Methodological Choices in Muscle Synergy Analysis Impact Differentiation of Physiological Characteristics Following Stroke

Muscle synergy analysis (MSA) is a mathematical technique that reduces the dimensionality of electromyographic (EMG) data. Used increasingly in biomechanics research, MSA requires methodological choices at each stage of the analysis. Differences in methodological steps affect the overall outcome, ma...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Caitlin L. Banks, Mihir M. Pai, Theresa E. McGuirk, Benjamin J. Fregly, Carolynn Patten
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-08-01
Series:Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fncom.2017.00078/full
_version_ 1818005588421902336
author Caitlin L. Banks
Caitlin L. Banks
Caitlin L. Banks
Mihir M. Pai
Theresa E. McGuirk
Benjamin J. Fregly
Benjamin J. Fregly
Carolynn Patten
Carolynn Patten
author_facet Caitlin L. Banks
Caitlin L. Banks
Caitlin L. Banks
Mihir M. Pai
Theresa E. McGuirk
Benjamin J. Fregly
Benjamin J. Fregly
Carolynn Patten
Carolynn Patten
author_sort Caitlin L. Banks
collection DOAJ
description Muscle synergy analysis (MSA) is a mathematical technique that reduces the dimensionality of electromyographic (EMG) data. Used increasingly in biomechanics research, MSA requires methodological choices at each stage of the analysis. Differences in methodological steps affect the overall outcome, making it difficult to compare results across studies. We applied MSA to EMG data collected from individuals post-stroke identified as either responders (RES) or non-responders (nRES) on the basis of a critical post-treatment increase in walking speed. Importantly, no clinical or functional indicators identified differences between the cohort of RES and nRES at baseline. For this exploratory study, we selected the five highest RES and five lowest nRES available from a larger sample. Our goal was to assess how the methodological choices made before, during, and after MSA affect the ability to differentiate two groups with intrinsic physiologic differences based on MSA results. We investigated 30 variations in MSA methodology to determine which choices allowed differentiation of RES from nRES at baseline. Trial-to-trial variability in time-independent synergy vectors (SVs) and time-varying neural commands (NCs) were measured as a function of: (1) number of synergies computed; (2) EMG normalization method before MSA; (3) whether SVs were held constant across trials or allowed to vary during MSA; and (4) synergy analysis output normalization method after MSA. MSA methodology had a strong effect on our ability to differentiate RES from nRES at baseline. Across all 10 individuals and MSA variations, two synergies were needed to reach an average of 90% variance accounted for (VAF). Based on effect sizes, differences in SV and NC variability between groups were greatest using two synergies with SVs that varied from trial-to-trial. Differences in SV variability were clearest using unit magnitude per trial EMG normalization, while NC variability was less sensitive to EMG normalization method. No outcomes were greatly impacted by output normalization method. MSA variability for some, but not all, methods successfully differentiated intrinsic physiological differences inaccessible to traditional clinical or biomechanical assessments. Our results were sensitive to methodological choices, highlighting the need for disclosure of all aspects of MSA methodology in future studies.
first_indexed 2024-04-14T04:46:07Z
format Article
id doaj.art-064f4ce1d99d4cff908c089e3bc6670e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1662-5188
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-14T04:46:07Z
publishDate 2017-08-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
spelling doaj.art-064f4ce1d99d4cff908c089e3bc6670e2022-12-22T02:11:27ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience1662-51882017-08-011110.3389/fncom.2017.00078257008Methodological Choices in Muscle Synergy Analysis Impact Differentiation of Physiological Characteristics Following StrokeCaitlin L. Banks0Caitlin L. Banks1Caitlin L. Banks2Mihir M. Pai3Theresa E. McGuirk4Benjamin J. Fregly5Benjamin J. Fregly6Carolynn Patten7Carolynn Patten8Neural Control of Movement Lab, Malcom Randall VA Medical CenterGainesville, FL, United StatesDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of FloridaGainesville, FL, United StatesRehabilitation Science Doctoral Program, Department of Physical Therapy, University of FloridaGainesville, FL, United StatesDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of FloridaGainesville, FL, United StatesNeural Control of Movement Lab, Malcom Randall VA Medical CenterGainesville, FL, United StatesDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of FloridaGainesville, FL, United StatesDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of FloridaGainesville, FL, United StatesNeural Control of Movement Lab, Malcom Randall VA Medical CenterGainesville, FL, United StatesRehabilitation Science Doctoral Program, Department of Physical Therapy, University of FloridaGainesville, FL, United StatesMuscle synergy analysis (MSA) is a mathematical technique that reduces the dimensionality of electromyographic (EMG) data. Used increasingly in biomechanics research, MSA requires methodological choices at each stage of the analysis. Differences in methodological steps affect the overall outcome, making it difficult to compare results across studies. We applied MSA to EMG data collected from individuals post-stroke identified as either responders (RES) or non-responders (nRES) on the basis of a critical post-treatment increase in walking speed. Importantly, no clinical or functional indicators identified differences between the cohort of RES and nRES at baseline. For this exploratory study, we selected the five highest RES and five lowest nRES available from a larger sample. Our goal was to assess how the methodological choices made before, during, and after MSA affect the ability to differentiate two groups with intrinsic physiologic differences based on MSA results. We investigated 30 variations in MSA methodology to determine which choices allowed differentiation of RES from nRES at baseline. Trial-to-trial variability in time-independent synergy vectors (SVs) and time-varying neural commands (NCs) were measured as a function of: (1) number of synergies computed; (2) EMG normalization method before MSA; (3) whether SVs were held constant across trials or allowed to vary during MSA; and (4) synergy analysis output normalization method after MSA. MSA methodology had a strong effect on our ability to differentiate RES from nRES at baseline. Across all 10 individuals and MSA variations, two synergies were needed to reach an average of 90% variance accounted for (VAF). Based on effect sizes, differences in SV and NC variability between groups were greatest using two synergies with SVs that varied from trial-to-trial. Differences in SV variability were clearest using unit magnitude per trial EMG normalization, while NC variability was less sensitive to EMG normalization method. No outcomes were greatly impacted by output normalization method. MSA variability for some, but not all, methods successfully differentiated intrinsic physiological differences inaccessible to traditional clinical or biomechanical assessments. Our results were sensitive to methodological choices, highlighting the need for disclosure of all aspects of MSA methodology in future studies.http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fncom.2017.00078/fullmuscle synergiesmotor modulesstrokelocomotionEMGvariability
spellingShingle Caitlin L. Banks
Caitlin L. Banks
Caitlin L. Banks
Mihir M. Pai
Theresa E. McGuirk
Benjamin J. Fregly
Benjamin J. Fregly
Carolynn Patten
Carolynn Patten
Methodological Choices in Muscle Synergy Analysis Impact Differentiation of Physiological Characteristics Following Stroke
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
muscle synergies
motor modules
stroke
locomotion
EMG
variability
title Methodological Choices in Muscle Synergy Analysis Impact Differentiation of Physiological Characteristics Following Stroke
title_full Methodological Choices in Muscle Synergy Analysis Impact Differentiation of Physiological Characteristics Following Stroke
title_fullStr Methodological Choices in Muscle Synergy Analysis Impact Differentiation of Physiological Characteristics Following Stroke
title_full_unstemmed Methodological Choices in Muscle Synergy Analysis Impact Differentiation of Physiological Characteristics Following Stroke
title_short Methodological Choices in Muscle Synergy Analysis Impact Differentiation of Physiological Characteristics Following Stroke
title_sort methodological choices in muscle synergy analysis impact differentiation of physiological characteristics following stroke
topic muscle synergies
motor modules
stroke
locomotion
EMG
variability
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fncom.2017.00078/full
work_keys_str_mv AT caitlinlbanks methodologicalchoicesinmusclesynergyanalysisimpactdifferentiationofphysiologicalcharacteristicsfollowingstroke
AT caitlinlbanks methodologicalchoicesinmusclesynergyanalysisimpactdifferentiationofphysiologicalcharacteristicsfollowingstroke
AT caitlinlbanks methodologicalchoicesinmusclesynergyanalysisimpactdifferentiationofphysiologicalcharacteristicsfollowingstroke
AT mihirmpai methodologicalchoicesinmusclesynergyanalysisimpactdifferentiationofphysiologicalcharacteristicsfollowingstroke
AT theresaemcguirk methodologicalchoicesinmusclesynergyanalysisimpactdifferentiationofphysiologicalcharacteristicsfollowingstroke
AT benjaminjfregly methodologicalchoicesinmusclesynergyanalysisimpactdifferentiationofphysiologicalcharacteristicsfollowingstroke
AT benjaminjfregly methodologicalchoicesinmusclesynergyanalysisimpactdifferentiationofphysiologicalcharacteristicsfollowingstroke
AT carolynnpatten methodologicalchoicesinmusclesynergyanalysisimpactdifferentiationofphysiologicalcharacteristicsfollowingstroke
AT carolynnpatten methodologicalchoicesinmusclesynergyanalysisimpactdifferentiationofphysiologicalcharacteristicsfollowingstroke