Biomechanical Testing of Two-Unit Bridges and a Comparison of Replacement Retention Depending on a Cementation Medium, Replacement Position, and Gap Size

Dental replacements are placed between the abutment teeth. The exceptions are two-unit bridges, as they are supported by a single tooth prepared only on one side of the missing tooth. The presented study deals with an analysis of a pressure force action on two-unit bridges placed in the frontal part...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alena Findrik Balogová, Viktória Rajťúková, Ľuboš Chromý, Andrej Somoš, Gabriela Ižaríková, Radovan Hudák
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-12-01
Series:Journal of Functional Biomaterials
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2079-4983/13/4/286
_version_ 1797456973124337664
author Alena Findrik Balogová
Viktória Rajťúková
Ľuboš Chromý
Andrej Somoš
Gabriela Ižaríková
Radovan Hudák
author_facet Alena Findrik Balogová
Viktória Rajťúková
Ľuboš Chromý
Andrej Somoš
Gabriela Ižaríková
Radovan Hudák
author_sort Alena Findrik Balogová
collection DOAJ
description Dental replacements are placed between the abutment teeth. The exceptions are two-unit bridges, as they are supported by a single tooth prepared only on one side of the missing tooth. The presented study deals with an analysis of a pressure force action on two-unit bridges placed in the frontal part (20 samples), where the pressure action is lower, and in the distal part (20 samples), where the pressure action is higher. A CAD program by 3Shape was used for digital designing with two different gap settings, 10 μm (20 samples) and 30 μm (20 samples). Two-unit bridges were attached to the prepared tooth using two types of dental cement (20/20 samples), which were selected for their physical and bioactive properties. All two-unit bridges (a total of 80 samples) were fabricated from CoCr alloys on Mlab cusing R by applying the Selective Laser Melting (SLM) technology. Mechanical testing was performed using the Inspekt5 table blue. The obtained data were used to verify the hypotheses—a difference between both types of cement (A ≠ B), a difference between the frontal and distal two-unit bridges (F ≠ D) and a difference between the gap sizes (10 ≠ 30). To confirm the given theories, data were statistically evaluated using the F-test and subsequent <i>t</i>-tests. The resulting <i>p</i>-value was compared with the level of significance (α = 0.05). A statistical evaluation revealed a significant difference between the compared groups; however, no explicit correlation between the individual groups of specimens was identified.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T16:15:28Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0634d0a146274d09ac70db8992007dc1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2079-4983
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T16:15:28Z
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Journal of Functional Biomaterials
spelling doaj.art-0634d0a146274d09ac70db8992007dc12023-11-24T15:50:51ZengMDPI AGJournal of Functional Biomaterials2079-49832022-12-0113428610.3390/jfb13040286Biomechanical Testing of Two-Unit Bridges and a Comparison of Replacement Retention Depending on a Cementation Medium, Replacement Position, and Gap SizeAlena Findrik Balogová0Viktória Rajťúková1Ľuboš Chromý2Andrej Somoš3Gabriela Ižaríková4Radovan Hudák5Department of Biomedical Engineering and Measurement, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Košice, 040 01 Košice, SlovakiaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Measurement, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Košice, 040 01 Košice, SlovakiaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Measurement, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Košice, 040 01 Košice, SlovakiaClinic of Pneumology and Phthisiology, L. Pasteur University Hospital Košice, 040 11 Košice, SlovakiaDepartment of Applied Mathematics and Informatics, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Košice, 040 01 Košice, SlovakiaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Measurement, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Košice, 040 01 Košice, SlovakiaDental replacements are placed between the abutment teeth. The exceptions are two-unit bridges, as they are supported by a single tooth prepared only on one side of the missing tooth. The presented study deals with an analysis of a pressure force action on two-unit bridges placed in the frontal part (20 samples), where the pressure action is lower, and in the distal part (20 samples), where the pressure action is higher. A CAD program by 3Shape was used for digital designing with two different gap settings, 10 μm (20 samples) and 30 μm (20 samples). Two-unit bridges were attached to the prepared tooth using two types of dental cement (20/20 samples), which were selected for their physical and bioactive properties. All two-unit bridges (a total of 80 samples) were fabricated from CoCr alloys on Mlab cusing R by applying the Selective Laser Melting (SLM) technology. Mechanical testing was performed using the Inspekt5 table blue. The obtained data were used to verify the hypotheses—a difference between both types of cement (A ≠ B), a difference between the frontal and distal two-unit bridges (F ≠ D) and a difference between the gap sizes (10 ≠ 30). To confirm the given theories, data were statistically evaluated using the F-test and subsequent <i>t</i>-tests. The resulting <i>p</i>-value was compared with the level of significance (α = 0.05). A statistical evaluation revealed a significant difference between the compared groups; however, no explicit correlation between the individual groups of specimens was identified.https://www.mdpi.com/2079-4983/13/4/286biomechanical testingcobalt-chromedental cementdental replacementsgap size
spellingShingle Alena Findrik Balogová
Viktória Rajťúková
Ľuboš Chromý
Andrej Somoš
Gabriela Ižaríková
Radovan Hudák
Biomechanical Testing of Two-Unit Bridges and a Comparison of Replacement Retention Depending on a Cementation Medium, Replacement Position, and Gap Size
Journal of Functional Biomaterials
biomechanical testing
cobalt-chrome
dental cement
dental replacements
gap size
title Biomechanical Testing of Two-Unit Bridges and a Comparison of Replacement Retention Depending on a Cementation Medium, Replacement Position, and Gap Size
title_full Biomechanical Testing of Two-Unit Bridges and a Comparison of Replacement Retention Depending on a Cementation Medium, Replacement Position, and Gap Size
title_fullStr Biomechanical Testing of Two-Unit Bridges and a Comparison of Replacement Retention Depending on a Cementation Medium, Replacement Position, and Gap Size
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanical Testing of Two-Unit Bridges and a Comparison of Replacement Retention Depending on a Cementation Medium, Replacement Position, and Gap Size
title_short Biomechanical Testing of Two-Unit Bridges and a Comparison of Replacement Retention Depending on a Cementation Medium, Replacement Position, and Gap Size
title_sort biomechanical testing of two unit bridges and a comparison of replacement retention depending on a cementation medium replacement position and gap size
topic biomechanical testing
cobalt-chrome
dental cement
dental replacements
gap size
url https://www.mdpi.com/2079-4983/13/4/286
work_keys_str_mv AT alenafindrikbalogova biomechanicaltestingoftwounitbridgesandacomparisonofreplacementretentiondependingonacementationmediumreplacementpositionandgapsize
AT viktoriarajtukova biomechanicaltestingoftwounitbridgesandacomparisonofreplacementretentiondependingonacementationmediumreplacementpositionandgapsize
AT luboschromy biomechanicaltestingoftwounitbridgesandacomparisonofreplacementretentiondependingonacementationmediumreplacementpositionandgapsize
AT andrejsomos biomechanicaltestingoftwounitbridgesandacomparisonofreplacementretentiondependingonacementationmediumreplacementpositionandgapsize
AT gabrielaizarikova biomechanicaltestingoftwounitbridgesandacomparisonofreplacementretentiondependingonacementationmediumreplacementpositionandgapsize
AT radovanhudak biomechanicaltestingoftwounitbridgesandacomparisonofreplacementretentiondependingonacementationmediumreplacementpositionandgapsize