/2370
work_keys_str_mv AT xiaozheng comparisonofleafshapebetweenaiphotiniaihybridandoneofitsparents
AT karljniklas comparisonofleafshapebetweenaiphotiniaihybridandoneofitsparents
AT davidaratkowsky comparisonofleafshapebetweenaiphotiniaihybridandoneofitsparents
AT yabingjiao comparisonofleafshapebetweenaiphotiniaihybridandoneofitsparents
AT huiding comparisonofleafshapebetweenaiphotiniaihybridandoneofitsparents
AT peijianshi comparisonofleafshapebetweenaiphotiniaihybridandoneofitsparents