Biomechanical Testing of Two-Unit Bridges and a Comparison of Replacement Retention Depending on a Cementation Medium, Replacement Position, and Gap Size
Dental replacements are placed between the abutment teeth. The exceptions are two-unit bridges, as they are supported by a single tooth prepared only on one side of the missing tooth. The presented study deals with an analysis of a pressure force action on two-unit bridges placed in the frontal part...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2022-12-01
|
Series: | Journal of Functional Biomaterials |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2079-4983/13/4/286 |
_version_ | 1797456973124337664 |
---|---|
author | Alena Findrik Balogová Viktória Rajťúková Ľuboš Chromý Andrej Somoš Gabriela Ižaríková Radovan Hudák |
author_facet | Alena Findrik Balogová Viktória Rajťúková Ľuboš Chromý Andrej Somoš Gabriela Ižaríková Radovan Hudák |
author_sort | Alena Findrik Balogová |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Dental replacements are placed between the abutment teeth. The exceptions are two-unit bridges, as they are supported by a single tooth prepared only on one side of the missing tooth. The presented study deals with an analysis of a pressure force action on two-unit bridges placed in the frontal part (20 samples), where the pressure action is lower, and in the distal part (20 samples), where the pressure action is higher. A CAD program by 3Shape was used for digital designing with two different gap settings, 10 μm (20 samples) and 30 μm (20 samples). Two-unit bridges were attached to the prepared tooth using two types of dental cement (20/20 samples), which were selected for their physical and bioactive properties. All two-unit bridges (a total of 80 samples) were fabricated from CoCr alloys on Mlab cusing R by applying the Selective Laser Melting (SLM) technology. Mechanical testing was performed using the Inspekt5 table blue. The obtained data were used to verify the hypotheses—a difference between both types of cement (A ≠ B), a difference between the frontal and distal two-unit bridges (F ≠ D) and a difference between the gap sizes (10 ≠ 30). To confirm the given theories, data were statistically evaluated using the F-test and subsequent <i>t</i>-tests. The resulting <i>p</i>-value was compared with the level of significance (α = 0.05). A statistical evaluation revealed a significant difference between the compared groups; however, no explicit correlation between the individual groups of specimens was identified. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-09T16:15:28Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-0634d0a146274d09ac70db8992007dc1 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2079-4983 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-09T16:15:28Z |
publishDate | 2022-12-01 |
publisher | MDPI AG |
record_format | Article |
series | Journal of Functional Biomaterials |
spelling | doaj.art-0634d0a146274d09ac70db8992007dc12023-11-24T15:50:51ZengMDPI AGJournal of Functional Biomaterials2079-49832022-12-0113428610.3390/jfb13040286Biomechanical Testing of Two-Unit Bridges and a Comparison of Replacement Retention Depending on a Cementation Medium, Replacement Position, and Gap SizeAlena Findrik Balogová0Viktória Rajťúková1Ľuboš Chromý2Andrej Somoš3Gabriela Ižaríková4Radovan Hudák5Department of Biomedical Engineering and Measurement, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Košice, 040 01 Košice, SlovakiaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Measurement, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Košice, 040 01 Košice, SlovakiaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Measurement, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Košice, 040 01 Košice, SlovakiaClinic of Pneumology and Phthisiology, L. Pasteur University Hospital Košice, 040 11 Košice, SlovakiaDepartment of Applied Mathematics and Informatics, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Košice, 040 01 Košice, SlovakiaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Measurement, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Košice, 040 01 Košice, SlovakiaDental replacements are placed between the abutment teeth. The exceptions are two-unit bridges, as they are supported by a single tooth prepared only on one side of the missing tooth. The presented study deals with an analysis of a pressure force action on two-unit bridges placed in the frontal part (20 samples), where the pressure action is lower, and in the distal part (20 samples), where the pressure action is higher. A CAD program by 3Shape was used for digital designing with two different gap settings, 10 μm (20 samples) and 30 μm (20 samples). Two-unit bridges were attached to the prepared tooth using two types of dental cement (20/20 samples), which were selected for their physical and bioactive properties. All two-unit bridges (a total of 80 samples) were fabricated from CoCr alloys on Mlab cusing R by applying the Selective Laser Melting (SLM) technology. Mechanical testing was performed using the Inspekt5 table blue. The obtained data were used to verify the hypotheses—a difference between both types of cement (A ≠ B), a difference between the frontal and distal two-unit bridges (F ≠ D) and a difference between the gap sizes (10 ≠ 30). To confirm the given theories, data were statistically evaluated using the F-test and subsequent <i>t</i>-tests. The resulting <i>p</i>-value was compared with the level of significance (α = 0.05). A statistical evaluation revealed a significant difference between the compared groups; however, no explicit correlation between the individual groups of specimens was identified.https://www.mdpi.com/2079-4983/13/4/286biomechanical testingcobalt-chromedental cementdental replacementsgap size |
spellingShingle | Alena Findrik Balogová Viktória Rajťúková Ľuboš Chromý Andrej Somoš Gabriela Ižaríková Radovan Hudák Biomechanical Testing of Two-Unit Bridges and a Comparison of Replacement Retention Depending on a Cementation Medium, Replacement Position, and Gap Size Journal of Functional Biomaterials biomechanical testing cobalt-chrome dental cement dental replacements gap size |
title | Biomechanical Testing of Two-Unit Bridges and a Comparison of Replacement Retention Depending on a Cementation Medium, Replacement Position, and Gap Size |
title_full | Biomechanical Testing of Two-Unit Bridges and a Comparison of Replacement Retention Depending on a Cementation Medium, Replacement Position, and Gap Size |
title_fullStr | Biomechanical Testing of Two-Unit Bridges and a Comparison of Replacement Retention Depending on a Cementation Medium, Replacement Position, and Gap Size |
title_full_unstemmed | Biomechanical Testing of Two-Unit Bridges and a Comparison of Replacement Retention Depending on a Cementation Medium, Replacement Position, and Gap Size |
title_short | Biomechanical Testing of Two-Unit Bridges and a Comparison of Replacement Retention Depending on a Cementation Medium, Replacement Position, and Gap Size |
title_sort | biomechanical testing of two unit bridges and a comparison of replacement retention depending on a cementation medium replacement position and gap size |
topic | biomechanical testing cobalt-chrome dental cement dental replacements gap size |
url | https://www.mdpi.com/2079-4983/13/4/286 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alenafindrikbalogova biomechanicaltestingoftwounitbridgesandacomparisonofreplacementretentiondependingonacementationmediumreplacementpositionandgapsize AT viktoriarajtukova biomechanicaltestingoftwounitbridgesandacomparisonofreplacementretentiondependingonacementationmediumreplacementpositionandgapsize AT luboschromy biomechanicaltestingoftwounitbridgesandacomparisonofreplacementretentiondependingonacementationmediumreplacementpositionandgapsize AT andrejsomos biomechanicaltestingoftwounitbridgesandacomparisonofreplacementretentiondependingonacementationmediumreplacementpositionandgapsize AT gabrielaizarikova biomechanicaltestingoftwounitbridgesandacomparisonofreplacementretentiondependingonacementationmediumreplacementpositionandgapsize AT radovanhudak biomechanicaltestingoftwounitbridgesandacomparisonofreplacementretentiondependingonacementationmediumreplacementpositionandgapsize |