Cognitive Reflection Versus Calculation in Decision Making
Scores on the three-item Cognitive Reflection Test (CRT) have been linked with dual-system theory and normative decision making (Frederick, 2005). In particular, the CRT is thought to measure monitoring of System 1 intuitions such that, if cognitive reflection is high enough, intuitive errors will b...
Main Authors: | Aleksandr eSinayev, Ellen ePeters |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2015-05-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Psychology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00532/full |
Similar Items
-
Commentary: Cognitive Reflection Versus Calculation in Decision Making
by: Antonio eMastrogiorgio
Published: (2015-07-01) -
Differences in decisions affected by cognitive biases: examining human values, need for cognition, and numeracy
by: Regis K. Kakinohana, et al.
Published: (2023-09-01) -
Intuitive numbers guide decisions
by: Ellen Peters, et al.
Published: (2008-12-01) -
A reflection on cognitive reflection – testing convergent/divergent validity of two measures of cognitive reflection
by: Nikola Erceg, et al.
Published: (2020-09-01) -
Intuitive numbers guide decisions
by: Ellen Peters, et al.
Published: (2008-12-01)