Towards a typology of local migration diversity policies
Abstract This paper contributes to the migration studies literature by a comparative analysis of local migration diversity governance in large, mid-sized and small cities, analysing the broader scope of the local dimension of migration-diversity policies. While a ‘local turn’ has taken place in migr...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
SpringerOpen
2020-07-01
|
| Series: | Comparative Migration Studies |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40878-020-00179-0 |
| _version_ | 1818885678154383360 |
|---|---|
| author | Ilona van Breugel |
| author_facet | Ilona van Breugel |
| author_sort | Ilona van Breugel |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract This paper contributes to the migration studies literature by a comparative analysis of local migration diversity governance in large, mid-sized and small cities, analysing the broader scope of the local dimension of migration-diversity policies. While a ‘local turn’ has taken place in migration studies over the past two decades, the literature has primarily focused on capital and gateway cities. Yet immigrants arrive and settle in a much wider range of cities. Little is known about what forms migration-diversity governance across cities of different sizes and positions. This paper therefore conducts a comparative analysis of migration diversity governance across the local dimension. Based on a qualitative, comparative analysis of migration diversity policies in 16 Dutch municipalities between 2014 and 2018, I distinguish between different local migration diversity policy approaches: ‘proactive pluralist’, ‘proactive monist’, ‘reactive embedded’ and ‘reactive one-domain’. This illustrates the variety of local approaches to migration diversity and thus argues against ‘a local dimension’ of migration diversity governance, rather arguing for different types of local approaches. The proactive cities explicitly chose their own framing for their migration diversity policies, in contradiction to the supposed ‘paradigmatic’ character of the local level, instead showing that cities position their own framing of migration diversity. The types of migration diversity policies I distinguish provide an analytical framework and starting point for further research on the variety of local migration diversity approaches. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-19T16:09:15Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-063a25fca9334ff293748641a6b595ee |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2214-594X |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-19T16:09:15Z |
| publishDate | 2020-07-01 |
| publisher | SpringerOpen |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Comparative Migration Studies |
| spelling | doaj.art-063a25fca9334ff293748641a6b595ee2022-12-21T20:14:47ZengSpringerOpenComparative Migration Studies2214-594X2020-07-018111610.1186/s40878-020-00179-0Towards a typology of local migration diversity policiesIlona van Breugel0Department of Public Administration and Sociology, Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Social and Behavioural SciencesAbstract This paper contributes to the migration studies literature by a comparative analysis of local migration diversity governance in large, mid-sized and small cities, analysing the broader scope of the local dimension of migration-diversity policies. While a ‘local turn’ has taken place in migration studies over the past two decades, the literature has primarily focused on capital and gateway cities. Yet immigrants arrive and settle in a much wider range of cities. Little is known about what forms migration-diversity governance across cities of different sizes and positions. This paper therefore conducts a comparative analysis of migration diversity governance across the local dimension. Based on a qualitative, comparative analysis of migration diversity policies in 16 Dutch municipalities between 2014 and 2018, I distinguish between different local migration diversity policy approaches: ‘proactive pluralist’, ‘proactive monist’, ‘reactive embedded’ and ‘reactive one-domain’. This illustrates the variety of local approaches to migration diversity and thus argues against ‘a local dimension’ of migration diversity governance, rather arguing for different types of local approaches. The proactive cities explicitly chose their own framing for their migration diversity policies, in contradiction to the supposed ‘paradigmatic’ character of the local level, instead showing that cities position their own framing of migration diversity. The types of migration diversity policies I distinguish provide an analytical framework and starting point for further research on the variety of local migration diversity approaches.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40878-020-00179-0Local dimensionMigration diversity policiesComparative |
| spellingShingle | Ilona van Breugel Towards a typology of local migration diversity policies Comparative Migration Studies Local dimension Migration diversity policies Comparative |
| title | Towards a typology of local migration diversity policies |
| title_full | Towards a typology of local migration diversity policies |
| title_fullStr | Towards a typology of local migration diversity policies |
| title_full_unstemmed | Towards a typology of local migration diversity policies |
| title_short | Towards a typology of local migration diversity policies |
| title_sort | towards a typology of local migration diversity policies |
| topic | Local dimension Migration diversity policies Comparative |
| url | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40878-020-00179-0 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT ilonavanbreugel towardsatypologyoflocalmigrationdiversitypolicies |