Three-dimensional ultrasound versus office hysteroscopy in assessment of pain and bleeding with intrauterine contraceptive device

Objective: To compare three-dimensional ultrasound (3D US) examination of the uterus to office hysteroscopy as a method of diagnosing cause of pain and bleeding associated with intrauterine contraceptive device (IUCD). Design: Prospective comparative study. Patients and methods: Ninety patients with...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mona M. Aboulghar, Mohamed Hegazy, Waleed Saber, Alaa Hamed, Ahmed El Sheikhah
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2011-06-01
Series:Middle East Fertility Society Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S111056901000169X
_version_ 1818318910412292096
author Mona M. Aboulghar
Mohamed Hegazy
Waleed Saber
Alaa Hamed
Ahmed El Sheikhah
author_facet Mona M. Aboulghar
Mohamed Hegazy
Waleed Saber
Alaa Hamed
Ahmed El Sheikhah
author_sort Mona M. Aboulghar
collection DOAJ
description Objective: To compare three-dimensional ultrasound (3D US) examination of the uterus to office hysteroscopy as a method of diagnosing cause of pain and bleeding associated with intrauterine contraceptive device (IUCD). Design: Prospective comparative study. Patients and methods: Ninety patients with a copper IUCD inserted complaining of pain, bleeding or both, underwent 3D US examination of the uterus and adnexa. The coronal view of the three orthogonal planes of the 3D volume was used to assess site and position of the IUCD. Other abnormalities such as fibroids, adenomyosis and ovarian cysts were recorded as well. This was followed by office hysteroscopy, after control of any bleeding or infection. Results: By 3D US; 15 IUCDs (16.6%) were found displaced; 2 laterally displaced, 13 displaced downward, sensitivity, specificity, NPV, PPV and accuracy of 3D US in diagnosing displaced IUCD compared to hysteroscopy were 93.3%, 84%, 63.6%, 97.7%, and 86.2%. Additional findings detected by hysteroscopy; 2 embedded IUCDS, one missed polyp one missed intrauterine synechiae, one polypoid endometrium revealed endometrial hyperplasia. Seventeen patients (18%) had abnormalities of the ovaries and adnexa confirmed by ultrasound; 13 functional cysts, one endometrioma, one dermoid cyst, one case with polycystic ovaries and one hydrosalpinx. Conclusions: Patients with abnormal bleeding and pain with IUCD have frequent abnormally positioned IUCD and associated ovarian pathology. 3D US has high diagnostic accuracy and should be the first line of investigation. Office hysteroscopy should be performed only in suspected embedded IUCD or other endometrial abnormality.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T10:00:43Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0620fe72ba34406c8078763b6776fb1f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1110-5690
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T10:00:43Z
publishDate 2011-06-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series Middle East Fertility Society Journal
spelling doaj.art-0620fe72ba34406c8078763b6776fb1f2022-12-21T23:51:40ZengSpringerOpenMiddle East Fertility Society Journal1110-56902011-06-0116212112410.1016/j.mefs.2010.11.001Three-dimensional ultrasound versus office hysteroscopy in assessment of pain and bleeding with intrauterine contraceptive deviceMona M. AboulgharMohamed HegazyWaleed SaberAlaa HamedAhmed El SheikhahObjective: To compare three-dimensional ultrasound (3D US) examination of the uterus to office hysteroscopy as a method of diagnosing cause of pain and bleeding associated with intrauterine contraceptive device (IUCD). Design: Prospective comparative study. Patients and methods: Ninety patients with a copper IUCD inserted complaining of pain, bleeding or both, underwent 3D US examination of the uterus and adnexa. The coronal view of the three orthogonal planes of the 3D volume was used to assess site and position of the IUCD. Other abnormalities such as fibroids, adenomyosis and ovarian cysts were recorded as well. This was followed by office hysteroscopy, after control of any bleeding or infection. Results: By 3D US; 15 IUCDs (16.6%) were found displaced; 2 laterally displaced, 13 displaced downward, sensitivity, specificity, NPV, PPV and accuracy of 3D US in diagnosing displaced IUCD compared to hysteroscopy were 93.3%, 84%, 63.6%, 97.7%, and 86.2%. Additional findings detected by hysteroscopy; 2 embedded IUCDS, one missed polyp one missed intrauterine synechiae, one polypoid endometrium revealed endometrial hyperplasia. Seventeen patients (18%) had abnormalities of the ovaries and adnexa confirmed by ultrasound; 13 functional cysts, one endometrioma, one dermoid cyst, one case with polycystic ovaries and one hydrosalpinx. Conclusions: Patients with abnormal bleeding and pain with IUCD have frequent abnormally positioned IUCD and associated ovarian pathology. 3D US has high diagnostic accuracy and should be the first line of investigation. Office hysteroscopy should be performed only in suspected embedded IUCD or other endometrial abnormality.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S111056901000169XIUCDPainBleeding3D USOffice hysteroscopy
spellingShingle Mona M. Aboulghar
Mohamed Hegazy
Waleed Saber
Alaa Hamed
Ahmed El Sheikhah
Three-dimensional ultrasound versus office hysteroscopy in assessment of pain and bleeding with intrauterine contraceptive device
Middle East Fertility Society Journal
IUCD
Pain
Bleeding
3D US
Office hysteroscopy
title Three-dimensional ultrasound versus office hysteroscopy in assessment of pain and bleeding with intrauterine contraceptive device
title_full Three-dimensional ultrasound versus office hysteroscopy in assessment of pain and bleeding with intrauterine contraceptive device
title_fullStr Three-dimensional ultrasound versus office hysteroscopy in assessment of pain and bleeding with intrauterine contraceptive device
title_full_unstemmed Three-dimensional ultrasound versus office hysteroscopy in assessment of pain and bleeding with intrauterine contraceptive device
title_short Three-dimensional ultrasound versus office hysteroscopy in assessment of pain and bleeding with intrauterine contraceptive device
title_sort three dimensional ultrasound versus office hysteroscopy in assessment of pain and bleeding with intrauterine contraceptive device
topic IUCD
Pain
Bleeding
3D US
Office hysteroscopy
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S111056901000169X
work_keys_str_mv AT monamaboulghar threedimensionalultrasoundversusofficehysteroscopyinassessmentofpainandbleedingwithintrauterinecontraceptivedevice
AT mohamedhegazy threedimensionalultrasoundversusofficehysteroscopyinassessmentofpainandbleedingwithintrauterinecontraceptivedevice
AT waleedsaber threedimensionalultrasoundversusofficehysteroscopyinassessmentofpainandbleedingwithintrauterinecontraceptivedevice
AT alaahamed threedimensionalultrasoundversusofficehysteroscopyinassessmentofpainandbleedingwithintrauterinecontraceptivedevice
AT ahmedelsheikhah threedimensionalultrasoundversusofficehysteroscopyinassessmentofpainandbleedingwithintrauterinecontraceptivedevice